Reconstructive plastic surgery of the breast using autogenous tissue. Historical aspects

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Reconstructive plastic surgery takes a leading place in the rehabilitation of patients with breast cancer (BC) and is currently considered as the main criterion for influencing the quality of life. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the complex and combined treatment of breast cancer, where surgical treatment is still the main stage. This article presents a literature review that covers the development of reconstruction in general and describes the method of reconstruction with autologous flaps with its advantages and disadvantages in more detail. The choice of a method of one-stage reconstruction in patients with breast cancer is individual and depends on the anatomical characteristics of the patient, the histological, immunohistochemical status of the tumor, the somatic condition and age of the patients, planning for radiation therapy in the postoperative period, as well as on the preferences of the surgeon and the patient herself.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sh. G. Khakimova

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9491-0413

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Pediatric Surgery and Course of Oncology, Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Uzbekistan, Tashkent; Moscow

A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev

Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7141-2502
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow, Russia

A. D. Kaprin

Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

G. G. Khakimova

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute; Tashkent city Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and Radiology

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4970-5429
Uzbekistan, Tashkent; Tashkent

I. M. Onofriychuk

Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1742-3205
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

E. A. Rasskazova

Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. S. Sukhotko

Botkin City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2337-5919
Russian Federation, Moscow

M. Yu. Vlasova

Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. R. Bosieva

Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

V. K. Tokaev

Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center

Email: pharmateca@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Cемиглазов В.Ф., Криворотько П.В. и др. Рекомендации для врачей по ведению пациентов с РМЖ. 2017. [Semiglazov V.F., Krivorotko P.V. and others. Recommendations for doctors on the management of patients with breast cancer. 2017. (In Russ.)].
  2. Garcıa Arroyo J.M., Domınguez Lopez M.L. Psychological Problems Derived from Mastectomy: A Qualitative Study. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011:2011:132461. doi: 10.1155/2011/132461.
  3. Heimes A.-S., Stewen K., et al. Psychosocial Aspects of Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction. Breast Care. 2017;12(6):374–77. doi: 10.1159/000485234.
  4. Боровиков, А.М. Восстановление груди после мастэктомии. М., 2000. 287 с. [Borovikov, A.M. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy. M., 2000. 287 p. (In Russ.)].
  5. Nahabedian M.Y. Innovations and advancements with prosthetic breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2018;24(4):586–591.
  6. Moiel D., Thompson J., et al. Mastectomy or Breast-Conserving Therapy: Which Factors Influence A Patient’s Decision? Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-049.
  7. Зикиряходжаев А.Д., Ермощенкова М.В. и др. Опыт применения силиконовых имплантатов Mentor при реконструкции молочной железы по поводу рака в 2015 г. Поволжский онкологический вестник. 2015:38:40. [Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Ermoshchenkova M.V. and others. Experience with the use of Mentor silicone implants in breast reconstruction for cancer in 2015. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Ermoshchenkova M.V. et al. Experience with the use of Mentor silicone implants in breast reconstruction for cancer in 2015. Povolzhsky Oncological Bulletin. 2015:38:40. (In Russ.)].
  8. Hillard C., Fowler J.D., Barta R., et al. Silicone breast implant rupture: a review. Gland Surg. 2017;6(2):163–68.
  9. Kowalczyk R., Nowosielski K., et al. Factors Affecting Sexual Function and Body Image of Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors in Poland: A Short-Term Observation. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19(1):30–9.
  10. Малыгин С.Е. Мастэктомия: рождение, эволюция и современное значение в лечении и профилактике рака молочной железы. Фундаментальная онкология и экспериментальная медицина. 2015;4(15):4–7. [Malygin S.E. Mastectomy: birth, evolution and current significance in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Fundamental’naya onkologiya i eksperimental’naya meditsina. 2015;4(15):4–7. (In Russ.)].
  11. Гольдман Ю.И., Царев О.Н. Эволюция хирургического лечения рака молочной железы. Академический журнал Западной Сибири. 2016;4(65)12:42–4. [Goldman Yu.I., Tsarev O.N. The evolution of surgical treatment of breast cancer. Fundamental’naya onkologiya i eksperimental’naya meditsina. 2016;4(65)12:42–4. (In Russ.)].
  12. Jones C., Lancaster R. Evolution of Operative Technique for Mastectomy. Surg Clin N Am. 2018;98:835–44.
  13. Tansini I. Sopra il mio processo di amputazione della mammella. Gaz Med Itali. 1906;57:141.
  14. Gerber B., Krause A., Reimer T., et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):120–27.
  15. Hartrampf C.R.Jr. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. A retrospective evaluation of 335 patients. Clin Plast Surg. 1988;15:703.
  16. Atisha D., Alderman A.K., Janiga T., et al. The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:383–88.
  17. Vyas R.M., Dickinson B.P., Fastekjian J.H., et al. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1519–26.
  18. Fujino T., Harasina T., Aoyagi F. Reconstruction for aplasia of the breast and pectoral region by microvascular transfer of a free flap from the buttock. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56:178–81.
  19. Koshima I., Moriguchi T., Soeda S., et al. Free thin paraumbilical perforator-based flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29(1):12–7.
  20. Sbitany H., Mirzabeigi M.N., Kovach S.J., et al. Strategies for recognizing and managing intraoperative venous congestion in abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:809–15.
  21. Schaverien M., Saint-Cyr M., Arbique G., Brown S.A. Arterial and venous anatomies of the deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1909–19.
  22. Holm C., Mayr M., Hofter E., Ninkovic M. Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: a clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:37–43.
  23. Chang E.I., Hammond D.C. Clinical Results on Innovation in Breast Implant Design Plast Reconstr. Surg. 2018;142(Suppl. 4): S31–8.
  24. American Cancer Society, Surveillance Research. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019. 2019 [cited 2017 05/25/2019]; Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/ annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf.
  25. Hyung-Bo Sim. Revisiting Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: Indications and Refinements. Am Soc Aesthet Plast Surg. 2018.
  26. Sigalove S., Maxwel G.P., et al. Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Rationale, Indications, and Preliminary Results. PRS Global Open. 2017;139(2):287–94.
  27. Macadam S.A., et al. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):758–71.
  28. Pusic A.L., et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2499–506.
  29. Nguyen P.D., et al. Career satisfaction and burnout in the reconstructive microsurgeon in the United States. Microsurgery. 2015;35(1):1–5.
  30. Yueh J.H., Craft R.O., Colakoglu S. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1417–24. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d12a.
  31. Hu E.S., Waljee J.F., Ubel P.A. The choice for breast cancer surgery: can women accurately predict postoperative quality of life and disease-related stigma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(9):2477–82. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1582-x.
  32. Schaverien M.V., Macmillan R.D., McCulley S.J. Is immediate autologous breast reconstruction with postoperative radiotherapy good practice?: A systematic review of the literature. J. Plast Reconstr.Aesthet.Surg. 2013;66(12):1637–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.059.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap using lower abdominal fat tissue on the superior epigastric artery

Download (110KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Abdominal free flaps are based on the superficial or deep inferior epigastric vessels

Download (57KB)
Indexing metadata

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies