Approaches to the diffusion processes of institutional innovation outcomes
- Authors: Molokova E.L.1, Lyashenko E.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Ural State University of Economics (USUE)
- Issue: Vol 13, No 11 (2023)
- Pages: 4903-4912
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2222-534X/article/view/625146
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.13.11.119473
- ID: 625146
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription or Fee Access
Abstract
The article is devoted to clarifying the theoretical and methodological contours of the study of institutional innovation as a type of deviant behavior.Currently, in the conditions of intensive transformation of public relations, the process of changing formal and informal institutions is underway. This creates conditions for the intensification of institutional innovation.At the same time, this type of behavior is often interpreted as deviant, which actualizes the study of not only the causes of deviant behavior in general, but also the factors of the emergence of institutional innovation in particular. At the same time, in retrospect, the results of institutional innovation undergo a process of diffusion. This makes it necessary to study not only the process of institutional innovation, but also the perception of its results by society.This article describes the factors of creating a model of deviant behavior of the type of institutional innovator, as well as the diffusion processes of institutional innovation outcomes.The results obtained in the article may be of interest to the scientific and academic community of higher education interested in studying institutional innovation in the context of its interpretation as deviant behavior.
About the authors
Elena Leonidovna Molokova
The Ural State University of Economics (USUE)
Email: elmo.sm@mail.ru
Elena Aleksandrovna Lyashenko
The Ural State University of Economics (USUE)
Email: eallko@yandex.ru
References
- Барбашин М.Ю. Теория институционального распада: концептуальный потенциал и методологические рамки // Journal of Institutional Studies. – 2016. – № 1. – c. 36-53. – doi: 10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.1.036-053.
- Полтерович В.М. Институциональные ловушки: есть ли выход? // Общественные науки и современность. – 2004. – № 3. – c. 5-16.
- Рождественская И.А., Тамбовцев В/Л. Импорт институтов и диффузия идей // Журнал экономической теории. – 2019. – № 3. – c. 468-479. – doi: 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.14.
- Сухарев О.C/ Экономическая теория институциональных изменений: подходы к моделированию коррекции и дисфункции институтов // Журнал экономической теории. – 2018. – № 2. – c. 276-290.
- Тамбовцев В.Л. Институциональные изменения: к проблеме микрооснований теории // Общественные науки и современность. – 2012. – № 5. – c. 140-150.
- Тамбовцев В.Л. Институциональный рынок как механизм институциональных изменений // Общественные науки и современность. – 2001. – № 5. – c. 25-38.
- Тамбовцев В.Л. Теоретические вопросы институционального проектирования // Вопросы экономики. – 1997. – № 3. – c. 82-94.
- Устюжанина Е.В., Евсюков С.Г. Качество институционального пространства и факторы его формирования // От рецессии к стабилизации и экономическому росту: Материалы VIII Международной научно-практической конференции. М., 2016. – c. 40-50.
- Фролов Д.П. Институциональная логика технологического прогресса (случай нанотехнологий) // Journal of Institutional Studies. – 2012. – № 1. – c. 49-64.
- Archer M.S. Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism // Sociological Theory. – 2010. – № 3. – p. 272-303. – doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x.
- Battilana J., Leca B., Boxenbaum E. How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship // Academy of management annals. – 2009. – № 1. – p. 65-107. – doi: 10.1080/19416520903053598.
- DiMaggio P.J. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory, In Institutional Patterns and Organizations. - Cambridge (Mass.), 1988. – 3-32 p.
- Dorado S. Institutional Entrepreneurship, Partaking, and Convening // Organization Studies. – 2005. – № 3. – p. 385-414. – doi: 10.1177/0170840605050873 Parse.
- Jedwab R. C., Johnson N.D., Koyama M. The Economic Impact of the Black Death // CEPR Discussion Papers. - 2020. - No. 15132
- Lounsbury M., Crumley E.T. New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation // Organization Studies. – 2007. – № 7. – p. 993-1012. – doi: 10.1177/0170840607078111.
- Merton Robert K. Social Theory and Social Structure. / Rev. enl. ed. - Glencoe, III.: Free Press, 1957. – 359-368 p.
- North D.C., Thomas R.P. An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World // Economic History Review. – 1970. – № 1. – p. 1-17.
- Pagano U. Property Rights, Asset Specificity and the Division of Labor under Alternative Capitalist Relations // Cambridge Journal of Economics. – 1991. – № 3. – p. 315.
Supplementary files
