European Arrest Warrant Issued by Public Prosecutor’s Offices in the Light of the Case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

A set of cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union have been adopted, supplementing the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. The question repeatedly analysed in its case-law is whether the European arrest warrant can be issued by Public Prosecutor’s Offices. The contribution deals with the case-law of the Court of Justice dealing with this question. In seven sections the paper analyses relevant cases. In each case at the outset a reference for a preliminary ruling is mentioned. Further, dispute in the main proceedings and the question(s) referred for a preliminary ruling are analysed. The most important parts of analyses are considerations by the Court of Justice and its rulings.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Libor Klimek

Matej Bel University

Email: libor.klimek@umb.sk
Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Law, Criminology, Criminalistics and Forensic Disciplines; Director of the Criminology and Criminalistics Research Centre at the Faculty of Law; Visiting Professor at the Faculty of Law of the Leipzig University in Germany Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic

Bibliografia

  1. Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States as amended by the Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA. Official Journal of the European Communities. L 190/1 of 18 July 2002.
  2. Klimek L. European arrest warrant. Cham-Heidelberg-New York-Dordrecht-London: Springer, 2015. 375 p.
  3. Klimek L. Mutual recognition of judicial decisions in European Criminal Law. Cham: Springer, 2017. 742 p.
  4. Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 November 2019 - Joined Cases C-566/19 PPU and C-626/19 PPU - Parquet général du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg versus JR and Openbaar Ministerie versus YC.
  5. Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 November 2019 - Case C-625/19 PPU - Openbaar Ministerie versus XD.
  6. Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 November 2019 - Case C-627/19 PPU - Openbaar Ministerie versus ZB.
  7. Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 June 2020 - Case C-510/19 - Openbaar Ministerie, YU, ZV versus AZ.
  8. Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 April 2019 - Case C-509/18 - Minister for Justice and Equality v PF.
  9. Opinion of Advocate General Richard De La Tour delivered on 11 February 2021 - Case C-648/20 PPU - Svishtov Regional Prosecutor’s Office versus PI.
  10. Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 17 September 2019 - Case C-489/19 PPU - NJ (Public Prosecutor’s Office, Vienna) - Criminal proceedings in the presence of Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin.
  11. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel (Luxembourg) made on 25 July 2019 - JR (Case C-566/19).
  12. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium) made on 4 July 2019 - AZ (Case C-510/19).
  13. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) made on 26 June 2019 - NJ (Case C-489/19 PPU).
  14. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) made on 22 August 2019 - Openbaar Ministerie (Case C-626/19 PPU).
  15. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) made on 22 August 2019 - Openbaar Ministerie (Case C-625/19 PPU).
  16. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) made on 22 August 2019 - Openbaar Ministerie (Case C-627/19 PPU).
  17. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 6 August 2018 - Minister for Justice and Equality v PF (Case C-509/18).
  18. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Svishtov Regional Prosecutor’s Office (Bulgaria) made on 26 November 2020 - P I (Case C-648/20 PPU).

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies