Perspektivy ispol'zovaniya innovatsionnykh BOS (biologicheskoy obratnoy svyazi)-tekhnologiy vreabilitatsii patsientov posle insul'ta


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In this review, we substantiate the necessity of incorporating of novel technologies into neurorehabilitaion, from scientifical
and practical positions. We describe modern rehabilitation methods involving biofeedback, aimed to upper extremity function
recovery, gait and postural control improvement.

References

  1. Stein J. Adopting new technologies in stroke rehabilitation: the influence of the US health care system. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2009; 45: 255-8.
  2. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E et al. Effect of constraint-indused movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 month after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095-104.
  3. Черникова Л.А. Роботизированные системы в нейрореабилитации. - Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. - Том 3. - № 3. - 2009. - C. 30-35.
  4. Kleim J.A., Barbay S., Cooper N.R. et al. Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2002; 77: 63-77.
  5. Kleim J.A., Barbay S., Nudo R.J. J. Neurophysiol., 1998, 80, 3321-3325.
  6. Van Mier H., Tempel L.W., Perlmutter J.S., Raichle M.E., Petersen S.E. J. Neurophysiol., 1998, 80, 2177-2199.
  7. Classen J., Liepert J., Wise S., Hallet M., Cohen L. J. Neurophysiol., 1998, 79, 1117-1123.
  8. Liepert J., Terborg C., Weller C. Exp. Brain Res., 1999, 125, 435-439.
  9. Richards L., Hanson C., Wellborn M., Sethi A. Driving motor recovery after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008; 15:397-411.
  10. Sanes J.N., Donoghue J.P. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 2000, 23, 393-415.
  11. Karni. A., Meyer G., Jezzard P., Adams M.M., Turner R., Ungerleider L.G. Nature, 1995, 377, 155-158.
  12. Nakayama H., Jorgensen H.S., Raaschou H.O., Olsen T.S. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394-398.
  13. Feys H.M., De Weerdt W.J., Selz B.E., et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke. 1998; 29: 785-792.
  14. Kwakkel G., van Peppen R., Wagenaar R.C., et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2529--2539.
  15. Byl N.N., Pitsch E.A., Abrams G.M. Functional outcomes can vary by dose: learning-based sensorimotor training for patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 494-504.
  16. Kwakkel G., Wagenaar R.C., Twisk J.W., Lankhorst G.J., Koetsier J.C. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 354: 191-196.
  17. Cox K.L., Burke V., Gorely T.J., Beilin L.J., Puddey I.B., Controlled comparison of retention and adherence in home- vs center-initiated exercise interventions in women ages 40-65 years: the S.W.E.A.T. Study (Sedentary Women Exercise Adherence Trial). Prev Med. 2003; 36: 17-29.
  18. Dobkin B.H. Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21: 3-13.
  19. Amirabdollahian F., Loureiro R., Gradwell E., Collin C., Harwin W., Johnson G. Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007; 4:4.
  20. Colombo R., Pisano F., Micera S., et al. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 50-63.
  21. Prange G.B., Jannink M.J., Groothuis-Oudshoorn C.G., Hermens H.J., Ijzerman M.J. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006; 43: 171-184.
  22. Kwakkel G., Kollen B.J., Krebs H.I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22: 111--121.
  23. Wolbrecht E.T., Chan V., Reinkensmeyer D.J., Bobrow J.E. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008; 16: 286-297.
  24. Housman S.J., Scott K.M., Reinkensmeyer D.J. A Randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009 Jun; 23(5): 505-14.
  25. Материалы II международного конгресса «Нейрореабилитация 2010», с. 108, 2010.
  26. Schleenbaker, R.E., Mainous, A.G. Electromyographic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patients: A metaanalysis // Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 74(12), 1301-1304, 1993.
  27. Moreland, J.D., Thomson, M.A. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: A research overview meta-analysis // Physical Therapy, 74(6), 534-547, 1994.
  28. Glanz, M., Klawansky, S., Stason, W., Berkey, C., Shan, N., Phan, H., et al. Biofeedback therapy in post-stroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials // Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 1995.
  29. Moreland, J., Thomson, M.A., Fuoco, A.R. Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: A meta-analisys // Archives of Physical Medical Rehablitation, 79(2), 134-140, 1998.
  30. Woodford, H., Price, C. EMG biofeedbackfor the recovery of motor function after strike // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD004585, 2006.
  31. Агаян Г.Ц. Квантовая модель системной организации целенаправленной деятельности человека. - Ереван: Айастан, 1991. - с. 143-178.
  32. Umphred D. A. Neurological Rehabilitation Elsevier Science 5th edition 2006, p. 1272.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2011 Shapovalenko T.V., Sidyakina I.V., Lyadov K.V., Ivanov V.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies