详细
Purpose of the study. The article examines the problems of assessing information about the involvement of a suspect, accused of committing a crime in court decisions on detention. The significant prevalence of complaints in accordance with Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, petitions for the application of preventive measures on the basis of a court decision to increase the judicial workload gives rise to haste in their consideration and resolution, gives rise to stereotyped approaches to the drafting of court decisions on them. The article analyzes judicial statistics and the practice of satisfying and refusing to satisfy the investigator's petitions to choose a preventive measure in the form of detention. Conclusions. The author concludes that the law should prohibit detention judges from considering and deciding the merits of a criminal case against those accused who have been detained or extended by the same judge.