Mortality in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohorts and clinical registries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. The number of kidney transplants and the number of recipients living with a kidney transplant continues to grow; approaches to the management of recipients in the late period after transplantation are changing. This requires a modern assessment of trends in post-transplant mortality.

Objective. Comparative assessment of the data on mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) received at the City Clinical Hospital № 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department from 2016 to 2020 with a systematic analysis of published studies on this issue.

Material and methods. The electronic MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for eligible studies. All prospective and retrospective mortality studies with ≥ 50 KTR patients were considered eligible. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using the Freeman-Tukey transform to calculate the weighted summary proportion under the fixed and random effects model. Of the total number of 187 studies found, 7 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, incl. and ours, with a total of 13,200 KTRs.

Results. In the analysis of 5-year survival, the proportion of deaths averaged 11.2% (fixed model) and 11.07% (random model). The mortality rate recorded in the Russian registry of the CCH № 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department was lower (5.88%), however, in general, the meta-analysis data were not heterogeneous. The proportion of cardiovascular deaths in the studies analyzed was 0.87–3.3%, averaging 1.68% (fixed model), 1.91% (random model). The data were slightly heterogeneous. A greater variation was reported for the analysis of the incidence of death from sepsis or other infectious complications (0.8–6.0%), averaging 2.58% (fixed model) or 3.42% (random model). The scatter of data on the frequency of deaths from infectious complications was more heterogeneous, however, selection bias was detected in none of the cases.

Conclusion. This meta-analysis suggests that mortality in 2016–2020 among KTRs who lived for more than a year after kidney allotransplantation and were followed-up at the Moscow City Nephrological Center CCH № 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department low than in the population of the same patients for the same period of time followed-up abroad. Given the limited number of enrolled patients and follow-up period, more research among KTRs is required.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maria S. Novikova

Central State Medical Academy of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation; Endocrinological Dispensary of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Author for correspondence.
Email: citrus7474@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Therapy, Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics with a Course of Nephrology, Central State Medical Academy of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation, Nephrologist at the Endocrinological Dispensary of the Moscow Healthcare Deparment

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Larisa O. Minushkina

Central State Medical Academy of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation

Email: minushkina@mail.ru

Dr.Sci. (Med.), Professor at the Department of Therapy, Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics with a Course of Nephrology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Oleg N. Kotenko

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: olkotenko@yandex.ru

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Chief Specialist in Nephrology of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Head of the Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology, City Clinical Hospital № 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Dmitry A. Zateyshchikov

Central State Medical Academy of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation; Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology, City Clinical Hospital № 52

Email: dz@bk.ru

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Therapy, Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics with a Course of Nephrology, Central State Medical Academy of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation, Head of the Primary Vascular Department, City Clinical Hospital № 29 n.a. N.E. Bauman of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Olga I. Boeva

Central State Medical Academy of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation

Email: citrus7474@mail.ru

Dr Sci. (Med.), Professor at the Department of Therapy, Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics with a Course of Nephrology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Sona S. Allazova

Sechenov University

Email: tallisasoto@rambler.ru

PhD student at the Department of Internal, Occupational Diseases and Rheumatology, Institute of Clinical Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky

