Сlinical-epidemiological aspects of tick-borne encephalitis and tick-borne borreliosis in the Republic of Bashkortostan in the 2000s.



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme disease are the most widespread natural focal neuroinfections in the Russian Federation. The analysis of clinical and epidemiological data on 1421 cases of tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme disease (782 and 639, respectively) in the Republic of Bashkortostan from 2000 to 2023 was carried out. The clinical picture of 47 cases of focal tick-borne encephalitis and borreliosis of the nervous system (neuroborreliosis) is considered according to the analysis of 200 cases of acute Lyme disease. Most cases of tick-borne encephalitis infections are observed in the climatic and geographical zone of the Southern Urals of the Republic of Bashkortostan. The average long–term incidence of tick-borne encephalitis was 0.9 ± 0.5 cases, Lyme disease - 0.8± 0.4 per 100 thousand population. Focal forms of tick-borne encephalitis in the Republic of Bashkortostan in the 2000s were found in 6.0 ± 5.1% of patients. The neuroborreliosis clinic in 10 patients (5.5%) was characterized by the phenomena of monoradiculoneuropathy of various localization, sensory polyneuropathy, neuritis of the facial nerve, trigeminal nerve damage and meningeal syndrome. Thus, the Republic of Bashkortostan in the current 2000s is an area with an average level of epidemic danger for tick-borne encephalitis and a low level of epidemic danger for Lyme disease. The clinic of focal forms of tick-borne encephalitis manifests itself in the whole spectrum of possible neurological syndromes, up to the most severe with fatal outcome. The clinical picture of neuroborreliosis is characterized mainly by symptoms of damage to the peripheral nervous system.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Robert Alberovich Ibatullin

Bashkir State Medical University; Republican Clinical Hospital named after G.G.Kuvatov

Author for correspondence.
Email: robib@ufanet.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4980-1127
SPIN-code: 9114-8221

Candidate of Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Department of neurology of BSMU, doctor of the Department of neurology of the Kuvatov's RKB 

Russian Federation, 450008, Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 3 Lenin Street, Ufa, Russia; 450005, Ufa, Russia, Kuvatov's Republican Clinical Hospital, 132 Dostoevsky str.

Rim Valeevich Маgzhanov

Bashkur state medical university

Email: mcjanoff@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1246-4833
SPIN-code: 8300-6185

кафедра неврологии; ГОУ ВПО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет Росздрава»; Bashkirsky state medical university

Russian Federation, Ufa

Regina Ilnurovna Muftieva

РКБ им. Г.Г. Куватова

Email: ReginaMuftieva13@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-5848-5903
Russian Federation

References

  1. Department of Rospotrebnadzor for the Republic of Bashkortostan https://02.rospotrebnadzor.ru/content/173/34792/
  2. Noskov AK, Nikitin AY, Andaev EI, et al. Tick-borne virus encephalitis in the Russian Federation: features of epidemic process in steady morbidity decrease period, epidemiological condition in 2016 and the forecast for 2017. Problemy osobo opasnykh infektsii. 2017;(1):37-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2017-1-37-43
  3. Andaev EI, Nikitin AYa, Tolmacheva MI, et al. Epidemiological Situation on Tick-Borne Viral Encephalitis in the Russian Federation in 2022 and Forecast of its Development for 2023. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2023;(1):6-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2023-1-6-16
  4. Rudakova SA, Pen’evskaya NA, Blokh AI, et al. Review of the epidemiological situation on ixodic tick-borne borreliosis in the Russian Federation in 2010—2020 and prognosis for 2021. Problemy osobo opasnykh infektsii. 2021; 2:52-61. (in Russ.) doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2021-2-52-61.
  5. Konkova-Reidman AB, Zlobin VI. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of tick-borne encephalitis in the Southern Urals. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2011;103(4):92-95. (In Russ.)
  6. Yasyukevich VV, Titkina SN, Popov IO, Davidovich EA, Yasyukevich NV. Climate-dependent diseases and arthropod vectors: possible impact of climate change observed in Russia. Problems of ecological monitoring and ecosystem modeling. 2013.25.314-359.
  7. Gerasimov SG, Druzhinina TA, Karan LS, et al. The features of tick-borne encephalitis in the Yaroslavl region at the present stage. The problem of evolution of the infection // Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. 2014;19(4):37-44. doi: 10.17816/EID40819
  8. Luchinina SV, Stepanova ON., Pogodina VV., et al. The current epidemiological situation of tick-borne viral encephalitis in the Chelyabinsk region. Epidemiology and Vaccine prevention. 2014; 2(75):32-37.
  9. Wondim MA, Czupryna P, Pancewicz S, et al. Epidemiological Trends of Trans-Boundary Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Europe, 2000-2019. Pathogens. 2022 Jun 18;11(6):704. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11060704. PMID: 35745558; PMCID: PMC9228375.
  10. Yastrebov VK, Modern nosoareas of tick-borne encephalitis and tick-borne rickettsiosis in Siberia. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2006;5:131-136. (In Russ.) doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2006--131-136.
  11. Kolyasnikova NM, Chistyakova LG, Ponomareva AV, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of Tick-Borne encephalitis in the Sverdlovsk district over a 20-year period. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2023;22(2):37-46. (In Russ.) doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-2-37-46
  12. Verigina EV, Simonova EG, Chernyavskaya OP, Pakskina ND. The current epidemiological situation and some results of monitoring for tick-borne encephalitis in the Russian Federation. Epidemiology and vaccination. 2013;4(71):14–20. (In Russ.)
  13. Noskov AK, Andaev EI, Nikitin AY, et al. Tick-borne viral encephalitis morbidity rates in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Communication 1: Epidemiological situation on tick-borne viral encephalitis in 2018 and forecast for 2019. Problemy osobo opasnykh infektsii. 2019; 1: 74–80. doi.org/10.21055/0370–1069–2019–1–74–80.
  14. Nikitin AYa, Andaev EI, Yatsmenko EV, et al. Epidemiological situation on tick-borne viral encephalitis in the Russian Federation in 2019 and forecast for 2020. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2020;(1):33-42. (In Russ.) doi.org/10.210 55/0370-1069-2020-1-33-42
  15. Lyubeznova ON, Bondarenko AL. The clinical and epidemiological features of tick-borne encephalitis at the endemical region of Russia’s European part. Journal Infectology. 2016;8(2):32-39. (In Russ.)
  16. Aitov KA, Burdanova TM, Verkhozina MM, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Eastern Siberia: etiology, molecular epidemiology and peculiarities of the clinical course. Infektsionnye bolezni: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. 2018; 7(3): 31–40. doi.org/10.24411/2305–3496–2018–13005.
  17. Balakhonov SV, Pakskina ND, Nikitin AY, et al. Epidemiological situation on tick-borne viral encephalitis in the territory of the Russian Federation in 2012 and prognosis for 2013. Problemy osobo opasnykh infektsii 2013;(1):34-37. (In Russ.) doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2013-1-34-37
  18. Yastrebov VK, Rudakov NV, Rudakova SA. Epidemiology of vector-borne tick-borne infections in Russia. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2016;11 (284):8-12. (In Russ.)
  19. Kolyasnikova NM, Gerasimov SG, Ishmukhametov AA, Pogodina VV. Evolution of tick-borne encephalitis over an 80-year period: main manifestations, probable causes. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2020;19(3):78-88. (In Russ.) doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2020-19-3-78-88
  20. Pogodina VV, Levina LS, Skrynnik SM, et. al. Tick-borne encephalitis with fulminant course and lethal outcome in patients after plural vaccination. Voprosy virusologii. 2013;58(2):33–37 (in Russ).
  21. Nikolenko VV, Vorobyova NN. Merkuryeva EV, et al. Clinicoepidemiological features of tick-borne encephalitis course in Perm krai. Perm Medical Journal. 2020;37(3):18-25. doi: 10.17816/pmj37318-25
  22. Zawadzki R, Garkowski A, Kubas B, et al. Evaluation of Imaging Methods in Tick-Borne Encephalitis. Polish Journal of Radiology. 2017;82:742-747. doi.org/10.12659/PJR.903940
  23. Galunova АВ, Volkova LI, Clinical and MRi dissociation in focal form of acute tick-borne encephalitis (clinical case). Ural Medical Journal. 2016;143(10):13-17 (in Russ.)
  24. Baranova NS, Spirin NN, Druzhinina TA, et al. Tick-borne infections in the Yaroslavl region. Bulletin of the Ural State Medical Academy. 2010; 21:33.
  25. Bacon, R. M. et al. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 1992–2006. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2008 57,1-9.
  26. Koedel U, Fingerle V, Pfister HW. Lyme neuroborreliosis-epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Aug;11(8):446-56. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.121. Epub 2015 Jul 28. PMID: 26215621.
  27. Schwartz AM, Hinckley AF, Mead PS, Hook SA, Kugeler KJ. Surveillance for Lyme Disease - United States, 2008-2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Nov 10;66(22):1-12. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6622a1. PMID: 29120995; PMCID: PMC5829628.
  28. Schwenkenbecher, P., Pul, R., Wurster, U. et al. Common and uncommon neurological manifestations of neuroborreliosis leading to hospitalization. BMC Infect Dis 17, 90 (2017). doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2112-z
  29. Radzišauskienė, D., Urbonienė, J., Jasionis, A. et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of Lyme neuroborreliosis in adults and factors associated with polyradiculitis, facial palsy and encephalitis or myelitis. Sci Rep 13, 19881 (2023). doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47312-4

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 75562 от 12 апреля 2019 года.