Interests of owners in the norms of obligation law
- Authors: Ryzhik A.V.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property
- Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, branch Smolensk
- Issue: Vol 16, No 6 (2023)
- Pages: 58-62
- Section: Private Law (Civil) Sciences
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2072-3164/article/view/623571
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GOORNH
- ID: 623571
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article discusses issues related to participants in obligatory legal relations, an authorized person (interested owner) who has the right to demand from the obligated person the proper fulfillment of contractual obligations assumed, and in case of failure to fulfill them, to apply to the court for appropriate judicial protection.
As a result of causing tortious harm or illegal enrichment, the injured person becomes empowered and interested in demanding from the offender (the obligated person) the implementation of certain positive actions to compensate for damage, restore the original position, and return what was illegally obtained and/or saved.
Keywords
Full Text
About the authors
Andrey V. Ryzhik
Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property; Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, branch Smolensk
Author for correspondence.
Email: aspirant8381@mail.ru
Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor of the Department of Civil and Entrepreneurial Law, Department of Jurisprudence
Russian Federation, Moscow; SmolenskReferences
- Andreev Yu. N. Obligations in Russian civil law: theory and legislation. M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. P. 132 – 141; Prokopyev A.Yu. Civil legal relations: concept, elements and types. M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. pp. 77 – 83.
- Alexandrov N.G. Law and legality during the period of extensive construction of communism. M., 1961. P. 227 – 228.
- Kechekyan S.F. Legal relations in a socialist society. M., 1958. P. 60.
- Sinaisky V.I. Russian civil law. M., 2002. P. 308 – 309, 330 – 331.
- Shershenevich G.F. Textbook of Russian civil law. Vol. 2. M.: Statute, 2005. P. 69.
- Novitsky I.B., Lunts L.A. General doctrine of obligation. M., 1950. P. 94 – 97.
Supplementary files
