Surgical treatment of patients with ureteral ruptures


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the causes of ureteral ruptures and the types surgical procedures used for their management. Over the period from 2006 to 2014, 7 patients with ureteral ruptures underwent surgical treatment in the Mechnikov N-WSMU clinic. All of them were males aged 50 to 71 years. In all cases, the ureter was injured during ureteroscopy and contact lithotripsy. In two patients the right ureter was cut off at the border of the upper and middle third, in four - at 3-4 cm below pyeloureteral segment, one patient diagnosed with a complete separation of the ureter from the kidney pelvis. Patients, who have suffered a detachment of the ureter in other hospitals, previously underwent surgical exploration of the retroperitoneal space, drainage of the kidney by pyelonephrostomy (5) and ureterocutaneostomy (1). In a case of a patient with an injury that occurred in our clinic, laparoscopic nephrectomy with autologous renal transplantation was carried out. Five patients with extended ureter defects underwent ileo-ureteroplasty. The patient with left ureterocutaneostomy underwent nephrovesical bypass. Patency of the upper urinary tract and kidney function were restored in all patients, all of them were relieved from external drains. The duration of the intestinal plastic averaged 160 minutes, laparoscopic nephrectomy with autologous transplantation - 210 min and nephrovesical bypass - 110 min. Blood transfusion was required only in autologous graft patient. The ureteral rupture is a serious complication of ureteral endourological procedures in upper urinary tract. It requires such complicated reconstructive operations as autologous transplantation of the kidney or intestinal ureteroplasty.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

B. K Komjakov

North-Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov

Department of Urology

B. G Guliev

North-Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov

Email: gulievbg@mail.ru
Department of Urology

References

  1. Gupta V., Sadasukhi T.C., Sharma K.K., Yadav R.G., Mathur R., Tomar V., Yadav S.S., Priyadarshi S., Gupta P. Complete ureteral avulsion. Sci. World J. 2005;28:125-127.
  2. Al-Awadi K., Kehinde E.O., Al-Hunayan A., Al-Khayat A. Iatrogenic ureteral injures: Incidence, aetiological factors and the effect of early management on subsequent outcome. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2005;37:235-241.
  3. de la Rosette J.J., Skrekas T., Segura J.W. Handling and prevention of complications in stone basketing. Eur. Urol. 2006;50:991-998.
  4. Abdelrahim A.F., Abdelmaguid A., Abuzeid H., Amin M., Mousa el-S., Abdelrahim F. Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: Factors associated with intaoperative adverse events. J. Endourol. 2008;22:277-280.
  5. Turunc T., Kuzgunbay B., Gul U., Ozkardez H. Ureteral avulsion due to lumbar disc hernia repair. Can. J. Urol. 2010;17(6):5478-5479.
  6. Trincheri A., Montanari E., Salvini P., Berardinelli L., Pisani E. Renal autotransplantation for complete ureteral avulsion following lumbar disk surgery. J. Urol. 2001;165(4):1210-1211.
  7. Shekarriz B., Lu H., Duh Q., Freise C.E., Stoller M.L. Laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for severe iatrogenic ureteral injures. Urology. 2001;58:540-543.
  8. Meng M.V., Freise C.E., Stoller M.L. Epanded experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for severe ureteral injury. J. Urol. 2003;169:1363-1367.
  9. Ge C., Li Q., Wang L., Jin F., Li Y., Wan J., Lan W., Liang P. Management of complete ureteral avulsion and literature review: A report on four cases. J. Endourol. 2011;25:323-326.
  10. Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г., Новиков А.И., Лебедев М.А., Аль-Исса А., Дорофеев С.Я. Интестинальная пластика мочеточников. Урология. 2005;2:24-28.
  11. Stein R.J., Turna B., Patel N.S., Weight C.J., Nguyen M.M., Shah G., Aron M., Fergany A.F., Gill I.S., Desai M.M. Laparoscopic assisted ileal ureter: technique, outcomes and comparison to the open procedure. J. Urol. 2009;182:1032-1039.
  12. Nissenkorn I., Gdor Y. Nephrovesical subcutaneous stent: an alternative to permanent nephrostomy. J. Urol. 2000;163:528-530.
  13. Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. Реканализация мочеточников. СПб., Невский диалект, 2010. 212 с.
  14. Lloyd S.N., Tiruronda P., Biyani C.S., Wah T.M., Irving H.C. The detour extra-anatomic stent - a permanent solution for benign and malignant ureteric obstruction? Eur. Urol. 2007:52:193-198.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies