RESULTS OF THE WORK OF YAROSLAVL OBSTETRIC SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
- Autores: OKHAPKIN M.B1, KHITROV M.V1, GURIEV D.L1
-
Afiliações:
- Yaroslavl State Medical Academy, Russian Agency for Health Care
- Edição: Nº 1 (2012)
- Páginas: 94-97
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246739
- ID: 246739
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
The paper presents the results of the work of Yaroslavl obstetric service over 10 years (1998 to 2007). It proposes to optimize indications for cesarean section in order to reduce its frequency and to extend the use of fetal vacuum extraction and discusses the principles of management in pregnant women with arterial hypertension. It is concluded that to follow the current scientific principles requires no additional material costs and financing, but substantially enhances the efficiency of the work of obstetric service.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Sobre autores
M. OKHAPKIN
Yaroslavl State Medical Academy, Russian Agency for Health Care
Email: okhapkin52@mail.ru
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Course of the Faculty of Postgraduate Education
M. KHITROV
Yaroslavl State Medical Academy, Russian Agency for Health CareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Course of the Faculty of Postgraduate Education
D. GURIEV
Yaroslavl State Medical Academy, Russian Agency for Health CareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Course of the Faculty of Postgraduate Education
Bibliografia
- Гринхальх Т. Основы доказательной медицины: Пер. с англ. — М.: ГЭОТАР-Мед, 2004. — С. 240.
- Энкин М., Кейрс М., Нейлсон Д. и др. Руководство по эффективной помощи при беременности и рождении ребенка: Пер. англ. — С-Петербург: Петрополис, 2003. — С. 480.
- Goffinet F., Carayol M., Foidart J.M. et al. for the PREMODA Study Group. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium / /Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2006. — Vol. 194, № 4. — P. 1002—1011.
- Guise J.M., McDonagh M., Hashima J. et al. Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section // Best Practice & Research Clinical Obst. & Gyn. — 2005. — Vol. 19, № 1. — P. 117—130.
- Hannah M., Hannah W., Hewson S., Hodnett E., Saigal S., Willan A. for the Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomized multicenter trial // Lancet. — 2000. — Vol. 356, № 923. — P. 1375—1383.
- Hartmann K., Viswanathan M., Palmieri R. et al. Outcomes of routine episiotomy // JAMA. - 2005. — Vol. 293, № 17. — P. 2141—2148.
- Kotaska A. Combating coercion: breech birth, parturient choice and the evolution of evidence-based maternity care // Birth. — 2007. — Vol. 34, № 2. — P. 176—180.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. Guideline. — 2005. — № 26. — Р. 13.
Arquivos suplementares
