Modification of two-stage technique of bracka with preservation and tubularization of the urethral plate for repair of proximal hypospadias


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Surgical treatment of proximal hypospadias is associated with a number of difficulties and unsuccessful repeated interventions. The changing approaches to the treatment of hypospadias with the revision of the attitude to urethral plate provide new opportunities in resolving this problem. Aim: to improve the results of surgical correction of hypospadias by creating “artificial” urethra that is very close to a native one in its functional qualities. Material and methods. From 2011 to 2017 г. two-stage urethroplasty using Bracka technique was used in 41 patients with a proximal hypospadias aged 1-16 years. From those, 32 patients were undergone to primary intervention (78%), and 9 boys previously had unsuccessful urethroplasty performed by different techniques (22%). Oral mucosa graft was used in 9 patients (22%), and in other 32 cases inner preputial skin was harvested (78%). The classical and modified Bracka technique were performed in 19 and 22 cases, respectively. The urethral plate was preserved in 22 cases and “artificial” urethra was created by its tubularization, which contributes to the reduction of the required length of the harvested prepucial graft. Results. The complication rate in patients after classical Bracka technique was 31.6% (n=6) in comparison with 4.5% in group of the modified urethroplasty (n=1). Thus, the efficiency of modified technique was significantly better than that of the classical intervention (р<0,05). Conclusion. The preservation and use of urethral plate for urethroplasty during the two-stage surgical correction of the proximal hypospadias allows to decrease the total length of “artificial” urethra and to improve the properties of the newly formed urethra.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. M Kagantsov

GU Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital, Syktyvkar; FGBOU VO «Pitirim Sorokin Syktyvkar State University»

Email: ilkagan@rambler.ru
Dr.Med.Sci, professor, professor of Department of Surgical diseases; Head of Department of Urology

R. V Surov

State Autonomous Institution of Healthcare, Kemerovskaya oblast, «Regional pediatric clinic hospital»

Email: rimvs@mail.ru
pediatric urologist-andrologist

References

  1. Manzoni G., Bracka A., Palminteri E., Marrocco G. Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom? BJU Int. 2004;94:1188-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2004.05128.x. PMID: 15613162.
  2. Papes D., Bracka A., Altarac S. Two-stage hypospadias repair with inner preputial layer Wolfe graft (Aivar Bracka repair). BJU Int. 2012; 110(3) :460-473. Doi: 10.1111/j. 1464-410X.2012.11304.x. PMID: 22776570
  3. Hadidi A.T. History of hypospadias: Lost in translation. J. Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(2):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.11.004 PMID: 27989535.
  4. Snodgrass W. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J. Urol. 1994;151(2):464-465. PMID: 8283561.
  5. Macedo A., Hoebeke P., Mouriquand P., Snodgrass W. Hypospadias dilemmas: A round table. J. Pediatr Urol. 2011;7(2): 145-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.11.009. PMID: 21236734.
  6. Nitkunan T., O’Malley K., Cuckow P.M., et al. The two-stage repair for severe primary hypospadias. Eur Urol. 2006;50(2):366-371. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.002 PMID: 16464530.
  7. Canning D.A., Long C.J. Hypospadias: Are we as good as we think when we correct proximal hypospadias? J. Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):196.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.05.002. PMID: 27296789.
  8. Коган М.И., Панченко С.Н., Митусов В.В., Сизонов В.В., Набока Ю.Л., Шангичев В.А. Микробная обсемененность тканей полового члена как фактор риска осложнений при лечении гипоспадии. Урология. 2011;2:43-48
  9. Акрамов Н.Р., Шарабидзе Г.Г. Парахирургические аспекты лечения мальчиков с гипоспадией (обзор литературы). Репродуктивное здоровье детей и подростков. 2010;5:39-48
  10. Bracka A. Hypospadias: the two-stage alternative. Br J. Urol. 1995;76(3):31-41.
  11. Каганцов И.М. Хирургическая коррекция тяжелых форм гипоспадии. Казанский медицинский журнал. 2012;93(2):255-260
  12. Faure A., Bouty A., Nyo Y.L., O’Brien M., Heloury Y. Two-stage graft urethroplasty for proximal and complicated hypospadias in children: A retrospective study. J. Pediatric Urol. 2016;12(Issue 5):286-286.
  13. Erol A., Baskin L.S., Li Y.W., Liu WH Anatomical studies of the urethral plate: why preservation of the urethral plate is important in hypospadias repair. BJU In. 2000; 85(6):728-734. PMID: 10759675
  14. Snodgrass W. T. et al. Histology of the urethral plate: implications for hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2000;164(3 Pt 2):988-989 PMID: 10958724.
  15. Tourchi A., Hoebeke P. Long-term outcome of male genital reconstruction in childhood. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(6 Pt B):980-989. PMID: 23665377 doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.03.017.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies