Ecosystem Approach to the Study of Depolarization of Society in the Context of Digital Transformation


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The use of digital technologies to accelerate the well-being of our citizens dictates new requirements not only for the state of the technical infrastructure of the social environment in which numerous actors in the face of organizations and groups of citizens communicate with each other, but also for rethinking the processes of interaction of these actors with various social systems: political, economic, social, cultural, etc. The ecosystem approach to the provision of various products and services to society allows us to look at social processes through the prism of analogy with the functioning of natural ecosystems. In this case, it is possible to formulate an understanding of “ecosystem services” as a result of achieving a dynamic balance in the ecosystem of the efforts of the subsystem of living and inanimate nature and the socio-economic subsystem, in contrast to the approach adopted today in Russia, in which the term “ecosystem” is actually equated to the concept of “digital platform”. This approach allows us to look at the ecosystem as a community of individuals aimed at creating a special moral and ethical climate within the ecosystem, aimed at reducing social tension, improving the well-being of participants and their positive impact on the environment external to the ecosystem.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Andrei Lapin

Institute of Public Service and Management, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Email: av.lapin@igsu.ru
Cand. Sci. (Polit.), associate professor at the Department of Project and Program Management of the Faculty of State Economic Management Moscow, Russian Federation

Natalia Tsvetkova

Institute of Social and Political Research of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: tsvetoknb@gmail.com
post graduate Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Duncan O.D., Schnore L.F., Rossi P.H. Cultural, behavioral and ecological perspectives in the study of social organization // American Journal of Sociology. 1959. Vol. 65. No. 2. Pp. 132-136. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/222654 (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  2. Ehrlich P., Ehrlich A. Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species // The Quarterly Review of Biology. 1982. Vol. 57. No. 3. 305 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/412890 (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  3. Holdren J., Ehrlich P. Human population and the global environment // Am. ScientiSt. 1974. Vol. 62. Pp. 282-292. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4832978/ (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  4. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005. P. 39. URL: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.791.aspx.pdf (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  5. Tansley A.G. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms // Ecology. 1935. No. 16. Pp. 284-307.
  6. Veblen T. Why is economics not an evolutionary science // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1898. Vol. 12. Pp. 373-397.
  7. Wilson C.M., Matthews W.H. (eds.). Man’s impact on the global environment: Assessment and recommendations for action: Report of the Study of Critical Environmental Problems (SCEP). Cambridge, Mass., London: M.I.T. Press, 1970. 319 p. URL: https://www.worldcat.org/title/mans-impact-on-the-global-environment-assessment-and-recommendations-for-action-report-of-the-study-of-critical-environmental-problems-scep/oclc/111077 (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  8. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. UN General Assembly. 42 session. Item 83 of the provisional agenda A/42/150. 04.08.1987. 412 p. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  9. Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club (2021). URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66975 (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  10. Ilyicheva L.E., Kondrashov A.O., Lapin A.V. Trust as a bridge over the abyss of uncertainty between the government and society. Monitoring Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021. No. 2. P. 173. (In Rus.) URL: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1917 (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  11. Convention on Biological Diversity, adopted in Rio de Janeiro on June 5, 1992. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/biodiv.shtml (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  12. Advisory Report on Ecosystems. Bank of Russia. June, 2021. URL: https://arb.ru/site/docs/2021-06-07_OD/CBRF--Ekosistemy.pdf
  13. Parsons T. On the structure of social action. Moscow: Academic Project, 2000. 880 p.
  14. European Commission website (2021). Enviroment. Nature and biodiversity. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  15. TEEB website (2021). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. URL: http://teebweb.org/about/approach (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  16. Website of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Program (2021). URL: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/ru/Index-2.html (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  17. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 09.05.2017. No. 203 “On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030”. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41919/page/1 (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).
  18. Ecosystems: Approaches to regulation. Central Bank of the Russian Federation. April 2021. (In Rus.) URL: https://cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/119960/Consultation_Paper_02042021.pdf (data of accesses: 09.12.2021).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


##common.cookie##