Role of pronase hatching in enhancing the effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology programs


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Hatching from the zona pellucida is one of the most important stages of human preimplantation embryo development and spontaneous hatching inability is one of the causes of implantation failure in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. The use of mechanical integrity disorders or complete destruction of the zona pellucida (assisted hatching) can be an effective way to enhance the effectiveness of infertility treatment programs using ART techniques. Objective. To assess the results of ART programs depending on the performance and type of assisted hatching. Material and methods. The prospective cohort investigation enrolled 309 patients treated for infertility with in vitro fertilization (IVF). According to the type and performance of assisted blastocyst hatching, the patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) 106 patients undergoing laser hatching with partial removal of the zona pellucida; 2) 103 patients having pronase hatching with complete removal of the zona pellucida; 3) 100 patients with no assisted blastocyst hatching. The degree of maturity and the quality of oocytes and embryos were assessed; hatching was monitored using light microscopy. Results. The pregnancy rates were noted to be statistically higher in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3; the multiple pregnancy rates were significantly lower in Group 1. Conclusion. Complete zona pellucida removal is a new approach to assisted hatching, in which, firstly, there is no mechanical separation of the cells forming the embryo, and, secondly, there is a rapid contact with endometrial cells during implantation. This contributes to the reduction of the risk of monozygotic pregnancies during the transfer of one morphologically normal blastocyst, by enhancing the effectiveness of ART programs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nataliya Vitalievna Dolgushina

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: n_dolgushina@oparina4.ru
M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H., Head of R&D Department

Espet Omarbekovna Ibragimova

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: Espet2007@yandex.ru
PhD student of ART Department

Andrey Yurievich Romanov

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: romanovl553@yandex.ru
clinical resident

Nataliya Petrovna Makarova

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: np_makarova@oparina4.ru
PhD, Researcher of ART Department

Alina Anatolievna Dovgan

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: lina.dongan@gmail.com
postgraduate

Anastasia Grigorievna Syrkasheva

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_syrkasheva@oparina4.ru
M.D., Ph.D., Researcher of the IVF Department

Elena Anatolievna Kalinina

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

M.D., Ph.D., Head of Department of assistive technologies in infertility treatment

References

  1. Ковальская Е.В., Сыркашева А.Г., Романов А.Ю., Макарова Н.П., Долгушина Н.В. Современные представления о компактизации эмбрионов человека в условиях in vitro. Технологии живых систем. 2017; 14(1): 25-35.
  2. Шафеи Р.А., Сыркашева А.Г., Романов А.Ю., Макарова Н.П., Долгушина Н.В., Семенова М.Л. Хетчинг бластоцисты у человека. Онтогенез. 2017; 48(1): 8-20.
  3. Гоголевский П.А. Вспомогательный хэтчинг: показания, применение, результаты (обзор литературы). Проблемы репродукции. 1998; 1: 10-3.
  4. Ибрагимова Э.О.,Долгушина Н.В., Сыркашева А.Г.,Романов А.Ю., Языкова О.И., Макарова Н.П. Роль вспомогательного хетчинга в программах лечения бесплодия методами вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий: обзор литературы. Гинекология. 2016; 18(2): 44-7.
  5. Carney S.K., Das S., Blake D., Farquhar C., Seif M.W., Nelson L. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012; (12): CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub5.
  6. Cohen J., Elsner C., Kort H., Malter H., Massey J., Mayer M.P., Wiemer K. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum. Reprod. 1990; 5(1): 7-13.
  7. Tadir Y., Douglas-Hamilton D.H. Laser effects in the manipulation of human eggs and embryos for in vitro fertilization. Methods Cell Biol. 2007; 82: 409-31. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(06)82014-5.
  8. Schieve L.A., Meikle S.F., Peterson H.B., Jeng G., Burnett N.M., Wilcox L.S. Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? Fertil. Steril. 2000; 74(2): 288-94. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00602-6.
  9. Balaban B., Urman B., Alatas C., Mercan R., Mumcu A., Isiklar A. A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching. Hum. Reprod. 2002; 17(5): 1239-43.
  10. Сыркашева A.Г., Казакова В.В., Долгушина Н.В., Романов А.Ю., Андреева М.Г., Яроцкая Е.Л. Реализация программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий у пациенток с агрегатами гладкого эндоплазматического ретикулума в цитоплазме ооцитов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 7: 54-9. doi: 10.18565/aig.2016.7.54-59
  11. Приказ Минздрава России от 30.08.2012 N. 107н (ред. от 11.06.2015) “О порядке использования вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий, противопоказаниях и ограничениях к их применению.”
  12. Carney S., Das S., Blake D., Farquhar C., Seif M., Nelson L. Assisted hatching on assisted conception ( in vitro fertilisation ( IVF ) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection ( ICSI ). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; (12): CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub5.
  13. Feng H.L.,Hershlag A., Scholl G.M., Cohen M.A. A retroprospective study comparing three different assisted hatching techniques. Fertil. Steril. 2009; 91(4, Suppl.): 1323 5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.133
  14. Vitthala S., Gelbaya T., Brison D.R., Fitzgerald C.T., Nardo L.G. The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2009; 15(1): 45-55. doi: 10.1093/humupd/ dmn045.
  15. Luke B., Brown M., Wantman E., Stem J. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil. Seril. 2014; 101(3): 683-9.
  16. Bissonnette F, Cohen J., Collins J., Cowan L., Dale S., Dill S. et al. Incidence and complications of multiple gestation in Canada: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2007; 14(6): 773-90. doi: 10.1016/ S1472-6483(10)60681-5.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies