Molecular genetic prognostic factors for metastatic regional lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To identify molecular genetic prognostic factors for metastatic regional lymph node involvement in breast cancer (BC) on the basis of the gene-expression prof iling analysis of primary tumors. Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 200patients with morphologically verified unicentric invasive BC (TjNo.M,) who had been treated at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary in 2012 to 2015. A tumor tissue molecular genetic study was performed using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay; a diagnostic panel consisted of 28 functional genes. Results. In the metastatic regional lymph node involvement group, the primary breast tumor was characterized by enhanced proliferative activity in terms of the expression of the Ki-67 gene (p = 0.028) and by the higher mRNA levels of the NAT (p = 0.039) and CD68 (p <0.001) genes with a reduction in PTEN expression (p <0.001) and with decreased ESR1 gene expression (p = 0.043). A discriminant analysis showed that the accuracy in predicting the presence or absence of metastatic regional lymph node involvement on the basis of a primary tumor molecular genetic study using a 7-gene expression panel was 91.9 and 78.8%, respectively. Conclusion. The primary breast tumor tissue molecular genetic study involving a set of 7 genes (PTEN, CD68, CCNB1, MGB1, MYC, BCL2, and ESR1) can become an additional diagnostic tool for assessing the presence of metastatic lymph node involvement when planning the volume of axillary lymph node dissection in BC patients.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yu. A Dergunova

Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary

Email: dergunova.yu@mail.ru

V. K Bozhenko

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Research Center of Roentgenology and Radiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: vbojenko@mail.ru

V. V Podionov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dr.valery.rodionov@gmail.com

V. V Kometova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: vladakometova@gmail.com

M. V Makarova

Russian Research Center of Roentgenology and Radiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: maria.makarova.work@gmail.com

L. A Ashrafyan

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: info@opаrina4.ru

References

  1. Petrek J.A., Senie R.T., Peters M., Rosen P.P. Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis. Cancer. 2001; 92(6):1368-77. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010915)92:6<1368::aid-cncr1459>3.0.co;2-9
  2. Silberman A.W, McVay C, Cohen J.S., Altura J.F., Brackert S., Sarna G.P. et al. Comparative morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection and the sentinel lymph node technique: Implications for patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(1): 1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000129358.80798.62
  3. Qiu S.Q., Zeng H.C., Zhang F., Chen C4. Huang WH., Pleijhuis RG. A nomogram to predict the probability of axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients with positive axillary ultrasound. Sci Rep. 2016; 15(6): 21196. doi: 10.1038/srep21196.
  4. Fisher B, Jeong J.H., Anderson S., Bryant J., Fisher E.R., Wolmark N. Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by Irradiation. N. Engl. Med. 2002; 347(8): 567-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020128
  5. Orr R.K. The impact of prophylactic axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999; 6109: 116-27. doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0109-1
  6. Giuliano A.E., Hunt K.K., Ballman K.V., Beitsch P.D., Whitworth P.W., Blumencranz P.W., et al. Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection in Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis. JAMA. 2011; 305(6): 569-575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90.
  7. Shah-Khan M, Boughey J.C. Evolution of axillary nodal staging in breast cancer: clinical implications of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial. Cancer Control. 2012; 19: 267-276. doi: 10.1177/107327481201900403
  8. Каприн А.Д., Рожкова Н.И., ред. Маммология: Национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016. 496 c.
  9. Дергунова Ю.А., Родионов В.В., Боженко В.К., Кометова В.В., Дардык М.В. Клинико-морфологические и молекулярно-генетические предикторы метастатического поражения регионарных лимфатических узлов при раке молочной железы. Успехи молекулярной онкологии. 2018; 5(3): 8-16
  10. Харченко В.П., Хмелевский Е.В., Чхиквадзе В.Д., Боженко В.К., Паньшин Г.А., Колесников Р.В. Особенности развития и факторы риска постмастэктомических местно-регионарных рецидивов рака молочной железы. Вопросы онкологии. 2009; 55(4): 436-42
  11. Боженко В.К., Ашрафян Л.А., Антонова И.Б., Мельникова Н.В., Бурменская О.Н., Трофимов Д.Ю., Кудинова Е.А., Хунова Л.З., Слонов А.В., Близнюков О.П. Анализ экспрессии генов пролиферации и апоптоза при цервикальных интраэпителиальных неоплазиях и раке шейки матки. Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы. 2011; 4: 72-6
  12. Vandesompele J., De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van Roy N., De Paepe A. et all. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. Received 18.09.2020 Accepted 04.10.2020

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies