ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INSULIN DEGLUDEC IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS IN REAL-LIFE CLINICAL PRACTICE


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Despite the optimal drug provision for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) in the Sverdlovsk Region with human insulin analogues, selfmonitoring tools and insulin pumps, the problem of achieving and maintaining compensation for carbohydrate metabolism still remains. The emergence of the innovative insulin analogue Degludec (Deg) in clinical practice offers prospects for improving DM1 compensation. Purpose of the study: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of Deg in DM1 children in real-life clinical practice. Methods. In 12 DM1 children (mean age 14 [12.5-15] years, mean duration of DM1 3 [2-3.5] years) who did not achieve optimal glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin - HbA1c> 7.5%) on the previous basal bolus therapy with insulin analogues or with a high mean daily amplitude of plasma glucose level (DAPG >7 mmol/L) and/or hypoglycemia ≥1 times per week). The dynamics of HbA1c levels, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, plasma glucose levels before sleep, DAPG, as well as changes in the average daily dose of insulin, the average frequency of all episodes of hypoglycemia, night hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia (per 1 week), the number of children experiencing hypoglycemia, and the proportion of children who achieved HbA1c <7.5% after transferring to Deg were analyzed. The efficacy and safety of therapy was assessed in 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 52 weeks. Results. By the end of the follow-up period, a significant decrease in HbA1c by 1.59%, and an increase of 66% in the proportion of children reaching HbAn <7.5% was observed. A significant decrease in the FPG level from 8.7 to 6.5 mmol/l, a significant decrease in DAPG by 4 mmol/l, a significant reduction in the incidence of diurnal hypoglycemia by 88% with the disappearance of episodes of night hypoglycemia, as well as a statistically significant reduction in the dose of basal insulin by 14 % were revealed. During the whole period of observation, there were no one episode of severe hypoglycemia, ketosis, and other side effects. Conclusion. In real-life clinical practice, switching to Deg from other basal insulin analogues in children with DM1 helps to achieve the most effective glycemic control with an optimal safety profile against a background of a reduction in the dose of basal insulin; this allows to recommend Deg for a wider use in clinical practice for the treatment of DM1 in children.

Негізгі сөздер

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

A. Kiyaev

Ural State Medical University of RMH

Email: thyroend@mail.ru
MD, Department of polyclinic Pediatrics and Pediatrics of the faculty of advanced training and professional retraining Ekaterinburg, Russia

O. Kondrashova

Ural State Medical University of RMH

Ekaterinburg, Russia

L. Chernykh

Regional Children's Clinical Hospital № 1

Ekaterinburg, Russia

O. Pollyak

Regional Children's Clinical Hospital № 1

Ekaterinburg, Russia

A. Yusupova

Regional Children's Clinical Hospital № 1

Ekaterinburg, Russia

M. Slovak

City Clinical Hospital № 40

Ekaterinburg, Russia

I. Zaykova

Ural State Medical University of RMH

Ekaterinburg, Russia

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th edition/ http://www. diabetesatlas.org/
  2. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial / Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2002;287:2563-69.
  3. Clarke W., Jones T., Rewers A., Dunger D., Klingensmith G.J. Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr. Diabet. 2009;10(Suppl.12):134-45.
  4. Heise T., Hermanski L., Nosek L., Feldman A., Rasmussen S., Haahr H. Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady-state conditions in type 1 diabetes. Diabet. Obe. Metab. 2012;14(9):859-64.
  5. Biester T, Blaesig S., Remus K., Aschemeier B., Kordonouri O., Granhall C., Sondergaard F., Kristensen N.R., Haahr H., Danne T. Insulin degludec's ultra-long pharmacokinetic properties observed in adults are retained in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr. Diabetes. 2014;15:27-33.
  6. Heller S., Buse J., Fisher M., et al. Insulin degludec, an ultra-long acting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 1): a phase 3, randomised, openlabel, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1489-97.
  7. Thalange N., Deebb L., Iotova V., Kawamura T., Klingensmithe G., Philotheou A., Silverstein J., Tumini S., Ocampo Francisco A.M., Kinduryte O., Danne T. Insulin degludec in combination with bolus insulin aspart is safe and effective in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr. Diabet. 2015;16(3):164-76.
  8. Касаткина Э.П. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков. М., 1990, 240 с.
  9. IDF Global IDF/ISPAD guideline for diabetes in childhood and adolescence. Pediatr. Diabet. 2014. Available at: http://www.idf.org/ guideline-diabetes-childhood.
  10. Ratner R.E., Gough S.C., Mathieu C., et al. Hypoglycaemia risk with insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in type 2 and type 1 diabetes: a pre-planned meta-analysis of phase 3 trials. Diabet. Obes. Metab. 2013;15(2):175-84.
  11. Lane W., Bailey T.S., Gerety G., Gumprecht J., Philis-Tsimikas A., et al. Effect of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 on Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes: The SWITCH 1 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318(1):33-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7115.
  12. Wysham C., Bhargava A., Chaykin L., de la Rosa R., Handelsman Y., et al. Effect of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 on Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SWITCH 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318(1):45-56. Doi:10.1001/ jama.2017.7117.
  13. Meneghini L., Atkin S.L., Gough S.C., et al. The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given in variable oncedaily dosing intervals compared with insulin glargine and insulin degludec dosed at the same time daily. A 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabet. Care. 2013;36:858-64.
  14. Mathieu C., Hollander P., Miranda-Palma B., et al. Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec in a flexible dosing regimen vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes (BEGIN: Flex T1): a 26-week randomized, treat-to-target trial with a 26-week extension. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013:98:1154-62.
  15. Biester T., Blaesig S., Remus K., Aschemeier B., Kordonouri O., et al. Insulin degludec's ultra-long pharmacokinetic properties observed in adults are retained in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr. Diabet. 2014:15:27 33. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12116.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>