Judicial Detention Decisions: Problems Encountered When They Are Made

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Purpose of the study. The article gives the concept of judicial decisions on detention. The problems discussed in the literature when making these judgments are analyzed. Conclusions. Based on the study of the practice of issuing the considered decisions by the courts, their shortcomings are characterized through the prism of the requirements of the law and criminal procedural means for their prevention and elimination are shown.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Lyubov Kalinkina

National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University

Email: ldkal@rambler.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute Saransk, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Chervotkin A.S. New clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the application of preventive measures // Criminal process. 2020. No. 8. P. 24.
  2. Davletov A.A., Azarenok N.V. A turn in the practice of choosing detention as a measure of restraint? // Russian justice. 2018. No. 9. pp. 59-60.
  3. Skabelin S.I. The totality of data that is sufficient to select a measure of restraint in criminal proceedings // Lawyer. 2015. No. 11. P. 39.
  4. Shadrina E.G. On the issue of the need to expand the permissible limits of judicial control (on the example of choosing a measure of restraint in the form of detention) // Russian judge. 2018. No. 5. pp. 41-42.
  5. Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-103/2021.
  6. Archive of the Leninsky district court of Saransk. 2021 // Material No. 3/2-104/2021.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу