ЧАСТОТА И ЛОКАЛИЗАЦИЯ ПОЗИТИВНОГО ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОГО КРАЯ И ЕГО РОЛЬВ ПРОГНОЗИРОВАНИИ РЕЦИДИВА РАКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ


Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

To estimate the rate of positive surgical margin (SM) in radical retropubic
prostatectomy and its role in emergence of prostatic cancer (PC)
recurrence, we operated 216 PC patients aged 41 to 73 years. Most of
the patients had clinical stages T2a,b (41.8%) or T3a (35.6%). Stages Tl
and T3b were in 18.7 and 3.9% patients, respectively .A positive SM was
Г registered in 68 of 193 patients (35.2%). Thirty six (52.9%) patients had
a focal (solitary or short) SM, thirty two (47.1%) had a long SM. The
recurrence occurred in 31 (16.1%) patients who, as a rule, had long SM.
Recurrence-free one-year survival in 104 patients who had no SM
reached 82%, in 34 patients with focal SM (group 2) it was 83%. Such
three-year survival in group 1 and 2 was 75 and 73.6%, respectively.
Thus, recurrence-free survival in organ-limited process and short SM
differed little within 3 years. The period between 12 and 24 months of
follow-up is most risky in relation to detection of recurrence in short SM.
The group of patients with long SM had maximal number of recurrences.

Об авторах

Е И Велиев

Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования,Москва

Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования,Москва

С Б Петров

Военно-медицинская академия, Санкт-Петербург

Военно-медицинская академия, Санкт-Петербург

О Б Лоран

Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования,Москва

Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования,Москва

Список литературы

  1. Park E. L., Dalkin В., Escobar C., Nagle R. B. Site-specific positive margins at radical prostatectomy: assessing cancer-control benefits of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle on a side with cancer on biopsy. Br. J. Urol. Int. 2003; 91 (3): 219-222.
  2. Epstein J. I. Incidence and significance of positive margins inradical prostatectomy specimens. Urol. Clin. N. Am.1996; 23 (4): 651-663.
  3. Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K. L., Civantos F., Soloway M. S. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J. Urol (Baltimore). 2002; 167 (6): 2453-2456
  4. Ayala A. G., Ro J. Y., Babaian R. et al. The prostatic capsule: does it exist? Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1989; 13 (1): 21-27.
  5. Epstein J. L. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection: The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1990; 14 (3): 621-626.
  6. Epstein J. L., Carmichael M. J., Pizov G., Walsh P. С. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term followup. J. Urol.(Baltimore) 1993; 150 (1): 135-141.

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML

© ООО «Бионика Медиа», 2004

Данный сайт использует cookie-файлы

Продолжая использовать наш сайт, вы даете согласие на обработку файлов cookie, которые обеспечивают правильную работу сайта.

О куки-файлах