Russian Federation, Moscow

Evgeny M. Shilov

Sechenov University

Email: emshilov@mma.ru

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor at the Department of Internal, Occupational Diseases and Rheumatology, Institute of Clinical Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Chan-on Ch., Sarwal M.M. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Status and Unmet Needs in Kidney Transplantation in Southeast Asia. REVIEW article. Front. Med. Sec. Nephrol. 2017. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00084.
  2. Отчет главного внештатного специалиста трансплантолога Минздрава России С.В. Готье Об итогах работы в 2020 г. М., 2020 г. С. 8-11. https://static-.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/057/001/original/%D0%9E%D1%82%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%B7%D0%B0_2020_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%B5.pdf?1625044703. [Report of the chief freelance specialist of the transplantologist of the Ministry of Health of Russia S.V. Gauthier On the results of work in 2020, M., 2020, pp. 8-11. https://static-.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/057/001/original/%D0%9E%D1%82%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%B7%D0%B0_2020_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%B5.pdf?1625044703 (In Russ.)].
  3. Ying T., Shi B., Kelly P.J., et al. Death after Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis by Era and Time Post-Transplant. JASN. 2020;31(12):2887–99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020050566.
  4. Devine P.A., Courtney A.E., Maxwell A.P. Cardiovascular risk in renal transplant recipients. J. Nephrol. 2019;32:389–99. doi: 10.1007/s40620-018-0549-4.
  5. Каабак М.М., Пинчук А.В., Петрушина Е.В. Практическое клиническое руководство QDIGO по ведению пациентов после трансплантации почки. Трансплантология. 2015;3:79–88. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Txp-Recipient_Russian.pdf. [Kaabak M.M., Pinchuk A.V., Petrushina E.V. QDIGO practical clinical guidelines for the management of patients after kidney transplantation. Transplantology. 2015;3:79–88.
  6. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Txp-Recipient_Russian.pdf. (In Russ.)].
  7. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., et. al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. Plos Med. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
  8. Lin L. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes. PloS One. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204056.
  9. von Elm E., Altman D.G., Egger M., et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. JCE. 2008;61(4):309–414. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
  10. Pereira T.V., Patsopoulos N.A., Salanti G., et al. Critical interpretation of Cochran's Q test depends on power and prior assumptions about heterogeneity. Res. Synthes. Methods. 2010;1(2):149–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.13.
  11. Higgins J.P.T. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  12. Nik Ruzni Nik Idris. A Comparison of Methods to Detect Publication Bias for Meta-analysis of Continuous Data. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2012;12(13):1413-1417. doi: 10.3923/jas.2012.1413.1417.
  13. Merzkani M.A., Bentall A.J., Smith B.H., et al. Death With Function and Graft Failure After Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors at Baseline Suggest New Approaches to Management. Kidney Transplant. 2022;8(2):1273. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001273.
  14. Piskin T., Simsek A., Murat-Dogan S., et al. Mortality after kidney transplantation: 10-year outcomes. Cir. Cir. 2022;90(2):172–9. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.21000300.
  15. Ruppel P., Felipe C.R., Medina-Pestana J.O., et al. The influence of clinical, environmental, and socioeconomic factors on five-year patient survival after kidney transplantation. J. Bras. Nefrol. 2018;40(2):151–61. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-3865.
  16. de Oliveira M.I.G., dos Santos A.M., Filho N.S. Survival analysis and associated factors to mortality of renal transplant recipients in a University Hospital in Maranhão. Braz. J. Nephrol. 2012;34 (3). https://doi.org/10.5935/0101-2800.20120002.
  17. Van Loon Elisabet Senev, Lerut A., et al. Assessing the Complex Causes of Kidney Allograft Loss. Transplant. 2020;104(12):2557–66. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003192.
  18. Gaston R.S., Fieberg A., Helgeson E.S., et al. Late Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation: Is “Death With Function” Really Death With a Functioning Allograft? Transplant. 2020;104(7):1483–90. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002961.
  19. Wang J.H., Skeans M.A., Israni A.K. Current Status of Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Dying to Survive. ACKD. 2016;23(5):281–86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2016.07.001.
  20. Gondos A., Döhler B., Brenner H., et al. Kidney Graft Survival in Europe and the United States: strikingly Different Long-Term Outcomes. Transplant. 2013;95(2):267–74. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182708ea8.
  21. Merion R.M., Goodrich N.P., Johnson R.J., et al. Kidney transplant graft outcomes in 379 257 recipients on 3 continents. Transplant. 2018;18(8):1914–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14694.
  22. Hariharan S., Israni A.K., Danovitch G. Long-Term Survival after Kidney Transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;385:729–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2014530.
  23. Birdwell K.A., Park M. Post-Transplant Cardiovascular Disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021;16(12):1878–89. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00520121.
  24. Wyld Melanie L.R., De La Mata Nicole L., et al. Cardiac Mortality in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Population-based Cohort Study 1988–2013 in Australia and New Zealand. Transplant. 2021;105 (2):413–22. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003224.
  25. Hernández D., Muriel A., de la Nuez P.C., et al. Survival in Southern European patients waitlisted for kidney transplant after graft failure: A competing risk analysis. PloS One, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193091
  26. Zrinka S., Tomislav L., Filipec K.T., et al. Cardiovascular mortality in liver and kidney transplant recipients. A retrospective analysis from a single institution. Med. 2021;100(20):26019. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026019.
  27. Riella L.V. Understanding the causes of mortality post-transplantation - there is more than meets the eye. J. Bras. Nefrol. 2018;40(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0002-0003
  28. Flávio de Castro Rodrigues Ferreira, Cristelli M.P., Mayara I.P., et al. Infectious complications as the leading cause of death after kidney transplantation: analysis of more than 10,000 transplants from a single center. J. Nephrol. 2017;30:601–06.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1

Download (247KB)
3. Fig. 2

Download (71KB)
4. Fig. 3

Download (69KB)
5. Fig. 4

Download (91KB)
6. Fig. 5

Download (67KB)
7. Fig. 6

Download (90KB)
8. Fig. 7

Download (77KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies