The 2020 Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Parliamentarism

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of the study. The 2020 amendments to the Constitution of our country are of great importance. Their volume, nature, and essence indicate, from our point of view, in fact, a new edition of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation. The amendments in one way or another affected almost all the most important state-legal institutions. This fully applies to such of them as parliamentarism. And it is the analysis of innovations here that is the purpose of this article. First of all, the author’s concise definition of parliamentarism is presented - the supremacy of parliament. It was emphasized that the attitude to this institution in our country was different. So, under socialism, it was actually denied. The revival of parliamentarism began in the 90s of the last century, which was most vividly reflected in the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993. In the Amendments to it in 2020, innovations concerning parliamentarism were expressed primarily in the provisions concerning the organization of the Supreme People’s Representation of Russia – the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, especially the status of its members; the functions of the national parliament, and first of all the long-established control authority; formation of a number of the most important state bodies. The main issue of parliamentarism is the relationship between the parliament and the government. conclusions. The analysis of the 2020 Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation indicates that parliamentarism is and will be one of the most important institutions of national statehood. He is the most important guarantor of ensuring the supremacy of the Federal Assembly – the Parliament of Russia. The amendments follow the path of increasing the status of parliamentarism, improving it, and first of all in the sphere of its control powers. When preparing the article, first of all, three main scientific research methods were used–dogmatic, historical, comparative.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yuriy L. Shulzhenko

Institute of the State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: shulzhenko_yu@mail.ru

Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor, Chief Researcher, Department of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Justice

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Avakyan S.A. The Federal Assembly is the parliament of Russia. Russian legal publishing house. M., 1999. - 432 Р.
  2. Baglai M.V. Constitutional law of the Russian Federation. Textbook for High Schools. 2nd ed. Norm. M., 1999. – 776 Р.
  3. Kovryakova E.V. Parliamentary control: foreign experience and Russian practice. Gorodets. M., 2005.
  4. Korf S.A. Russian state law. P 1. Supplier of the court of His Majesty A.L.A. Levenson, Gelsinfors., 1915. - 315 Р.
  5. Lazarevsky N.I. Russian state law. T.1. Constitutional law. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, 1913. - 672 Р.
  6. Nudenko L.A. Constitutional law of Russia. Yurayt. M., 2011. - 581 p.
  7. Parliamentary law of Russia. Tutorial. Lawyer. M., 1999.
  8. parliamentary law. Textbook. Ed. HE. Bulakov. Eksmo. M., 2006 - 656 p.
  9. Parliamentary law of Russia. Monograph. Ed. Khabrieva T.Ya. The State Duma. M., 2013. - 400 p.
  10. Sokolov K.N. Parliamentarism. Experience of the legal theory of the parliamentary system. Printing house «Printed Labor», St. Petersburg, 1912. - 432 p.
  11. Khabrieva T.Ya., Klishas A.A. Thematic commentary to the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation dated March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ on “On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public authorities”. Norm. M., 2020. - 240 p.
  12. Chirkin V.E. Constitutional law of Russia: textbook. 6th ed. Norm. M., 2009. - 495 p.
  13. Shulzhenko Yu.L. Russian theory of parliamentarism. Yurlitinform. M., 2018. - 168 p.
  14. Cotemporary Europa - Haundmills Besingstokc Hampshire and Ljndon. 2000 P.127-130.
  15. Parliamentsrecht und Parliamentspraxis in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland/B.N.Y.1989.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies