Subtle criteria of actors' choice in favor of foreign economic activity

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The impact of global challenges is in the focus of trade and economic cooperation of interacting actors for the development of joint strategies, priority areas and programs for the spatial development for the long term. At the present stage, most of the cross-border areas face problems of cross-border relations and difficulties in choosing the further development of foreign economic activity. The authors summarize the prerequisites and a brief history of the study of export predictors (subtle criteria) that influence the decision-making of the choice in favor of foreign economic activity. The list of blocks and the content of export predictors (subtle criteria) based on the pyramid of company goal-setting focused on the foreign market and mechanisms for converting the cross-border position into a competitive advantage in the changing paradigm of development of Russia's cross-border regions are determined. Based on sociological surveys on the impact of global challenges on the development of foreign economic activity of exporters and importers, constraining factors and new opportunities for trade and economic cooperation, options for behavior strategies of subjects when making decisions on cross-border labor migration and business cooperation are identified.Funding: The reported study was funded by RFBR and FRLC, project number 21-510-23002.

Sobre autores

Galina Khmeleva

Samara State University of Economics

Email: galina.a.khmeleva@yandex.ru

Marina Kurnikova

Samara State University of Economics

Email: mvkurnikova@gmail.com

Ekaterina Chirkunova

Samara State University of Economics

Email: ekchirkunova@gmail.com

Bibliografia

  1. Barron A., Hultén P., Vanyushyn V. The role of political intelligence in firms’ export decisions during the Euro crisis // Journal of Small Business Management. – 2016. – № 4. – p. 1126-1146. – doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12238.
  2. Bernard A. B. The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade // Annu. Rev. Econ. – 2012. – № 1. – p. 283-313. – doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110928.
  3. Bernard A. B., Jensen J. B. Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? // Journal of International Economics. – 1999. – № 1. – p. 1-25. – doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00027-0.
  4. Bernard A. B., Jensen J. B., Lawrence R. Z. Exporters, jobs, and wages in US manufacturing: 1976-1987 // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. – 1995. – № 67-119. – doi: org/10.2307/2534772.
  5. Bobojonov I. Farmers’ export market participation decisions in transition economies: a comparative study between Armenia and Uzbekistan // Development. – 2016. – № 1. – p. 25-35. – doi: 10.1080/21665095.2016.1262272.
  6. Boso N. Firm innovativeness and export performance: Environmental, networking, and structural contingencies // Journal of International Marketing. – 2013. – № 4. – p. 62-87. – doi: 10.1509/jim.13.0052.
  7. Brakman S. Firm heterogeneity and exports in the Netherlands: Identifying export potential beyond firm productivity // The Journal of International Trade Economic Development. – 2020. – № 1. – p. 36-68. – doi: 10.1080/09638199.2019.1631876.
  8. Cassetta E. The relationship between digital technologies and internationalisation. Evidence from Italian SMEs // Industry and Innovation. – 2020. – № 4. – p. 311-339. – doi: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1696182.
  9. Chadee D. D., Zhang B. Y. The impact of Guanxi on export performance: A study of New Zealand firms exporting to China // Journal of Global Marketing. – 2000. – № 1-2. – p. 129-149. – doi: 10.1300/J042v14n01_07.
  10. Dosoglu-Guner B. An exploratory study of the export intention of firms: The relevance of organizational culture // Journal of Global Marketing. – 1999. – № 4. – p. 45-63. – doi: 10.1300/J042v12n04_04.
  11. Jesús A. Muñoz-Sepúlveda Diego Rodríguez (2015) Geographical and industrial spillovers in entry decisions across export markets // Applied Economics. – 2015. – № 39. – p. 4168-4183. – doi: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1026582.
  12. Lederman D., Olarreaga M., Zavala L. Export promotion and firm entry into and survival in export markets // Canadian Journal of Development Studies. – 2016. – № 2. – p. 142-158. – doi: 10.1080/02255189.2016.1131671.
  13. Melitz M. The impact of trade on aggregate industry productivity and intra-industry reallocations // Econometrica. – 2003. – № 6. – p. 1695-1725. – doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.
  14. Moraes Silva D. R. D., Lucas L. O., Vonortas N. S. Internal barriers to innovation and university-industry cooperation among technology-based SMEs in Brazil // Industry and Innovation. – 2020. – № 3. – p. 235-263. – doi: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1696182.
  15. Muñoz-Sepúlveda J. A., Rodriguez D. Geographical and industrial spillovers in entry decisions across export markets // Applied Economics. – 2015. – № 39. – p. 4168-4183. – doi: 10.1080/03050628808434708.
  16. Oliveira J. S. How many eggs in how many baskets? National versus regional diversification strategies and export success // Journal of Strategic Marketing. – 2023. – p. 1-15. – doi: 10.1080/0965254X.2023.2182448.
  17. Peluffo A., Martinez-Zarzoso I., Silva E. New stuff or better ways: what matters to access international markets? // Journal of Applied Economics. – 2020. – № 1. – p. 656-678. – doi: 10.1080/15140326.2020.1816120.
  18. Sanjian G. S. Arms export decision‐making: A fuzzy control model // International Interactions. – 1988. – № 3. – p. 243-265. – doi: 10.1080/03050628808434708.
  19. Szanto R. Intuitive decision-making and firm performance // Journal of Decision Systems. – 2022. – № 1. – p. 50-59. – doi: 10.1080/12460125.2022.2080796.
  20. Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence // Academy of Management Review. – 1989. – № 3. – p. 423-444. – doi: 10.2307/258177.
  21. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, financing: WHO report 2008. – World Health Organization, 2008. – Т. 393
  22. Банникова Н.В., Воробьева Н.В., Пупынина Е.Г. Российский экспорт подсолнечного масла: тенденции и факторы развития // Аграрный вестник Урала. – 2022. – № 1(216). – c. 76-85. – doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2022-216-01-76-85.
  23. Восс У. Грегори Трансграничные потоки данных, общий регламент защиты персональных данных и управление данными // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. – 2022. – № 1.
  24. Ушкалова Д. И., Никитина С.А. Влияние внешних факторов на экспорт и импорт России // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. – 2019. – № 6. – c. 110-122. – doi: 10.24411/2073-6487-2019-10074.
  25. Хмелева Г.А., Курникова М.В., Лебедева Л.Г. Оценка «здоровья» экспортеров-импортеров, эффективности мер поддержки в 2022 году (Самарская область): препринт. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50371417 (дата обращения: 01.06.2023).
  26. Яровая А. О., Досавицкий П. А., Мирошникова М. А. Анализ факторов, влияющих на экспорт транспортных услуг международных автомобильных перевозчиков и пути повышения их эффективности // Ресурсам области-эффективное использование. 2018. – c. 398-409.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Khmeleva G.A., Kurnikova M.V., Chirkunova E.K., 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies