Office hysteroscopy and laser surgery in the treatment of cervical polyps


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background: Cervical polyps are usually an indication for surgical treatment. There is a vast variety of polyp removal techniques but all of them have such disadvantages as intravenous anesthesia, hospital admission, visualization difficulties and frequency of recurrence. Therefore, it is necessary to search for new effective and minimally invasive, but available cost-effective methods for both doctor and patient. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the two-step method of the cervical polyp removal using the office-based hysteroscopic operation followed by laser destruction of the peduncle bed of the removed polyp. Materials and methods: Office hysteroscopy and the cervical polyp removal followed by laser destruction of the peduncle bed of the polyp were performed in 72 women aged 21 to 44 years (mean age is 32.9±1.4 years). The first step was to remove a polyp during office hysteroscopy using Betocchi’s method; it was followed by the laser destruction of the peduncle bed of the removed polyp under colonoscopic guidance using a semiconductor diode 9W-laser with radiation wavelength 940nm. This method was used in the removal of polyps located in the middle third of the cervical canal and closer to the external orifice of the uterus. Results: Seventy-two women of reproductive age underwent a two-stage cervical polyp removal which included removal of the polyp with scissors inserted into the biopsy canal. All of the patients noted lack of pain syndrome during the manipulation. The size of the removed polyps varied from 0.5*0.5 to 1.0*2.5 cm. The combination of cervical polyps with endometrial ones, which were also removed during hysteroscopy, was noted in 15 (20.8%) patients. The total duration of this manipulation depended on the size and localization of the polyp and the length of its peduncle, but it did not exceed 10 minutes. In all the cases the diagnosis was confirmed by histological examination. According to the morphological signs, there were fibrous polyps (65%) or glandular fibrous polyps (35%). No cases of recurrent cervical polyps were reported within 12 months after the manipulation. Conclusion: The combined two-stage method for the removal of cervical polyps localized in the middle and lower third of the cervical canal is highly effective. This method does not require hospitalization or intravenous anesthesia; it minimizes cervical canal injuries and prevents recurrences; it also reduces invasiveness, labor intensity and economic costs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maria A. Shalina

D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction

Ph.D. (Medicine), Senior Researcher at the Department of Gynecology and Endocrinology

Armine R. Khachaturyan

D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction; Saint Petersburg State University

PhD. (Medicine), Senior Researcher at the Department of Gynecology and Endocrinology

Maria I. Yarmolinskaya

D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m.yarmolinskaya@gmail.com
MD, PhD, DSci (Medicine), Professor of the RAS, Head of the Department of Gynecology and Endocrinology, Head of the Diagnostics and Treatment of Endometriosis Center

References

  1. Максимова Т.А., Джибладзе Т.А., Зуев В.М., Ищенко А.И., Хохлова И.Д., Брюнин Д.В. Миниинвазивные вмешательства при полипах эндометрия и эндоцервикса у пациенток репродуктивного возраста. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога 2017; 17(1): 67-71. [Maksimova T.A., Dzhibladze T.A., Zuev V.M., Ishchenko A.I., Khokhlova I.D., Bryunin D.V. Minimally invasive interventions for endometrial and endocervix polyps in patients of reproductive age. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2017; 17(1): 67-71. https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush201717167-71.
  2. Budak A., Kanmaz A.G. Role of endometrial sampling in cases with asymptomatic cervical polyps. J. Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019; 48(3): 207-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.01.005.
  3. Tanos V., Berry K.E., Seikkula J., Abi Raad E., Stavroulis A., Sleiman Z., Campo R., Gordts S. The management of polyps in female reproductive organs. Int J. Surg. 2017; 43: 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.012.
  4. Ушакова С.В., Зароченцева Н.В., Меньшикова Н.С., Кещьян Л.В. Особенности заболеваний шейки матки у беременных с привычным невынашиванием в анамнезе. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2017; 17(2): 13-9. https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush201717213-19.
  5. Younis M.T., Iram S., Anwar B., Ewies A.A.A. Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases. Eur J. Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 150(2): 190-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.020.
  6. Wright V.C. Principles of Cervical Colposcopy - a Textand Atlas. Houston: Biomedical-Communications; 2004.
  7. Железное Б.И., Стрижаков А.Н., Лебедев В.А. Клиника, диагностика и лечение полипов эндометрия. Акушерство и гинекология. 1988; 11: 73-7.
  8. Stamatellos I., Stamatopoulos P., Bontis J. The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007; 276(4): 299-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0417-2.
  9. Давыдов А.И., Бахтияров К.Р., Белоцеркоецееа Л.Д. Гистерорезектоскопия: возможности и перспективы. Акушерство и гинекология. 1997; 2: 7-10.
  10. Bettocchi S., Ceci O., Nappi L., Di Venere R., Masciopinto V., Pansini V., Pinto L., Santoro A., Cormio G. Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004; 11(1): 59-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60012-6.
  11. Bettocchi S., Achilarre M.T., Ceci O., Luigi S. Fertility-enhancing hysteroscopic surgery. Semin Reprod Med. 2011; 29(2): 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1272469.
  12. Дубинин А.А., Панидов К.В., Тугушев М.Т. Сравнительная эффективность оперативной гистероскопии по методике Bettocchi и гистеро-резектоскопии при рассечении синехий полости матки. Материалы XI Всероссийского научного форума «Мать и Дитя». Москва, 28 сентября-1 октября 2010 г. М.; 2010: 362-3.
  13. Хачатурян А.Р. Кольпоскопия. Основные алгоритмы диагностики и тактики ведения заболеваний шейки матки: учебное пособие. Под ред. Э.К. Айламазяна. Второе издание, исправленное и доработанное. СПб: Эко-Вектор; 2017. 93 с.
  14. Шалина М.А., Хачатурян А.Р., Ярмолинская М.И., Коган И.Ю. Патент на изобретение РФ № 2737504 «Способ удаления полипов цервикального канала» (дата государственной регистрации в Государственном реестре изобретений РФ 01.12.2020)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies