Extremism: Difficulties of Definitions

In the modern society, there are a number of phenomena that have a complex semantic component. One of such phenomenon is extremism. Scientists, politicians, representatives of public institutions, as well as law enforcement agencies interpret this phenomenon in different ways. What is the difference between these interpretations, and most importantly, why do they arise? The purpose of this study is to study some of the limitations associated with the definition and perception of the phenomenon of «extremism» from the semantic, political and legal points of view. We believe that the main reason for this is the (mis)perception of extreme acts committed, meaning that even the «ideal» legal definition of extreme acts is clearly not effective enough in combating extremism in society. We need to raise public awareness of the highlighted issue. Special services, police, prosecutors, courts, etc. are obliged to constantly improve effective methods of preventing, detecting and combating extremist phenomena within a legally acceptable framework. From a legal point of view, it is impossible to combat the phenomenon of «extremism» with the help of coercive and other institutions of the national security system. But even when, as a result of some political or social consensus, some extremist phenomena and actions become part of national criminal codes, it is not much easier to deal with extremism. The main reason is the distorted perception of committed extreme actions. This study examines some of the problems that explain the semantic, political and legal characteristics and limitations in the perception and definition of the phenomenon of «extremism».

personality, state, politics, extremism, definitions of extremism