Reducing the fluid loss in case of depressurization of tractors’ hydraulic drive

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The operation of hydraulic drives of agricultural machinery is associated with the problem of leakage of fuel and lubricants, leading to contamination of water and soil. The most intense oil spill occurs when high-pressure hoses of hydraulic equipment are destroyed. The existing methods of solving the problem of oil leakage from high-pressure hoses have severe restrictions and high costs of their implementation. One of the effective methods of solving the problem is the use of hydraulic drive protection devices that disconnect the unpressurised section from the pressure source.

AIMS: To develop an improved protection device – an emergency stop device that controls a hydraulic drive with several types of hydraulic motors with a minimum number of device elements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design of a hydraulic drive emergency stop device (RUF Patent No. 2522013) installed in the hydraulic system of a tractor with single- and double-acting hydraulic cylinders has been developed. The method in use is a morphological analysis of the structure and distinctive features of existing engineering solutions.

RESULTS: The shutdown unit and the terminal sensor of the emergency stop device compare the value of the hydraulic pump supply with the flow rate in the drain line. At the same time, the device is able to automatically adjust itself to their permissible difference, ensuring that there are no false responses when using double-cavity hydraulic cylinders with one rod. False responses when connecting a single-cavity hydraulic cylinder are prevented by using an additional flow sensor that blocks the shutdown unit. The fluid flow is throttled in the annular gaps between the pistons, sensor and shutdown unit housings; in this case, both pistons are mutually balanced.

CONCLUSIONS: The proposed solution is aimed to eliminate significant oil throw-out form high-pressure hoses and makes it possible to use a single device for controlling the whole tractor hydraulic system. As a result, the weight and cost of the protection device reduce and the hydraulic drive scheme does not complicate significantly. The developed device does not demand additional power supply from the tractor’s on-board power circuit, as it operates with use of hydraulic energy. The protection device is applicable to hydraulic cylinders and hydraulic motors of various sizes thanks to ability of self-adjustment to the greatest difference in flow rate.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey L. Vdovin

Volga State University Of Technology

Author for correspondence.
Email: vdovinsl84@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5314-3767
SPIN-code: 7451-3751

Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate Professor of the Transport and Technological Machines Department
Russian Federation, Yoshkar-Ola

Maxim D. Bogatyrev

Volga State University of Technology

Email: BogatyrevMD@volgatech.net
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4402-6088
SPIN-code: 5164-4320

Associate Professor of the Transport and Technological Machines Department

Russian Federation, Yoshkar-Ola

Konstantin N. Nikonorov

Volga State University of Technology

Email: NikonorovKN@volgatech.net
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6541-0874
SPIN-code: 2022-3428

Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate Professor of the Transport and Technological Machines Department

Russian Federation, Yoshkar-Ola

Peter A. Korotkov

Volga State University of Technology

Email: KorotkovPA@volgatech.net
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0340-074X
SPIN-code: 4761-1375

Associate Professor of the Transport and Technological Machines Department

Russian Federation, Yoshkar-Ola

References

  1. Dats FA, Nazarenko AS. Study of the nature of operational failures of high-pressure hoses on the efficiency of John Deere machines in the conditions of the Vologda region. Vestnik MGUL – Lesnoy vestnik. 2010;5:90–95. (in Russ).
  2. Fomenko VN. Razrabotka sistem zashchity gidroprivodov mekhanizmov naveski tyagovykh i spetsialnykh transportnykh mashin [dissertation] Volgograd; 2000. (in Russ).
  3. Vdovin SL. Improvement of shut-off devices for the hydraulic drive of transport vehicles and special equipment to increase their efficiency and environmental friendliness. Integral. Nauchno-prakticheskiy mezhotraslevoy zhurnal. 2012;1(63):61. (in Russ).
  4. Ksenevich IP, Nasirov VA. Ways to reduce oil losses during tractor operation. Tekhnika v selskom khozyaystve. 1989;6:22–23. (in Russ).
  5. Patent RUS 2319054 / 10.03.08. Byul. № 7. Averyanov VK, Smirnov SN, Barash AL, et al. Klapannaya sistema avariynogo otklyucheniya. (in Russ). Accessed: 13.12.2022. Available from: https://new.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=RUPAT&DocNumber=2319054&TypeFile=html
  6. Patent RUS 2007102410 / 27.07.08. Byul. № 21. Lobazov PP. Zashchita gidravlicheskoy sistemy ot utechek zhidkosti. (in Russ). Accessed: 13.12.2022. Available from: https://new.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=RUPAT&DocNumber=2007102410&TypeFile=html
  7. Patent RUS 2522013 / 10.07.14. Byul. № 19. Vdovin SL. Avtomat razgermetizatsii gidrosistemy. (in Russ). Accessed: 13.12.2022. Available from: https://new.fips.ru/registers-doc-view/fips_servlet?DB=RUPAT&DocNumber=2522013&TypeFile=html

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The structural scheme of emergency stop device and its location in the hydraulic system: 1 – a shutdown unit; 2 – a terminal sensor; 3 – an additional flow rate sensor; 4 – a blocking unit; 5 – a housing of the blicking unit; 6, 10, 15 – pistons; 7, 8, 11, 12, 16 – rods; 9 – a housing of the terminal sensor; 13 – a plunger; 14 – a bushing; 17 – a feedback hydraulic line; 18, 19 – springs; b, c – channels; d – the gap.

Download (139KB)
3. Fig. 2. Operation of the emergency stop unit in the normally operating hydraulic system: position numbers are identical to fig. 1.

Download (197KB)
4. Рис. 3. Срабатывание автомата разгерметизации: номера позиций – согласно рис. 1.

Download (174KB)
5. Fig. 4. Displacement of emergency stop device elements at operation of the hydraulic drive: a) displacement of the shutdown unit piston хп1.1 at operation of double-cavity hydraulic cylinder; b) displacement of the shutdown unit piston хп1 and the blocking unit plunger хп2 at operation of single-cavity hydraulic cylinder.

Download (155KB)
6. Рис. 5. Зависимости показателей эффективности устройства аварийного отключения гидропривода от интенсивности Qразр. истечения жидкости через негерметичность, дм3/мин: а) – объема потерь рабочей жидкости, дм3; b) – времени срабатывания устройства, с; c) – объема сохраненной рабочей жидкости, дм3.

Download (155KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector



 СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 81900 выдано 05.10.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies