The Right as a Reference and a Reference to the «Right»

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The purpose of the research. The author of the article examines how law and reference to law, by their nature, can be tools of manipulation. At the beginning of the article, the theoretical concept of the relationship between law and reference, as a means of transmitting information in the processes of functioning and human perception of law, is presented. Then examples are given of the use of references to quasi-legal provisions and provisions of the law for the purpose of misleading. The paper notes that there are various types of misleading references: a misleading reference to «law» a misleading reference to a declarative rule of law, a misleading reference to a rule of law with a counterintuitive execution and a misleading reference to the regulatory system. Results. The practical significance of the study consists in describing the mechanisms of various types of misleading references (a phenomenon that I propose to consider as an independent object of study of legal science), the presence of which discredits any legal system, i.e. is a direct threat to legal stability. The author hopes that the methodology developed by him, to the extent that the format of the article allows, will make specific misleading references the subject of research by legal experts in the field and stimulate the development of such methods of law-making and revision of legislation that will reduce the likelihood of using texts of normative acts for the purpose of misleading.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Kirill Grishin

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: 7tgks7@gmail.com
Código SPIN: 7140-9150

postgraduate student, Department of Theory of State and Law and Political Science, Faculty of Law

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Akhmadulin I.R. Italian strikes in Russia // Sociological Research, 2020. No. 10. pp. 95-105.
  2. Bolshak A.V., Makoedova N.V. On the question of the role of cultural reference in translation // Foreign languages in the context of intercultural communication. 2021. No.XIII. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-roli-kulturnoy-otsylki-v-perevode (accessed 05/15/2024).
  3. Bondurant E. The Senate Filibuster: The Politics of Destruction // Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, LLP, 2010.
  4. Gadamer X-G. Truth and Method: Fundamentals of Philos. Hermeneutics. M.: Progress, 1988. 704 p.
  5. Gurvich G. D. Philosophy and Sociology of Law: Selected works. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, Publishing House of the Faculty of Law of St. Petersburg State University, 2004. 848 p.
  6. Derrida J. Deconstruction: texts and interpretation. Minsk: Ekonompress, 2021. 320 p.
  7. Kelsen G. Law, state and justice in the pure doctrine of law // Jurisprudence, No. 2 (307), 2013. pp. 226-240.
  8. Cross R. Precedent in English law. Moscow : Yurid. lit., 1985. 238 p.
  9. Krushanov A. A. The concept of "management" in a cybernetic context // Vox. The Philosophical Journal. 2017. No.23. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-upravlenie-v-kiberneticheskom-kontekste (date of access: 05/14/2024).
  10. McCloud Ya. Legal Theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012. 264 p.
  11. Man M. The dark side of democracy. St. Petersburg: Peter Publishing House, LLC, 2023. 896 p.
  12. Novikova E. Y. Discursively conditioned cultural transfer in the translation of the guidebook // Bulletin of the Volga. Series 2: Linguistics. 2014. No.3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diskursivno-obuslovlennyy-kulturnyy-transfer-v-perevode-putevoditelya (date of appeal: 05/15/2024).
  13. Petrazhitsky L.I. On the motives of human actions, especially on ethical motives and their varieties. St. Petersburg: E.L. Porokhovshchikova Type, 1904. 75 p.
  14. Radbruch G. Philosophy of Law. Moscow: International Relations, 2004. 240 p.
  15. Reisner M.A. The theory of L. I. Petrazhitsky, Marxism and social ideology. St. Petersburg: Type. T-va "Societies. Benefit", 1908. 239 p.
  16. Semik A.A. Unrealizability of penal norms as a feature of the development of the system of places of deprivation of liberty in the history of Russia of the XVIII-XX centuries // Theory and practice of social development. 2016. No.7. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nerealizuemost-ugolovno-ispolnitelnyh-norm-kak-osobennost-razvitiya-sistemy-mest-lisheniya-svobody-v-istorii-rossii-xviii-hh-vv (date of application: 03/24/2024).
  17. Schiavone A. K-9 Catch-22: The Impossible Dilemma of Using Police Dogs in Suspicion of Suspects // University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 3, 2018.
  18. Ferry E. Criminal sociology. M.: Infra-M, 2005. 658 p.
  19. Finnis D. Natural law and natural rights. M.: IRSEN, socium, 2019. 554 p.
  20. Frolova E.A. Methodology and philosophy of law: from Descartes to the Russian neo-Kantians : monograph. M.: Prospect, 2017. 304 p.
  21. Shipan Ch. A War of Words: Explaining the Duration of the Filibuster in the U.S. Senate, 1919-1993 // University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Political Science, 2006.
  22. Schneer A. Captivity: soldiers and officers of the Red Army in German captivity. Moscow: Fifth Rome, 2022. 608 p.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies