Evolution of the system of consultative (advisory) bodies under the President of the Russian Federation
- Authors: Lipatov V.D.1, Melnikov S.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS
- Issue: Vol 18, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 19-24
- Section: Public Law (State Law) Sciences
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2072-3164/article/view/694130
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2025-18-5-19-24
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YBNEDM
- ID: 694130
Cite item
Abstract
The purpose of the research. The work focuses on the study of evolutionary processes that affected the system of consultative (advisory) bodies operating under the President of the Russian Federation. The study examines the historical determinacy of the formation of these bodies, and also provides an analytical assessment of their functional structure and role during the formation of the institution of the presidency in Russia. Particular attention is paid to identifying the specific characteristics inherent in consultative (advisory) bodies in the early stages of their development. The transformation and abolition of consultative (advisory) structures also occupy an important place in the study, since changes in the political situation often lead to the need to revise existing institutions of power.
Results. The study concluded that in the context of globalization and rapid development of information technology, the role of consultative (advisory) structures is becoming increasingly important, as they contribute to the adaptation of public policy to modern challenges and requirements. It was found that consultative (advisory) bodies not only contribute to more effective governance, but also serve as a channel for taking into account the opinion of civil society, which in turn increases the legitimacy of power. There is also an obvious need to improve the efficiency of the system of consultative (advisory) bodies, in particular, improving feedback between government bodies and all participants in the process could significantly increase the level of implementation of the proposed initiatives. In this regard, the creation of open platforms on which the results of the work of consultative (advisory) bodies will be discussed, as well as recommendations for their optimization will be developed, can become an important stage in their subsequent evolution.
Full Text
About the authors
Valentin D. Lipatov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Author for correspondence.
Email: lipatov.valentin@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 6322-2592
postgraduate student of the Department of Constitutional Law of the M.M. Speransky Faculty of Law of the Institute of Law and National Security
Russian Federation, MoscowSergey A. Melnikov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS
Email: melnikov-sa@ranepa.ru
SPIN-code: 5341-4761
Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Scientific Supervisor, Professor of the Department of Constitutional Law at the M.M. Speransky Law Faculty of the Institute of Law and National Security, Chief Researche
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowReferences
- Baranov N.A. Modern Russian Politics: a textbook for universities. N.A. Baranov, B.A. Isaev. 3rd ed., reprint. and add. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House, 2025. 432 p. (Bachelor’s Degree. Academic Course). ISBN 978–5–534–21512–0.-Text: electronic. Yurayt Educational Platform [website]. URL: https://urait.ru/bcode/575011 (accessed: 06.08.2025).
- Emelyanov S.V. Modern Trends in the Development of Advisory Bodies under the President of the Russian Federation. Social and Political Research. 2021. No. 9. Pp. 34–40.
- Teplyakova O.A. On the Status of Advisory and Coordination Bodies in the Russian Federation. O.A. Teplyakova, A.A. Kostyukov. Bulletin of Tyumen State University. Social and Economic Research. 2021. Vol. 7. No. 2 (26). Pp. 122–134. doi: 10.21684/2411-7897-2021-7-2-122-134.
- Chebotarev G.N. Mutually Responsible Partnership of the State and Society. G.N. Chebotarev. State and Law. 2019. No. 10. Pp. 26–34.
Supplementary files


