The precedent system as a source of law in the Russian Federation: the theoretical and legal analysis

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Judicial precedents are court decisions regarding specific cases, which then become the norm for considering similar cases. In world practice, judicial precedents are one of the sources of law. The development of this institution in Russia raises certain questions, but the introduction of the precedent system into the legal proceedings of the Russian Federation has its significant advantages.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Ivan Danilov

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: dpranepa@mail.ru
Código SPIN: 5042-9179

Cand. Sci. (Law), Rector Assistant, Associate Professor, Head of issues at the Department of Management of state and municipal property, Director of the scientific and educational center «Management of State and Municipal Facilities»

Rússia, Moscow

Denis Petrov

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: petrov-dy@ranepa.ru
Código SPIN: 1908-4025

Senior lecturer of issues at the Department of Management state and municipal property

Rússia, Moscow

Ivan Gusaim

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: GusaimIvan1997@yandex.ru
Código SPIN: 7930-3460

Postgraduate student of the Department of Legal Support for National Security of the Law Faculty named after M. M. Speransky of the Institute of Law and National Security

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation, adopted by popular vote on 12.12.1993. Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2014. No. 31. Article 4398.
  2. Federal Constitutional Law «On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation» dated 21.07.1994 No. 1-FKZ (as amended on 14.12.2015). Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2015. No. 51. Article 7229.
  3. Federal Constitutional Law «On the Judicial System of the Russian Federation» dated 31.12.1996 No. 1-FKZ (as amended on 05.02.2014). Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2014. No. 6. Article 551.
  4. Federal Constitutional Law «On the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation» dated 05.02.2014 No. 3-FKZ (as amended on 15.02.2016). Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2016. No. 7. Art. 896.
  5. Aranovsky K. V. The Fate of Judicial Precedent in Romano-Germanic Law. K. V. Aranovsky, S. D. Knyazev. Journal of Constitutional Justice (editor-in-chief — S. D. Knyazev). 2013. No. 4. Pp. 30–38.
  6. Gushchina N. A. Judicial Precedent in the Russian Legal System: History, Theory, Practice. N. A. Gushchina, M. S. Glukhoedov. Modern Law. 2013. No. 2. Pp. 79–84.
  7. Dvornikova O. A. Administrative precedent in the system of sources of law: theoretical and legal research: dissertation … candidate of legal sciences: 12.00.01. O. A. Dvornikova; [Place of protection: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation]. Moscow. 2009. 203 p.
  8. Kazakov V. N. Theory of State and Law: textbook. Scientific ed. R. V. Shagieva. Moscow: Publishing house of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. 362 p.
  9. Kolesnikova V. V. Judicial precedent in the system of Russian law. Bulletin of the Magistracy. 2014. No. 5(32). Volume II. Pp. 72–75.
  10. Marchenko M. N. Comparative law. General part. M 29. Textbook for law schools. Moscow: Publishing house «Zertsalo», 2001. 560 p.
  11. Law, law, judicial precedent: Russian version: Monograph. Moscow: IG «Yurist», 2008.
  12. Bogdanovskaya I. Yu. Judicial precedent — a source of law? State and law. 2002. No. 12. P. 7.
  13. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100. British and Irish Legal Information Institute [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1932/100.html.
  14. Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 3 All ER 77, [1966] 1 WLR 1234. United Settlement [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.uniset.ca/other/cs2/19661WLR1234.html.
  15. Ambrasienė, D., Cirtautienė, S. The Role of Judicial Precedent in the Court Practice of Lithuania. Jurisprudence. 2009. 2(116). Pp. 61–78.
  16. Holland, J., Webb, J. Learning Legal Rules: A Student’s Guide to Legal Method and Reasoning, 8th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 415 p.
  17. Holmes, Jr., O. W. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1881. 422 p.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar