Analysis and evaluation of the legal regulation, de lege lata, concerning the imposition of a custodial sentence in the Slovak Republic
- Authors: Simona F.1
-
Affiliations:
- Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice
- Issue: Vol 10, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 95-114
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2223-0092/article/view/538041
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-3-95-114
- ID: 538041
Cite item
Abstract
In the article, the author dealt with imprisonment as a type of criminal sanction. He pointed out the fact that the said punishment has the status of ultima ratio in the system of punishments in the Slovak Republic and at the same time that this punishment can be considered a universal type of punishment, as it can be imposed for any criminal offense. The author characterized the basic principles of sentencing in general, the substantive conditions of imprisonment contained in the Criminal Code, the various forms of serving this sentence and also pointed out the application problems related to imprisonment, as well as institutes of punishment related to imprisonment. In particular, he addressed aspects that modify custodial sentences, including the issue of concurrence and recidivism. She also characterized the position of imprisonment as an ultima ratio in the context of imposing alternative sentences. To this end, it analyzed the relationship between imprisonment and selected alternative sentences, as well as relevant statistics. She pointed out how imprisonment determines the imposition and specific sentences of house arrest as an alternative sentence. She concluded by considering how the existence of private prisons, which are the place where a custodial sentence is served, could affect the extent to which it is imposed by the courts. In relation to the individual partial issues addressed, he also formulated de lege ferenda proposals.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
Ferenčíková Simona
Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice
Email: simona.ferencikova@upjs.sk
Faculty of Law, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice. Košice, Slovakia
References
- Biedermanová E. Je výkon trestu odnětí svobody v nestátních objektech v českých podmínkách reálný? Trestněprávní revue. 2014. No. 5. P. 121.
- Burda E., Čentéš J., Kolesár J., Záhora J. et al. Trestný zákon: Všeobecná časť. Komentár. I. diel. first ed., C.H. Beck Praha, 2010.
- Fábry A. Väznenie. História a súčasnosť. Aleš Čeněk. Plzeň, 2012.
- Ivor J. et al., Trestné právo hmotné. Všeobecná časť. IURA EDITION, Bratislava, 2006.
- Ivor J., Polák P., Záhora J. Trestné právo hmotné. Všeobecná časť 1. IURA EDITION, Bratislava, 2017.
- Kolesár J. Sankcie v trestnom práve. Citicom, Prievidza, 2010.
- Mencerová I., Tobiášová L., Turayová Y. et al., Trestné právo hmotné. Všeobecná časť, Heuréka, Šamorín, 2015.
- Mencerová I., Tobiášová L., Turayová Y. et al., Trestné právo hmotné. Všeobecná časť, Heuréka, Šamorín, 2013.
- Michaľov L., Ferenčíková S. Penologické aspekty. In: Romža S. et al. Alternatívne spôsoby výkonu trestov. Šafárik Press UPJŠ v Košiciach, Košice, 2018. Pp. 129-137.
- Samaš O., Stiffel H., Toman P. Trestný zákon. Stručný komentár. IURA EDITION, Bratislava, 2006.
- Šramel B. Privatizácia väzenského systému: áno alebo nie? Trestněprávní revue. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 26-33.
- Štrkolec M. Väzenstvo Slovenskej republiky - vybrané problémy súčasnosti a perspektívy do budúcnosti. In: Trestná politika štátu história, súčasnosť a perspektívy. Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach, Košice, 2015. Pp. 303-318.
- Tóthová V., Ferenčíková S., Innovation in Criminal Policy of Imposing Alterantive Sanctions in Slovak Republic, in: Innovations in Science and Education. CBU Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic, 2019. Pp. 661-670.
- Treščáková D., Michaľov L. Ethical aspects and protection of personal data in the execution of the home prison penalty. Vestnik Univerziteta imeni O.E. Kutafina. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 117-129.
Supplementary files
