Pogor’uy formation of the proterozoic, Yenisey Ridge: age and provenance according to U–Pb-isotopic detrital zircon dating

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The results of U–Pb-isotopic dating of detrital zircons from sandstones of the Proterozoic Pogor`uy Fm. from the northern and southern parts of the Eastern-Angara block of the Yenisei Ridge are presented. The sandstones of the northern part of the Eastern-Angara block are dominated by the Archean and Paleoproterozoic populations of detrital zircons, while in the samples from the southern part of the Eastern-Angara block up to 25% of the Mesoproterozoic age grains have been fixed. The dates of detrital zircons allow us to constrain the maximum sedimentary age of the Pogor`uy Fm. and the entire interval of its formation as 1.2–0.9 Ga. The paleogeographic features of the formation of the Pogor`uy Fm. in the context of existing views on a location of Siberia within the Rodinia supercontinent are considered.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. S. Priyatkina

Institute of Earth Sciences of St. Petersburg State University; University of Newcastle

Author for correspondence.
Email: nadezda.priyatkina@gmail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg; Australia

N. B. Kuznetsov

Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University)

Email: nadezda.priyatkina@gmail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

S. V. Rud`ko

Geological Institute RAS

Email: nadezda.priyatkina@gmail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. V. Shatsillo

Institute of the Earth Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nadezda.priyatkina@gmail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. K. Khudoley

Institute of Earth Sciences of St. Petersburg State University

Email: nadezda.priyatkina@gmail.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

T. V. Romanyuk

Institute of the Earth Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nadezda.priyatkina@gmail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. V. Maslov

Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nadezda.priyatkina@gmail.ru
Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg

References

  1. Верниковский В.А., Метелкин Д.В., Верниковская А.Е., Матушкин Н.Ю., Казанский А.Ю., Кадильников П.И., Ро-манова И.В., Вингейт М. Т.Д., Ларионов А.Н., Родионов Н.В. // Геология и геофизика. 2016. Т. 57. № 1. С. 63–90.
  2. Лиханов И.И., Ножкин А.Д., Ревердатто В.В., Козлов П.С. // Геотектоника. 2014. № 5. С. 32–53.
  3. Vernikovsky V.A., Vernikovskaya A.E., Win­gate M.T.D., Popov N.V., Kovach V.P. // Precambr. Res. 2007. V. 154. P. 175–191.
  4. Cтратиграфия нефтегазоносных бассейнов Сибири. Рифей и венд Сибирской платформы и её складчатого обрамления / Под ред. Н.В. Мельникова Новосибирск: Гео, 2005. Кн. 1. 428 c.
  5. Волобуев М.И., Зыков С.И., Cтупникова С.И. Проблемы современной геохронологии. М.: Нау- ка, 1976. C. 96–123.
  6. Кириченко В.Т., Зуев В.К., Перфилова О.Ю., Сосновская О.В., Смокотина И.В., Маркович Л.А., Бородин В.П., Миронюк Е.П. Государственная геологическая карта Российской Федерации. 1 : 1 000 000 (­третье поколе-ние). Сер. Ангаро-Енисейская. Лист О 47–Братск. Объясн. зап. СПб.: Картфаб рика ВСЕГЕИ, 2012. 470 с.
  7. Вишневская И.А., Кочнев Б.Б., Летникова Е.Ф., Кузнецов А.Б., Прошенкин А.И. // ДАН. 2012. Т. 443. № 4. С. 459–463.
  8. Хабаров Е. M., Пономарчук В.А., Морозова И.П., Травин А.П. // Cтратиграфия. Геол. корреляция. 1999. Т. 7. № 6. С. 20–40.
  9. Ножкин А. Д., Туркина О.М., Бибикова Е.В., Терлеев А.А., Хоментовский В.В. // Геология и геофизика. 1999. Т. 40. № 9. С. 1305–1313.
  10. Priyatkina N., Khudoley A.K., Collins W.J., Kuz­netsov N.B., Huang, H.-Q. // Pecambr. Res. 2016. V. 285. P. 21–38.
  11. Khudoley A., Chamberlain K., Ershova V., Sears J., Prokopiev A., MacLean J., Kazakova G., Malyshev S., Molchanov A., Kullerud K., Toro J., Miller E., Vese­- lovskiy R., Li A., Chipley D. // Precambr. Res. 2015. V. 259. P. 78–94.
  12. Rainbird R.H., Stern R.A., Khudoley A.K., Kropa­chev A.P., Heaman L.M., Sukhorukov V.I. // Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 1998. V. 164. P. 409–420.
  13. Kuznetsov V. G. // J. Petrol. Geol. 1997. V. 20. P. 459–474.
  14. Ernst R.E., Hamilton M.A., Soderlund U., Hanes J.A., Gladkochub D.P., Okrugin A.V., Kolo­ti­lina T., Mekhonoshin A.S., Bleeker W., LeChemi­nant A.N., Buchan K. L., Chamberlain K.R., Diden­ko A.N. // Nature Geosci. 2016. V. 9. P. 464–469.
  15. Филипцов Ю.А. Нефтегазоносность верхнего протерозоя западной части Сибирской платформы. Дис. д ра геол.-мин. наук. Новосибирск: ИНГГ СО РАН, 2015. 449 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. A schematic stratigraphic section of Upper Precambrian formations of the Irkineevsky uplift. 1 — limestone, 2 — dolomite, 3 — dolomite and calcareous marls, 4 — conglomerates, 5 — sandstones, 6 — siltstone, mudstones; 7–9 - structural and textural peculiarities of the rocks (7 - stromatolite constructions of the bioherm), 8 - lumpy storm lamination, 9 - gradation lamination in turbidites. Abbreviations of suites on the stratigraphic column: ud - udereyskaya, pg - Pogoruyskaya, kt - skly Cards, alyo - Aladinskaya, fr - potoskuyskaya, shn - shuntarskaya, ash - aleshinsky, chs - chistyakovskaya, msh - moshakovskaya, os - island.

Download (461KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Age distribution of detrital zircons from sandstones attributed to the Kerpyl Riphean horizon: the Pogoruysk Formation of the East Angara block of the Zaangarsk part of the Yenisei Ridge (a – c, present study) and sandstones of the ridge. Sette-Daban (southeastern folded periphery of the Siberian platform (g, from [11]): N is the total number of grains analyzed, n is the number of grains with a discoding of <10%.

Download (2MB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2019 Russian Academy of Sciences