PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF THE PROTECTION OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED IN LITERARY AND OTHER WORKS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT WORKS IN SOUTH AFRICA


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of civil, criminal and administrative remedies in case of copyright infringements of literary and other works containing scientific information in one of the BRICS countries - South Africa, made through the prism of the provisions of the acting Constitution of 1996; statutory law (acts) of this country: in the field of copyright (Copyright Act, 1978, as amended 2008), judicial system (Renaming of Court Act, 2008; Small Claims Courts Act, 1984, as amended 2005; Magistrates' Courts Act, 1944, as amended 2017, etc., Arbitration Act, 1965), procedural rules of courts (e.g. Uniform Rules of Court, 1999; Criminal Law (Sentencing) Amendment Act, 2007), e-commerce (Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 2002), judicial precedents developed within the framework of the current case law and statutory law and the provisions of the doctrine. The study based on the use of such methods of scientific knowledge as: general scientific dialectical, historical, comparative legal analysis, etc. The author proceeds from the subjective-objective adjustment of processes and phenomena. One of the conclusions of the research is the idea that the system of procedural remedies and methods of protection of scientific information in the South African legal order combines the use of civil, criminal and administrative remedies, while relatively new methods of dispute resolution, such as arbitration, are not widely used.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ksenia Mikhailovna Belikova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: BelikovaKsenia@yandex.ru
Dr of Law, Professor. Position: professor. Department: Civil Law and Proceedings and International Private Law chair. E

References

  1. Беликова К.М. Правовое регулирование производства, распространения, внедрения и защиты научной информации и инноваций в странах БРИКС на примере ЮАР. // Юридические исследования. - 2019. - № 5. doi: 10.25136/2409-7136.0.0.29541. URL: http://e-nota-bene.ru/lr/article_29541.html (дата обр.: 02.05.2019) (в печати)
  2. Беликова К.М. Процессуальные аспекты защиты научной информации в контексте действия законодательства об интеллектуальной собственности в странах БРИКС: опыт Индии // Право и политика. - 2019. - № 5. doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.0.0.29684. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/plp/article_29684.html (в печати).
  3. Copyright Act № 98 of 1978. // Government Gazette. Cape Town, 30 June 1978. Vol. 156. No. 6092. URL: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201504/act-98-1978.pdf (дата обращения: 09.04.2019).
  4. 1 SA 1052 (E)] и [1983 1 SA 608 (C)]. Цит. по: Wim Alberts. Copyright Infringement. // De Rebus. - May 2008. - P. 52. URL: http://www.derebus.org.za/de-rebus-pdf-download/ (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  5. Herman Blignaut (Spoor & Fisher). Copyright litigation in South Africa: overview. 01-Oct-2018. URL: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-012-1995? transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&comp=pluk&bhcp=1 (дата обращения: 01.05.19)
  6. Counterfeit Goods Act, 1997 (No. 37 of 1997). // Government Gazette. Cape Town, 1 October 1997. No. 18324. Vol. 388. URL: https://www.thedti.gov.za/busi-ness_regulation/acts/counterfeit_goods_act.pdf (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  7. Jacques Stemmet, Abduraouph Camaar. South Africa: Copyright 2019. 02/10/2018. URL: https://iclg.com/ practice-areas/copyright-laws-and-regulations/south-africa (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  8. [(1976) КРС719] Цит. по: Международное бюро ВОИС. Пиратство и прогресс в средствах судебной защиты. WIРО/СR/КL/86/8. URL: https://helpiks.org/7-51854.html (дата обращения: 03.05.2019)
  9. Case No 12923/03 и [1991 2 SA 455 (W)] Цит. по: Herman Blignaut. Op. cit.
  10. Copyright Guidelines for Staff & Students of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (WITS): Copyright Infringement - Penalties. URL: https://libguides. wits.ac.za/c.php?g=145347&p=953428 (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  11. Dean Handbook of South African Copyright Law (1987) 1-58A.
  12. Magistrates' Courts Act, 1944 [No 32 of 1944]. As amended 2017. URL: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/ files/gcis_document/201505/act-32-1944.pdf (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  13. Small Claims Courts Act, 1984 [No 61 of 1984] as amended 2005. URL: http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/ acts/1984-061.pdf (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  14. Phillip de Wet. You will soon be able to claim more in the Small Claims Court. // Business Insider SA. Mar 06, 2019. URL: https://www.businessinsider.co.za/you-will-soon-be-able-to-claim-up-to-r20000-in-the-small-claims-court-2019-3 (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  15. Small Claims Courts offer a quicker and easier way of resolving disputes that involve amounts limited to R20 000 [as from 01 Apr 2019]. URL: http://www.justice.gov.za/ scc/scc.htm (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  16. Small claims court. June 01, 2017. URL: https://www.legalwise.co.za/help-yourself/quicklaw-guides/small-claims-court (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  17. What Types of Cases Can Be Resolved in Small Claims Court? Determine whether your case is eligible for small claims court. URL: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/types-cases-for-small-claims-court-29918.html (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  18. Courts in South Africa. URL: http://www.justice.gov. za/about/sa-courts.html (дата обращения: 01.05.2019)
  19. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, as adopted on 8 May 1996 and amended on 11 October 1996 by the Constitutional Assembly. URL: ISBN http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/constitution/SAConstitution-web-eng.pdf (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  20. Jurisdiction of South African courts. June 01, 2017. URL: https://www.legalwise.co.za/help-yourself/legal-arti-cles/jurisdiction-south-african-courts (дата обращения: 02.05.2019)
  21. Meintjes-Van der Walt, Singh (et al.) Introduction to South African Law: Fresh Perspectives 2nd ed. - Cape Town: Heinemann, 2011,142. Цит. по: Amanda Barratt and Pamela Snyman. update by Salona Lutchman. UPDATE: Researching South African Law. March 2018. URL: http://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/South_Africa1. html#_edn40 (дата обращения: 08.05.2019)
  22. The SA Board for Sheriffs. About Us. URL: http://www.sheriffs.org.za/aboutus/ (дата обращения: 05.05.2019)
  23. Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 2002 [No. 25 of 2002]. URL: https://www.gov.za/sites/de-fault/files/gcis_document/201409/a25-02.pdf (дата обращения: 04.05.2019)
  24. Arbitration Act, 1965 (No. 42 of 1965). URL: http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1965-042.pdf (дата обращения: 16.05.2015).
  25. Garreth Wong and Louise Lanzkron (Bird & Bird LLP). Speed Read: Arbitrability of IP disputes - why this can be an issue and ways to resolve it. April 4 2017. URL: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7d5e86a6-f83f-42df-8d3a-29cb3c1ec349 (дата обр.: 05.05.2019)
  26. Беликова К.М. Правовое регулирование трудовых отношений, осложненных иностранным элементом, в странах БРИКС = Legal regulation of labor relations with a foreign element within the BRICS countries : учебное пособие / К.М. Беликова. - М.: РУДН, 2017. - С. 198-203 (256 с.).
  27. Национальные особенности и перспективы унификации частного права стран БРИКС: учебник: в 2 т. - Т. 2 / К.М. Беликова, Н.В. Бадаева, В.Ю. Ифраимов, М.А. Ахмадова, Н.О. Илларионова и др., под ред. д.ю.н., проф. К.М. Беликовой. - М.: РУДН, 2015. - С. 512, 514 (582 с.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies