Strategy of Russia’s spatial development in a turbulent world: goals, priorities, key approaches

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Currently, a very complex and multidimensional transformation of the socio-economic system of Russia is taking place. According to the authors, its essence is to find an acceptable combination of the unique conditions and features that our country possesses. Vast territories significantly affect all major economic and social processes: from the interaction of economic agents and infrastructure development directions to the formation of specific types of economic activities. The hasty and uncritical borrowing of experience in solving issues from other countries has exacerbated many problems of Russia’s spatial development. That is why, in today’s conditions of high geopolitical tension and increasing complexity of supply chains, it is important to combine spatial, technological and industrial policies. Strategic documents in the field of spatial development should reflect approaches and mechanisms that ensure the synergetic interaction of the socio-economic systems of the regions.

About the authors

V. A. Kryukov

Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: kryukov@ieie.nsc.ru

Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director

Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

E. A. Kolomak

Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the RAS

Email: ekolomak@academ.org

Doctor of Economics, Deputy Director
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

References

  1. Крюков В.А., Токарев А.Н. Нефтегазовый сервис: от мирового контекста к локальным знаниям и эффектам // ЭКО. 2024. № 2. С. 8–28.
  2. Kryukov V.A., Tokarev A.N. Oil and gas service: from the world context to local knowledge and effects // ECO. 2024, no. 2, pp. 8–28. (In Russ.)
  3. Крюков В.А. Сырьевые территории в новой институциональной реальности // Пространственная экономика. 2014. № 4. С. 26–60.
  4. Kryukov V.A. Resource territories in the new institutional reality // Spatial Economics. 2014, no. 4, pp. 26–60. (In Russ.)
  5. Крюков В.А. Политика индустриализации – в поисках фарватера между Сциллой комбинирования и Харибдой согласования / Индустриальное развитие России: этапы, особенности, перспективы изучения: сб. науч. трудов. Новосибирск: ИПЦ НГУ, 2024. С. 26–43.
  6. Kryukov V.A. Industrialization policy – in search of a fairway between Scylla of combination and Charybdis of coordination / Industrial development of Russia: stages, features, prospects of study: a collection of scientific papers. Novosibirsk: IPC NSU, 2024. Pp. 26–43. (In Russ.)
  7. Millot V., Rawdanowicz Ł. The return of industrial policies: Policy considerations in the current context // Economic OECD Policy Paper. 2024, no. 34, pp. 8–42.
  8. Zhang J., Teng T., Wang T., Zeng G. The Path Innovation of Regional Economic Growth: Data Analysis Based on China // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s13132-024-01847-7
  9. Bathelt H., Malmberg A., Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation // Progress in Human Geography. 2004, vol. 28 (1), pp. 31–56.
  10. Baumgartinger-Seiringer S., Fuenfschilling L., Miörner J., Trippl M. Reconsidering regional structural conditions for industrial renewal // Regional Studies. 2022, vol. 56 (4), pp. 579–591.
  11. Bing S.H., Danni S., Zhaodui S.H. Global value chain, national value chain and economic growth: Substitution or complementarity // The Journal of World Economy. 2020, vol. 43 (4), pp. 3–27.
  12. Basilico S. Holger Graf Bridging technologies in the regional knowledge space: measurement and evolution // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2023, vol. 33, pp. 1085–1124.
  13. Hausmann R., Klinger B. The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage // Technical Report 146. Center for International Development at Harvard University, 2007.
  14. Graf H. Networks in the Innovation Process: Local and Regional Interactions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006.
  15. Pavitt K. Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems // Scientometrics. 1985, vol. 7, pp. 77–99.
  16. Jaffe A.B. Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers // Res. Policy. 1989, vol. 18 (2), pp. 87–97.
  17. Bresnahan T.F. General Purpose Technologies // Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. 2010, vol. 2, pp. 761– 791.
  18. Posada J. et al. Visual Computing as a Key Enabling Technology for Industrie 4.0 and Industrial Internet // IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2015, vol. 35 (2), pp. 26–40.
  19. Kogler D.F., Rigby D.L., Tucker I. Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities // Eur. Plan. Stud. 2013, vol. 21 (9), pp. 1374–1391.
  20. Hidalgo C.A., Klinger B., Barabasi A.L., Hausmann R. The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations // Science. 2007, vol. 317 (5837), pp. 482–487.
  21. Frenken K., Neffke F., van Dam Capabilities A. Institutions and regional economic development: a proposed synthesis // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2023, vol. 16, pp. 405–416.
  22. Крюков В.А., Селиверстов В.Е. Пространство и экономика Сибири: от изучения особенностей развития к проектированию направлений роста социальной ценности // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2022. № 5. С. 33–42.
  23. Kryukov V.A., Seliverstov V.E. Space and economy of Siberia: from the study of development features to the design of directions of social value growth // Problems of forecasting. 2022, no. 5, pp. 33–42. (In Russ.)
  24. Balland P.-A., Boschma R., Crespo J. Rigby D.L. Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification // Regional Studies. 2019, vol. 53, pp. 1252–1268.
  25. Davies B., Marе D.C. Relatedness, complexity and local growth // Regional Studies. 2021, vol. 55, pp. 479–494.
  26. Mewes L., Brеkel T. Technological complexity and economic growth of regions // Research Policy. 2022, vol. 51, 104156.
  27. Rigby D.L., Roesler C., Kogler D. et al. Do EU regions benefit from Smart Specialisation principles? // Regional Studies. 2022, vol. 56, pp. 2058–2073.
  28. Heim I., Kalyuzhnova Ye., Ghobadian A. Win-win strategies for firms operating in resource-abundant countries: Technological spillovers and a collaborative diversification policy // Resources Policy. 2023, vol. 83, 103578.
  29. Bastida A.E. From extractive to transformative industries: paths for linkages and diversification for resource-driven development // Mineral Economics. 2014, vol. 27 (2–3), pp. 73–87.
  30. Doring T., Schnellenbach J. What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature // Regional Studies. 2006, vol. 40 (3), pp. 375–395.
  31. Katz J., Pietrobelli C. Natural resource-based growth, global value chains and domestic capabilities in the mining industry // Resources. Policy. 2018, vol. 58, pp. 1–20.
  32. Zhang L. Understanding the new quality productive forces in the energy sector // Energy Nexus. 2024, vol. 16, 100352.
  33. He C., Ren Zh., Zhu Sh., Hu X. Temporary extra-regional linkages and export product and market diversification // Regional Studies. 2022, vol. 57 (1), pp. 1–14.
  34. Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment // Regional Studies. 2005, vol. 39 (1), pp. 61–74.
  35. MacKinnon D., Dawley S., Pike A., Cumbers A. Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach // Economic Geography. 2019, vol. 95 (2), pp. 113–135.
  36. Binz C., Truffer B., Coenen L. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing // Economic Geography. 2016, vol. 92 (2), pp. 172–200.
  37. Trippl M., Grillitsch M., Isaksen A. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development // Progress in Human Geography. 2018, vol. 42 (5), pp. 687–705.
  38. Yeung H.W. Drivers of Globalization: An Evolutionary Perspective on Firm-State Relations in the Asian Newly Industrialized Economies // Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography. 2009, 09.20.
  39. Grillitsch M. et al. Patterns of opportunity spaces and agency across regional contexts: Conditions and drivers for change // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2024, pp. 1–25. doi: 10.1177/0308518X241303636
  40. Grillitsch M., Sotarauta M. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces // Progress in Human Geography. 2020, vol. 44 (4), pp. 704–723.
  41. Asheim B.T., Herstad S.J. Regional innovation strategy for resilience and transformative industrial path development: evolutionary theoretical perspectives on innovation policy // Eastern Journal of European Studies. 2021, vol. 12 (SI). doi: 10.47743/ejes-2021-SI03
  42. Boschma R. Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience // Regional Studies. 2015, vol. 49 (5), pp. 733–751.
  43. Brakman S., Garretsen H., van Witteloostuijn A. The turn from just-in-time to just-in-case globalization in and after times of COVID-19: An essay on the risk re-appraisal of borders and buffers // Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2020, vol. 2 (1), 100034.
  44. Aiginger K., Rodrik D. Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century // Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. 2020, vol. 20 (2), pp. 189–207.
  45. Rodrik D. Industrial policy for economic development // VoxDevTalk. Podcast. https://voxdev.org/topic/macroeconomics-growth/industrial-policy-economic-development (дата обращения 24.12.2024).
  46. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy: Defining rationales, ends, and means // Research Policy. 2023, vol. 52 (6), 104765.
  47. Trippl M. et al. Addressing the regional dimension of open strategic autonomy and European green industrial policy. Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
  48. Luo Y., Van Assche A. The rise of techno-geopolitical uncertainty: Implications of the United States CHIPS and Science Act // Journal of international business studies. 2023, vol. 54 (8), pp. 1423–1440.
  49. Hool A., Helbig C., Wierink G. Challenges and opportunities of the European critical raw materials act // Mineral Economics. 2024, vol. 37 (3), pp. 661–668.
  50. Doloreux D., Frigon A. The innovation superclusters initiative in Canada: A new policy strategy? // Science and Public Policy. 2022, vol. 49 (1), pp. 148–158.
  51. Rodríguez-Pose A. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it) // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2018, vol. 11 (1), pp. 189–209.
  52. Мельникова Л.В. “Пространственно-нейтральная” и “локально-адресная” региональная политика: проблемы выбора // Регион: экономика и социология. 2014. № 1. С. 64–85.
  53. Melnikova L.V. “Spatial-neutral” and “local-address” regional policy: problems of choice // Region: economics and sociology. 2014, no. 1, pp. 64–85. (In Russ.)
  54. Rey S., Janikas M. Regional convergence, inequality, and space // Journal of Economic Geography. 2005, vol. 5 (2), pp. 155–176.
  55. MacKinnon D. et al. Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2022, vol. 15 (1), pp. 39–56.
  56. Johnston A., Huggins R. Europe’s semiconductor industry at a crossroads: Industrial policy and regional clusters // European Urban and Regional Studies. 2023, vol. 30 (3), pp. 207–213.
  57. The Biden administration embraces place-based industrial policy. https://www.economist.com/united-states/2023/07/27/the-biden-administration-embraces-place-based-industrial-policy (дата обращения 24.12.2024).
  58. Буфетова А.Н. Пространственное распределение экономической активности в России: основные тенденции постсоветского периода. Новосибирск: ИЭОПП СО РАН, 2023.
  59. Bufetova A.N. Spatial distribution of economic activity in Russia: main trends of the post-Soviet period. Novosibirsk: IEIE SB RAS, 2023. (In Russ.)
  60. Коломак Е.А. Пространственное развитие России в XXI в. // Пространственная экономика. 2019. № 4. С. 85–106.
  61. Kolomak E.A. Spatial development of Russia in the XXI century // Spatial Economics. 2019, no. 4, pp. 85–106. (In Russ.)
  62. Федеральный закон от 28.12.2024 г. № 523-ФЗ “О технологической политике в Российской Федерации и о внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации”. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202412280025?ysclid=m5yrdj8ln7751502867 (дата обращения 24.12.2024).
  63. Federal Law of 28.12.2024 no. 523-FZ “On Technological Policy in the Russian Federation and on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”. (In Russ.)
  64. Распоряжение Правительства РФ от 28.12.2024 г. № 4146–р “Об утверждении Стратегии пространственного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года с прогнозом до 2036 года”. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202501060001 (дата обращения 24.12.2024).
  65. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 28, 2024, no. 4146-r “On Approval of the Strategy of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 with a forecast up to 2036”. (In Russ.)
  66. Новый импульс Азиатской России: источники и средства развития: в 2-х т. Т. 1 / Под ред. В.А. Крюкова, Н.И. Суслова. Новосибирск: ИЭОПП СО РАН, 2023.
  67. New Impulse of Asian Russia: Sources and Means of Development: in 2 vols. Vol. 1 / Ed. by V.A. Kryukov, N.I. Suslov. Novosibirsk: IEIE SB RAS, 2023. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences