Challenges in diagnosing personality disorders: transitioning from categories to dimensions. Clinical case.

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article discusses the features of categorical and dimensional approaches to diagnosing personality disorders. The application of the ICD-10 and ICD-11 classifications is demonstrated using a clinical case of a patient with a personality disorder with mixed dissociative symptoms. The advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are considered, as well as the need to implement validated tools for assessing the severity of personality disorders in clinical practice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alena A. Katok

Kazan State Medical University

Email: alenaakatok@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9046-3532
SPIN-code: 4511-6293
Scopus Author ID: 57221772030

Assistant, Depart. of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology

Russian Federation, Kazan

Tangyul Z. Beybalaeva

Kazan State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: tanguel23@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5262-6852
SPIN-code: 7616-2990
Scopus Author ID: 57221771278

Assistant, Depart. of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology

Russian Federation, Kazan

References

  1. Zimmerman M, Morgan TA, Stanton K. The severity of psychiatric disorders. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(3):258–275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20569.
  2. Torgersen S. Prevalence, sociodemographics, and functional impairment. In: American psychiatric association publishing textbook of personality disorders. 3rd ed. AE Skodol, JM Oldham eds. American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2021. 143 р.
  3. Hopwood CJ, Kotov R, Krueger RF et al. The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis. Personality and Mental Health. 2017;12(1):82–86. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1408.
  4. Tyrer P, Reed GM, Crawford MJ. Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder. Lancet. 2015;385(9969):717–726. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61995-4.
  5. Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The personality inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment. 2017;30(2):154–169. doi: 10.1037/pas0000459.
  6. Clark LA, Nuzum H, Ro E. Manifestations of personality impairment severity: Comorbidity, course/prognosis, psychosocial dysfunction, and “borderline” personality features. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2018;21:117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.004.
  7. Weekers LC, Hutsebaut J, Kamphuis JH The level of perso-nality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning. Personality and Mental Health. 2019;13(1):3–14. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1434.
  8. Zimmermann J, Kerber A, Rek K et al. A brief but comprehensive review of research on the alternative DSM-5 model for perso-nality disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2019;21(92):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
  9. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. https:doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 (access date: 05.04.2023).
  10. Olajide K, Munjiza J, Moran P et al. Development and psychometric properties of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD). Journal of Personality Disorders. 2018;32(1):44–56. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_285.
  11. Bach B, Sellbom M, Kongerslev M et al. Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from DSM-5 traits: Initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2017;136(1):108–117. doi: 10.1111/acps.12748.
  12. Tyrer P, Mulder R, Kim YR, Crawford MJ. The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2019;15:481–502. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736.
  13. Huprich SK. Moving beyond categories and dimensions in personality pathology assessment and diagnosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;213(6):685–689. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.149.
  14. Bach B, First MB. Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3.
  15. Reed GM. Progress in developing a classification of perso-nality disorders for ICD-11. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):227–229. doi: 10.1002/wps.20533.
  16. Mendelevich VD, Ivashev AS, Gazizullin TR, Mendelevich EG. Psychopathological riddles of multiple personality disorder (dissociative identity disorder). The case of Daniel A. Neurology Bulletin. 2023;LV(1):79–92. (In Russ). DOI: https:.doi. org/10.17816/nb121212.
  17. International classification of diseases ICD-10. http://www.mkb10.ru (access date: 08.04.2023).
  18. MKB-11. Glava 06. Psihicheskie i povedencheskie rasstrojstva i narusheniya nejropsihicheskogo razvitiya. Statisticheskaya klassifikaciya. 2-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. M.: KDU, Universitetskaya kniga; 2022. 432 р. In Russ. doi: 10.31453/kdu. ru.91304.0172.
  19. Matusiewicz AK, Hopwood CJ, Banducci AN, Lejuez CW. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for personality disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2010;33(3):657–685. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2010.04.007.
  20. Cristea IA, Gentili C, Cotet CD et al. Efficacy of psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(4):319–328. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.4287.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 75562 от 12 апреля 2019 года.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies