The Study of the Sound Waves Transmission along the Fluid Line through the TsN-2 Electric Pump

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noise at production site or at any other place where technical equipment operates is a huge issue. It has a strong negative effect on human nervous system, reduces average lifespan and causes a number of severe diseases. That is why reduction of noise, produced by pumps, is one of the current priorities of hydraulic engineering.

AIMS: In this study, the experimental research of sound transmission through an operating pump and a non-operating pump was carried out. The aim of the research is to find out, whether the last stage of a multistage pump is the main source of hydrodynamic noise (HDN) in pressure line (or the first stage in suction line), or all stages somehow contribute to HDN.

METHODS: The experiment was carried out on the TsN-2 two-stage impeller pump. In order to generate a sinusoidal signal, an imbedded generator, a vibration test rig and a power amplifier were used. Data acquisition for measurement of HDN and vibrations was performed with use of a conditioning amplifier, a hydrophone and an accelerometer. A 4-channel spectrum analyzer served as a device for processing the studied signal. In addition, a theoretical calculation, considering some physical assumptions, was carried out in order to obtain a more general and accurate concept.

RESULTS: After completing the experiment, hydrodynamic noise levels and differences for three cases were obtained. These cases are for the switched-on pump, the switched-off pump and for the pump with the removed stage. The data obtained with hydrophones (hydrodynamic noise levels) was correlated with the data obtained with accelerometers (vibration levels). As the correlated data analysis result, the sound insolation distribution over the spectrum was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS: According to the study results, it can be concluded that the absence of one of two stages ambiguously affected on the sound-insolation properties of the pump. Moreover, no firm conclusions can be drawn about the pump operation influence on the change in its sound-insolation properties.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Boris P. Brainin

Research and Production Association of Hydraulic Machines (Gidromash)

Email: braynin@gidromash.com.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0645-5052
SPIN-code: 5897-4004

Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Deputy General Director for Development

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexey A. Veselov

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: veselov.aleksei98@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3505-5848
SPIN-code: 5777-6490

Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vladimir O. Lomakin

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Email: lomakin@bmstu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9655-5830
SPIN-code: 3467-7126

Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Konstantin G. Mikheev

Research and Production Association of Hydraulic Machines (Gidromash); Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Email: zamgdpro@gidromash.com.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3142-6755
SPIN-code: 4536-2941

Technical Director

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Alexey I. Petrov

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Email: alex_i_petrov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8048-8170
SPIN-code: 7172-0320

Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Gorin SB, Kim YaA, Lesnyak AN, et al. O sposobe eksperimental’nogo opredeleniya parametrov pere-dachi kolebanii po zhidkostnomu traktu elementov gidravlicheskikh system. Akusticheskii zhurnal. 1986;32(4):529–533. (In Russ).
  2. Isakovich MA. Obshchaya akustika. Moskva: Nauka; 1973. (In Russ).
  3. Brainin BP. Zvukootrazhayushchie svoistva tsentrobezhnogo nasosa v ekspluatatsii. In: Silovye i gidravlicheskie vzaimodeistviya v nasosakh: collection of works. Moscow; 1993. Р. 88–93. (In Russ).
  4. Bukreev YuN, Pilipenko VV, Zadontsev VA, et al. Eksperimental’noe i teoreticheskoe opredelenie vkhodnogo impedansa shnekotsentrobezhnogo nasosa. In: Kavitatsionnye avtokolebaniya v nasosnykh sistemakh: collection of articles. Vol. 2. Kiev: Naukova dumka; 1976. Р. 68–73. (In Russ).
  5. Brennen C, Acosta AJ. Theoretical, quasi-static analysis of cavitation compliance in turbopumps. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 1973;10(3):175–180. doi: 10.2514/3.27748
  6. Wood GM, Murphy JS, Farquhar J. An experimental study of cavitation in a mixed flow pump impeller. Journal of Basic Engineering. 1960;82(4):929–940. doi: 10.1115/1.3662806
  7. Zhang Y, Ji K, He T, et al. Shuili Fadian Xuebao / Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering. 2021;40(11):59–71.
  8. Cao R, Yuan J, Deng F, et al. Numerical method to predict vibration characteristics induced by cavitation in centrifugal pumps. Measurement Science and Technology. 2021;32(11). doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac1181
  9. Bishtawi BA, Scribano G, Tran MV. Numerical study of blade roughness effect on cavitation in centrifugal pumps. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;2051(1):012047. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2051/1/012047
  10. Ye T, Si Q, Shen C, et al. Monitoring of primary cavitation of centrifugal pump based on support vector machine. Paiguan Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao / Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering. 2021;39(9):884–889.
  11. Guo X, Yang S, Li X, et al. The tip clearance cavitation mechanism of a high-speed centrifugal pump with a splitter-bladed inducer. Processes. 2021;9(9):1576. doi: 10.3390/pr9091576
  12. Jiang F, Li H, Liu X, Fu J. Transient cavitation characteristics of compound centrifugal impeller. In: 12th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE). Athens, Greece, 16–19 July. 2021. Р. 245–250.
  13. Aksenova E, Lomakin V, Cheremushkin V. Experimental study of cavitation resistance of restoring coatings. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;779(1):012045. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/779/1/012045
  14. Lomakin V, Bibik O. Numerical prediction of the gas content effect on the cavitation characteristics of the pump using the simplified Rayleigh-Plesset equation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019;492(1):012037. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/492/1/012037
  15. Lomakin VO, Kuleshova MS, Kraeva EA. Fluid flow in the throttle channel in the presence of cavitation. Procedia Engineering. 2015;106:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.005
  16. Trulev A, Kayuda M, Timushev S, et al. Conceptual features for improving the flow part of the multiphase stages of ESP submersible plants for small and medium feeds for extracting stratal liquid with a high free gas content. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;779(1):012042. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/779/1/012042
  17. Gradilenko N, Lomakin V. Overview of methods for optimizing the flow of the centrifugal pump. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;963(1):012016. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/963/1/012016
  18. Trulev A, Timushev S, Lomakin V. Conceptual features of improving the flow-through parts of gas separators of submersible electric pumps systems f for the production of formation fluid in order to improve the separating properties, energy efficiency and reliability. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;779(1):012036. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/779/1/012036
  19. Yan Z, Gu J, Zhao J. Experimental study on hydraulic performance optimization of pump house with ultra-short forebay. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;2044(1):012020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2044/1/012020
  20. Fu J, Jiang Y, Li H, et al. Optimization design of sliding bearing of fuel pump based on CFD method. In: 12th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE). Athens, Greece, 16–19 July. 2021. Р. 546–551.
  21. Zatti M, Moncecchi M, Gabba M, et al. Energy communities design optimization in the Italian framework. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(11). doi: 10.3390/app11115218
  22. Liao WW, Wu RK, Fan YW, et al. The hydraulic design and optimization for ultra-thin centrifugal micropump. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics. 2021;42(5):1251–1256.
  23. Hieninger T, Goppelt F, Schmidt-Vollus R, et al. Energy-saving potential for centrifugal pump storage operation using optimized control schemes. Energy Efficiency. 2021;14(2):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s12053-021-09932-5
  24. Lomakin V, Valiev T, Chaburko P. Application of optimization algorithms to improve the vibroacoustic characteristics of pumps. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;779(1):012044. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/779/1/012044
  25. Lomakin VO, Chaburko PS, Kuleshova MS. Multi-criteria optimization of the flow of a centrifugal pump on energy and vibroacoustic characteristics. Procedia Engineering. 2017;176:476–482. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.347
  26. Dyson G. Impeller relate to reduce hydraulically generated vibration. In: 13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Pump Users Symposium; 2005. https://doi.org/10.21423/R1X961

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The № 6-46 test rig layout.1 – compressor; 2 – compressor valve; 3 – vacuum pump; 4 – vacuum pump valve; 5 – tank purge valve; 6 – tank; 7 – pressure vacuum meter; 8 – electric pump purge valve TsN-2; 9 – pressure gauge; 10, 11 – gate valve DN 300; 12 – water supply valve; 13 – electric pump TsN-2; 14 – valve DN 100; 15 – flow meter; 16 – vibration test rig; 17 – hydrophones.

Download (52KB)
3. Fig. 2. The № 6–46 test rig.

Download (250KB)
4. Fig. 3. The TsN-2 electric pump layout.

Download (97KB)
5. Fig. 4. Sensor mounting layout. Sensor mounting layout: 1.1 – accelerometer on the suction line; 1.2 – accelerometer on the pump housing; 1.3 – accelerometer on the discharge line; 2.1 – hydrophone in the suction line; 2.2 – hydrophone in the discharge line.

Download (154KB)
6. Fig. 5. The standard assembly. The HDN levels for combined action of the pump and the oscillator.

Download (181KB)
7. Fig. 6. The standard assembly. The comparison of ‘pressure-suction’ HDN differences for the stopped pump and for the operating pump. The oscillator operates.

Download (260KB)
8. Fig. 7. The HDN levels comparison. The pump is stopped. The oscillator operates.

Download (203KB)
9. Fig. 8. The standard assembly. The Z-axis vibration levels comparison. The pump is stopped. The oscillator operates.

Download (214KB)
10. Fig. 9. The first stage wheel is dismantled. The HDN levels for combined action of the pump and the oscillator.

Download (228KB)
11. Fig. 10. The HDN level differences comparison. The pump operates. The oscillator operates.

Download (168KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies