Problems of Origin of Municipal Property Rights as an Element of Economic Public Order

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article examines the issues of the emergence of municipal property rights as an element of economic public order. The concept of economic public policy is linked to the concept of the common good and the public interest. It involves the impact of the state on the economy, the development of economic policy, state regulation of economic relations, including the restriction of private property, the social obligations of the owner to society, the balance of individual rights and freedoms and public interests. Economic public order aims to create a managed economy. The economic public order includes imperative and prohibitive norms that restrict the behavior of private individuals in the general interest. The right of municipal property itself represents a set of norms of this type that determine the procedure for the possession, use and disposal of municipal property by subjects of municipal power in the interests of the municipality. The purpose of the present study is to consider emerging issues in this area related to understanding the essence of municipal property relations. In this regard, three components of property relations play a key role. Firstly, the object (material or intangible), about which the property (legal) relations of subjects are formed, i.e., the material content of property; secondly, the actual system (structure) of traditional and/or property (legal) relations between subjects; thirdly, the economic implementation of the established traditional and/or property (legal) relations between subjects at the micro level through specific methods of appropriation of objects and at the macro level through the functioning of the local economy subsystem in the aggregate of its elements. Each of these components is important in terms of ensuring the effective functioning of the form of ownership. Based on the study, the author comes to the conclusion that, as a legal institution, the right of municipal property as a whole can be considered formed - this form of ownership is recognized by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, regulations have been adopted that establish a specific legal regime for the institution of municipal property.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Victor Butchenko

Volgas State University of Water Transport

Email: kipkn@mail.ru
Cand.Sci.(Econ.), ViceRector for Security and Military Training Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia

参考

  1. Abalkin L.I. The economic mechanism of a developed socialist society. M., 1973. S. 18, 21.
  2. Avakyan S.A. Local self-government in the Russian Federation: concepts and solutions of the new law // Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 11: Right. 1996. No. 2. S. 5.
  3. Venediktov A.V. State socialist property. M.-L., 1948. S. 46-47.
  4. Genkin D.M. Ownership in the USSR. M., 1961. S.17-30.
  5. Javadov G.A. The structure of socialist production relations. M., 1969. S. 29, 32.
  6. Law of the USSR dated 04/09/1990 N 1417-1 (as amended on 10/23/1990) "On the general principles of local self-government and local economy in the USSR" // Vedomosti SND USSR and USSR Armed Forces. - 1990. - N 16. - Art. 267.
  7. Ioffe O.S. The development of civil thought in the USSR: In 2 hours. Part II. L., 1978. S.3, 4.
  8. The Constitution (Basic Law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (as amended on March 14, 1990) (adopted by the USSR Supreme Council on October 7, 1977) // Bulletin of the USSR Armed Forces. - 1977. - N 41. - Art. 617.
  9. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993 with amendments approved during the all-Russian vote on July 1, 2020) // Official Internet portal of legal information http://www.pravo.gov.ru
  10. Kuzminov I.I. Essays on the theory of political economy. M., 1970. S. 102.
  11. Marx K. Forms of production, preceding the capitalist. M., 1940. S. 27.
  12. Morozova L.A. State and property (problems of intersectoral left institute) // State and law. 1996. No. 12. S. 20.24.
  13. Moskvin D., Binshtok F. On the forms of ownership of the means of production // Questions of Economics. 1995. No. 12. S. 68.
  14. Mozolin V.P. The right of state public property in the conditions of improving socialism // Soviet state and law. 1988. No. 5. S. 42.
  15. Ostrom V. The meaning of American federalism. What is a self-governing society / Per. from English. M., 1993. S. 164, 165, 170.
  16. Pokrytaya A.K. Production Relations and Economic Laws of Socialism (Essays on the Method of Analysis and Theory). M., 1971. S. 18.
  17. Savate R. Theory of obligations. Legal and economic essay / Per. from French M., 1972. S. 201, 206-213.
  18. Sukhanov E.A. Lectures on the right of ownership. M., 1991. S. 61.80.
  19. Theoretical problems of economic law / Ed. V.V. Laptev. M., 1975. Ch. one.
  20. Tolstoy Yu.K. Content and civil law protection of property rights in the USSR. L., 1955. S. 15-24.
  21. Federal Law of October 6, 2003 N 131-FZ (as amended on December 30, 2021) "On the general principles of organizing local self-government in the Russian Federation" // Official Internet portal of legal information http://pravo.gov.ru
  22. Cherkovets V.N. On the methodological principles of political economy as a scientific system. M., 1965. S. 120.
  23. Yakushev V.S. The legal identity of the state production enterprise. Sverdlovsk, 1973, S. 53.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
##common.cookie##