On the question of the order of release from custody of persons sentenced to imprisonment


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Issues related to the transparency and conciseness of the interpretation of provisions of legislation of the Russian Federation do not cease to be relevant, as in the practice of applying these provisions various questions of interpretation and implementation still arise. This article discusses the issue of the release from custody of persons sentenced to imprisonment in various situations. The need for this consideration is due to the lack of direct action provisions in legislation that provides for an accurate and unambiguous solution to issues related to the need to release prisoners sentenced to imprisonment, the term of punishment of which has been set by the court of first instance expired before the sentence comes into force. The purpose of the article is to describe possible situations and to propose solutions in the frame of ambiguity of interpretation. This study gives an idea of the possible practical situations that arise for various reasons (due to inaccuracy of sentencing, omission in the decision on the pre-trial restriction and other incidents). The work analyzes in detail the provisions governing the indicated issue and defines an exhaustive list of entities authorized, if there are appropriate grounds, to decide on the release of these persons, peculiarities and means of resolving problematic issues. One of the most important situations is when the term of detention expires before the sentence comes into force, and the court of first instance when pronouncing the sentence in violation of the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, did not specify that the pre-trial restriction before the sentence takes effect remains the same, thereby not resolving the issue of release of a convicted person. The authors specify the necessary algorithm of actions in such practical situations. In conclusion , the article indicates the misregulating of some issues related to the release from custody of persons sentenced to imprisonment, including due to possible unintentional cases of entities whose competence includes issues about the extension or change of the pre-trial restriction and it is proposed to introduce clarifying provisions into the legislation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Valeriy B. Pervozvansky

Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

Email: pervabor@yandex.ru
Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor; leading research Moscow, Russian Federation

Yuriy N. Strogovich

Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

Email: ustrogovich@yandex.ru
leading research Moscow, Russian Federation

Elena A. Drozdova

Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

Email: Gorbunovala@ya.ru
Candidate of Law; leading researcher Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Первозванский В.Б., Строгович Ю.Н. Правовое регулирование освобождения из-под стражи осужденных к лишению свободы, у которых срок наказания истек до вступления приговора в законную силу // Уголовно-исполнительная система: право, экономика, управление. 2019. № 3. С. 33-35.
  2. Федосеев К.В. О некоторых уголовно-правовых и криминологических аспектах превышения должностных полномочий сотрудниками уголовно-исполнительной системы // Вестник Пермского института ФСИН России. 2019. № 1 (32). С. 58-62.
  3. Лосева С.Н., Гнедова Н.П. Защита прокурором права на жизнь и здоровье лиц, отбывающих наказание в виде лишения свободы // Социально-политические науки. 2018. С. 244-246.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies