Problematic Aspects of the Rules for the Production of Investigative Actions

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is some problematic aspects of the rules for the production of investigative actions. The authors point out that these rules have lost their relevance, clarity, and are in dire need of reform, harmonization, unification of the adopted changes both in the legislation of our country and international documents.

The objectives of the study are to analyze the rules for the production of investigative actions and the need for a terminological definition of the concept of investigative actions, their classification, as well as compiling their exact list, distinguishing them from other procedural actions and coercive measures. An analysis of the general rules for the production of investigative actions allows us to identify problematic aspects and improve the norms of legislation. The authors classify the rules into groups for a more accurate understanding and use of them in procedural practice.

Conclusions: we found that bringing the rules of conducting investigative actions in line is necessary, both for strengthening and functioning of the system of administration of justice, and for strengthening confidence in the public authorities administering justice. At the same time, to create conditions for a more complete realization of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the course of the administration of justice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alberd M. Sheriyev

Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: Sheriev74@mail.ru

Cand.Sci.(Law), Police Lieutenant Colonel, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Special Disciplines, North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Studies (branch)

Russian Federation, Nalchik, KBR

Nikolay P. Golyandin

Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: qnp2005@rambler.ru

Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Special Disciplines, North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Studies (branch)

Russian Federation, Nalchik, KBR

Alla V. Zhukova

Educational Institution North Caucasian College of Innovative Technologies

Email: skaiton@mail.ru

Dr.Sci.(Pedagogics), Professor, Director of the private professional educational institution

Russian Federation, Pyatigorsk

References

  1. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ (as amended on July 1, 2021) // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. No. 249. December 22, 2001.
  2. Bravilova E.A. On the general rules for the production of investigative actions // Siberian criminal procedure and forensic readings. - 2020. - No. 1 (27). - P. 16-30.
  3. Kovalenko I. V. Concept, signs, types and general rules for the production of investigative actions // Young scientist. - 2019. - No. 11 (249). - P. 64-67.
  4. Koshcheeva K.I. To the question of the quality of compiling protocols of investigative actions // Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law. - 2021. - No. 1 (54). - P. 64-69.
  5. The prosecutor explains - Prosecutor's Office of the Chelyabinsk Region URL https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/ru/web/proc_74/activity/legal-education/explain?item=33371906 (accessed 01/10/2023).
  6. Usova Yu.I., Ipatova A.Yu. General rules for the production of investigative actions: problems of application // Central Scientific Bulletin. - 2020. - V. 5. - No. 11 (100). - P. 32-34.
  7. Khaidarov A.A. Problems of obtaining by the investigator (inquirer) permission to conduct a search and seizure in a pawnshop // Journal of Russian Law. 2019. - No. 9. - P. 139.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies