The conceptual apparatus of modern political science and the problems of the new world order

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Five aspects of morphological classification are proposed, which should be the basis for ideas about the formation of the conceptual apparatus of a political scientist (politician). First of all, the aspect of classification is of interest: the peculiarities of the elaboration of the semantic content of the conceptual apparatus used. The following variants are highlighted and briefly described: a pure traditional conceptual apparatus, a mobile traditional conceptual apparatus, an updated traditional conceptual apparatus, a predictively formed conceptual apparatus. It is shown that the rejection of concepts such as “savagery, barbarism” regarding the names of historical epochs of human development creates prerequisites for the transition from traditional political science to civilizational political science (neopolitology). It is concluded that political activity has appeared since the beginning of the formation of intellectual systems and the formation of the intellectual sphere. The authors formulate approaches to the semantic definition of the conceptual apparatus of a specialist engaged in intellectual activity of a political nature, and propose the following options: stage-based, associative, reductionist, systemological, general-stop.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maria A. Bulavina

Zhirinovsky University of World Civilizations

Author for correspondence.
Email: m.a.bulavina@uwc-i.ru
SPIN-code: 2292-4709

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, vice-rector for scientific work

Russian Federation, Moscow

Nikolay A. Chichulin

Zhirinovsky University of World Civilizations

Email: nikolay.chichulin@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 1798-9099

Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Professor, leading researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Borisenkov A.A. Political life: Features of conceptual analysis: monograph. Moscow: Express Polygraph Service, 2005. 179 p.
  2. Bulavina M.A., Novoselsky S.O. Prospects for Russia’s military security in the current geopolitical conjuncture. In: Interstate confrontation in the context of globalization and its impact on the management of national defense of the Russian Federation: Collection. Moscow, 2023. Pp. 105–112.
  3. Grigoryan D.K. Political competitive space and the market of political services. In: Institutional transformations of the socio-political system of Russia: Past, present, future. Proceedings of the fourth International Scientific and Practical Conference. Rostov-on-Don, 2024. Pp. 83–87.
  4. Zulyar Yu.A. Paradigm and practical significance of understanding the subject field of political science. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series: Political Science. Religious Studies. 2012. No. 2-1. Pp. 57–67. (In Rus.)
  5. Kirsanov K.A. Religious and philosophical problems of the origin and formation of mankind in the civilizational dimension. World Civilizations. 2021. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 67–90. (In Rus.)
  6. Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 21. Moscow: State Publishing House of Polit. Lit., 1961. Pp. 173–174.
  7. Mukhaev R.T. Political science: Textbook for academic bachelor’s degree. 5th ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Yurait, 2014. 700 p.
  8. Novoselsky S.O., Moiseeva O.A., Filippova O.A. Communication policy of executive authorities with the population in social networks. Questions of Political Science. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 3 (91). Pp. 1001–1013. (In Rus.)
  9. Ocheretyaniy A.A. On the question of political science as a science. Questions of Political Science. 2016. No. 1 (21). Pp. 18–30. (In Rus.)
  10. Pryadko I.P. The political system: Economic and socio-political aspects of understanding. Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2024. No. 3 (164). Pp. 221–225. (In Rus.)
  11. Tsoi L.N. The language of a political scientist: Mental conflict and the problem of understanding. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge. 2023. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 370–381. (In Rus.)
  12. Chernysheva A.V. Synthesis of the ethosphere and the noosphere – the era of the birth of an ethically reasonable person. The Successes of Modern Natural Science. 2004. No. 11. Pp. 108–109. (In Rus.)
  13. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations. 3rd ed. G.E.M. Anscombe (transl.). New York: Macmillan, 1968. 250 p. (Original work published 1952).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download