Analysis of ice cuttings collected during drilling of the snow-firn layer at Vostok station

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The size and shape of the ice cuttings influence the choice of drilling regimes, as well as the design of drilling heads, augers, chip chambers, and internal drilling channels. To collect ice chips, two boreholes, VK-22 (30 m) and VK-23 (40 m), were drilled at Vostok station. Sieving was used to analyze the particle size distribution of the ice cuttings at full depth in both boreholes. The shape of the ice particles was examined microscopically at drilling depths of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 m of VK-23. The density of the snow-firn layer and the bulk density of ice cuttings were measured. The ice cuttings became finer-grained as the borehole depth increased. The prevailing fraction changes from 1.6–3 mm to 0.4–0.63 mm, the average particle diameter reduces from 1.55 mm to 0.06 mm, and the D10, D50, and D90 values decrease more than twice. The shape analysis revealed that the ice chips are dominated by equant and elongated particles, with medium shape projections described by parameters FF = 0.74 and ER = 0.67. A visual comparison of microscopic images shows that the thickness of the ice cuttings decreases as the depth of the well increases.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

D. Vasilev

Saint Petersburg Mining University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: Vasilev_da@pers.spmi.ru
Ресей, Saint Petersburg

I. Rakitin

Saint Petersburg Mining University

Email: Vasilev_da@pers.spmi.ru
Ресей, Saint Petersburg

S. Ignatev

Saint Petersburg Mining University

Email: Vasilev_da@pers.spmi.ru
Ресей, Saint Petersburg

A. Bolshunov

Saint Petersburg Mining University

Email: Vasilev_da@pers.spmi.ru
Ресей, Saint Petersburg

A. Ozhigin

Saint Petersburg Mining University

Email: Vasilev_da@pers.spmi.ru
Ресей, Saint Petersburg

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Bolshunov A.V., Vasilev D.A., Dmitriev A.N., Ignatev S.A., Kadochnikov V.G., Krikun N.S., Serbin D.V., Shadrin V.S. Results of complex experimental studies at Vostok station in Antarctica. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. Journ. of Mining Institute. 2023, 263: 724–741. EDN: WQNJET [In Russian].
  2. Ekaykin A.A., Tchikhatchev K.B., Veres A.N., Lipenkov V.Y., Tebenkova N.A., Turkeev A.V. Vertical profile of snow-firn density in the vicinity of Vostok station, Central Antarctica. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2022, 62 (4): 504–511. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2076673422040147 [In Russian].
  3. Ignatiev S.A., Vasilev D.A., Bolshunov A.V., Vasileva M.A., Ozhigin A.Y. Experimental research of ice cuttings transport by air while drilling of the snow-firn layer. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2023, 63 (1): 141–152. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2076673423010076 [In Russian].
  4. Kapustin A.V. Some peculiarities of production of meteorological measurements at antarctic station East. Сolloquium-journal. 2019, 9 (33): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.24411/2520-6990-2019-10216 [In Russian].
  5. Lipenkov V.Ya., Polyakova E.V., Duval P., Preobrazhenskaya A.V. Structural features of the Antarctic ice sheet in the area of Vostok station based on the results of petrostructural studies of the ice core. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2007, 2 (76) 68–77 [In Russian].
  6. Serbin D.V., Dmitriev A.N. Experimental research on the thermal method of drilling by melting the well in ice mass with simultaneous controlled expansion of its diameter. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. Journ. of Mining Institute. 2022, 257: 833–842. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.82 [In Russian]
  7. Veres A.N., Ekaykin A.A., Lipenkov V.Ya., Turkeev A.V., Khodzer T.V. First data on the climate variability in the vicinity of Vostok Station (central Antarctica) over the past 2000 years based on the study of a snow-firn core. Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2020, 66 (4): 482–500. https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2020-66-4-482-500 [In Russian].
  8. Blott S.J., Pye K. Particle shape: a review and new methods of characterization and classification. Sedimentology. 2007, 55 (1): 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00892.x
  9. Clarke G.K.C. A short history of scientific investigations on glaciers. Journ. of Glaciology. 1987, (33) S1, 4–24. https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000215785
  10. Dengaev A.V. Mechanical Impurities Carry-Over from Horizontal Heavy Oil Production Well. Processes. 2023, 11: 2932. https://doi.org/11.2932.10.3390/pr11102932
  11. Ekaykin A.A., Lipenkov V.Ya., Tebenkova N. Fifty years of instrumental surface mass balance observations at Vostok Station, Central Antarctica. Journ. of Glaciology. 2023: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.53
  12. Gibson C. RAM-2 Drill system development: an upgrade of the Rapid Air Movement Drill. Annals of Glaciology. 2020, 62 (84): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.72
  13. Goodge J.W., Severinghaus J.P., Johnson J., Tosi D., Bay R. Deep ice drilling, bedrock coring and dust logging with the Rapid Access Ice Drill (RAID) at Minna Bluff, Antarctica. Annals of Glaciology. 2021, 62: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2021.13
  14. Hu Zh., Talalay P.G., Zheng Zh., Cao P., Shi G., Li Y., Fan X., Ma H. Air reverse circulation at the hole bottom in ice-core drilling. Journ. of Glaciology. 2019, 65: 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.95
  15. Hong J., Fan X., Liu Y., Liu G., Liu B., Talalay P. Size distribution and shape characteristics of ice cuttings produced by an electromechanical auger drill. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2015, 119: 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.08.012
  16. Hong J., Talalay P., Sysoev M., Fan X. DEM modeling of ice cuttings transportation by electromechanical auger core drills. Annals of Glaciology. 2014, 55 (68): 65–71. https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG68A002
  17. Hou Zh., Liu Y., Meng Q., Xu H., Liang N., Yang G. Investigation of the dynamic ascent characteristics of ice core during polar core drilling. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2024, 222: 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2024.104184
  18. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13322–1:2014 Particle size analysis – Image analysis methods – Part 1: Static image analysis methods, 2nd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2014.
  19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9276–1:1998 Repre- sentation of results of particle size analysis – Part 1: Graphical representation, 2nd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1998.
  20. Kern J., Montagna G., Borges M. Techniques for determining size and shape of drill cuttings. Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas. 2022, 16 (2): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.5419/bjpg2022-0006
  21. Kyzym I., Reyes R., Rana P., Molgaard J., Butt S. Cuttings Analysis for Rotary Drilling Penetration Mechanisms and Performance Evaluation. Conference: ARMA 2015. 49th US Rock Mechanics. 2015.
  22. Litvinenko V.S. Foreword: Sixty-year Russian history of Antarctic sub-glacial lake exploration and Arctic natural resource development. Geochemistry. 2020, 80 (3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2020.125652
  23. Litvinenko V.S., Leitchenkov G.L., Vasiliev N.I. Anticipated sub-bottom geology of Lake Vostok and technological approaches considered for sampling. Geochemistry. 2020: 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2019.125556
  24. Merkus H.G. Particle Size Measurements Fundamentals, Practice, Quality. Springer, 2009.
  25. Mikhalenko V., Kutuzov S., Toropov P., Legrand M., Sokratov S., Chernyakov G., Lavrentiev I., Preunkert S, Kozachek A., Vorobiev M., Khairedinova A., Lipenkov V. Accumulation rates over the past 260 years archived in Elbrus ice core, Caucasus. Climate of the Past. 2024, 20: 237–255. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-237-2024
  26. Ren Z., Gao H., Luo W., Elser J. Bacterial communities in surface and basal ice of a glacier terminus in the headwaters of Yangtze River on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Environmental Microbiome. 2022, 17 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-022-00408-2
  27. Rodriguez J., Edeskär T., Knutsson S. Particle shape quantities and measurement techniques: a review. The electronic journal of geotechnical engineering. 2013, 18: 169–198.
  28. Talalay P.G. Removal of cuttings in deep ice electromechanical drills. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2006, 44 (2): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2004.08.005
  29. Talalay P.G. Mechanical Ice Drilling Technology. Singapore: Springer, 2016
  30. Veres A.N., Ekaykin A.A., Golobokova L.P., Khodzher T.V., Khuriganowa O.I., Turkeev A.V. A record of volcanic eruptions over the past 2,200 years from Vostok firn cores, Central East Antarctica. Front. Earth Sci. 2023, 11: 1075739. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1075739
  31. Zhang Z., Lan X., Wen G., Qingming L., Yang X. An Experimental Study on the Particle Size and Shape Distribution of Coal Drill Cuttings by Dynamic Image Analysis. Geofluids. 2021: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5588248

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Snow-firn layer density profile in Vostok station area (a); dependence of bulk density of ice cuttings on borehole depth (b); 1 – data obtained from VK-22 borehole (blue circles); 2 – data obtained from VK-23 borehole (red triangles); 3 – confidence interval ±2 SEM (blue shading); dependence of the rate of penetration on the density of the snow-firn layer (c)

Жүктеу (287KB)
3. Fig. 2. Size parameters of ice particles, obtained from VK-22 and VK-23 boreholes. Data, obtained from different depths are indicated by colors and symbols in accordance with the legend on the charts: smoothed differential curves of particle size distribution (a); cumulative curves of particle size distribution (b); dependence of the values of percentiles D10, D50, D90 and weighted average particle diameter Dw on the borehole depth (c)

Жүктеу (757KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dependence of the weighted average diameter Dw on the rate of penetration and the density of the snow-firn layer (a); dependence of the percentile D50 on the rate of penetration and the density of the snow-firn layer (b)

Жүктеу (225KB)
5. Fig. 4. Distribution of ice cuttings shape parameters values

Жүктеу (189KB)
6. Fig. 5. Types of ice cuttings shapes: equant (a); rounded (b); elongated (c); rod (d)

Жүктеу (995KB)
7. Fig. 6. 0.63–0.8 mm ice particles sampled at the different drilling depths (a); visual representation of ice cuttings dimensions approximation based on drilling depths; 1 – 5 m; 2 – 30 m (b)

Жүктеу (479KB)


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.