TOPICAL ASPECTS OF THE LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF PARASITIC DISEASES


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To estimate the diagnostic value of laboratory diagnostic techniques for parasitoses that are relevant to southern Russia. Materials and methods. For verification of parasite infestation in 1500 patients attending the Clinic of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Rostov Research Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being, the investigators used laboratory diagnostic techniques regulated by the Methodological Guidelines (MG) 4.2.3145-13 «Laboratory diagnosis of helminthiasis and protozoan disease» and MG 3.2.1173-02 «Serological tests for laboratory diagnosis of parasitic diseases». Results. Parasitic diseases were found in 58.5% of the patients who had visited the clinic with a referral diagnosis of helminthic invasion. The most frequently recorded diseases were enterobiasis (35.5%), echinococcosis (18.7%), toxocariasis (15.5%), and taeniarhynchosis (5.8%). The most effective method for diagnosing enterobiasis was a triple examination of the material collected from the perianal folds, which could identify pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis) eggs in 91.7% of the patients. The permanent laboratory signs of toxocariasis were peripheral blood eosinophilia and a positive result of ELISA with Toxocara antigen. A one-month follow-up after etiotropic therapy showed that 65.0% of patients had a two-fold or greater increase in antibody titers with a reduction of eosinophilia and normalization of peripheral blood parameters. There were negative results of ELISA with Echinococcus antigen in 9 (42.9%) patients prior to surgery and only in 4 (19.1%) patients a month after surgery. Five patients had a high risk of recurrence due to larval dissemination during surgery. The diagnosis of taeniarhynchosis was based on the results of parasitological examination of helminth segments before and after antihelminthic therapy. Examination of the scrapped perianal material revealed taeniid eggs in 62.5% of the patients. Conclusion. One of the important factors in optimizing the diagnosis of parasitic diseases is the choice of a method and the frequency of examinations, as well as the parallel application of all direct and immunological methods for the laboratory and instrumental verification of a diagnosis.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalia V. Golovchenko

Rostov Research Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being

Email: ya.parazitov-net@yandex.ru
Doctor of Clinical-laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Larisa A. Ermakova

Rostov Research Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: ya.parazitov-net@yandex.ru
PhD, Head, Clinic of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Tatyana I. Tverdochlebova

Rostov Research Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being

Email: ya.parazitov-net@yandex.ru
МБ., №ad Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Natalia Yu. Pshenichnaya

Rostov Research Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: natalia-pshenichnaya@yandex.ru
MD; Head, Department of Infectious Diseases with Course of Childhood Infectious Diseases, Faculty for Advanced Training and Professional Retraining of Specialists; Physician, Clinic of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases 29, Nakhichevansky Lane, Rostov-on-Don 344022, Russia

Galina V. Gopatsa

Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: galentinabk@mail.ru
Cand. Med. Sci., Associate Professor, Department of Infectious Diseases with Course of Childhood Infectious Diseases, Faculty for Advanced Training and Professional Retraining of Specialists Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Andrey S. Zhuravlev

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, (Sechenov University)

Email: and0898@yandex.ru
Third-Year Student, Faculty of General Medicine Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Ермакова Л.А., Твердохлебова Т.И., Пшеничная Н.Ю. Диагностическая значимость иммуноферментного анализа при ларвальных гельминтозах (трихинеллез, эхинококкоз, токсокароз). Профилактическая и клиническая медицина 2012; (3): 59-63.
  2. Твердохлебова Т.И. Трихинеллез на юге России: эпидемиология, диагностика и профилактика в современных социально-экономических условиях. Автореф. дис..докт. мед.наук. М, 2007.
  3. Упырев А.В., Хроменкова Е.П., Димидова Л.Л., Ермакова Л.А., Хуторянина И.В., Ковтунов А.И. и др. Санитарно-паразитологический мониторинг в очагах энтеробиоза. Материалы ежегодной конференции «Теория и практика борьбы с паразитарными болезнями». М., 2014; 329-31.
  4. Хроменкова Е.П., Димидова Л.Л., Твердохлебова Т.И., Упырев А.В., Хуторянина И.В. Структура эпидемиологической значимости объектов оружающей среды в санитарной паразитологии. Здоровье населения и среда обитания 2015; (7): 46-9.
  5. Хроменкова Е.П.,Димидова Л.Л., Твердохлебова Т.И. Актуальность проведения санитарно-паразитологического мониторинга на юге России. Инфекция и иммунитет 2012; 2(1-2): 387.
  6. Пшеничная Н.Ю., Головченко Н.В., Хроменкова Е.П., Яговкин Э.А., Соловьев М.Ю. Актуальные биогельминтозы юга России. Сборник научных трудов по итогам Международной научно-практической конференции. Красноярск, 2015; 49-52.
  7. Ермакова Л.А., Твердохлебова Т.И., Болатчиев К.Х., Цекапибзева Ф.К., Киртанасов Я.П., Домашенко Н.Н. Клинические и эпидемиологические аспекты эхинококкоза на некоторых территориях Северного Кавказа. Цитокины и воспаление 2012; 11(3): 65.
  8. Ермакова Л.А. Актуальные вопросы рецидивного эхинококкоза в Ростовской области. Цитокины и воспаление 2014; 13(3): 91.
  9. Campo Polanco L., Gutierrez L.A., Cardona Arias J. Diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Meta-analysis on evaluation of conventional parasitological methods (1980-2013). Revist Espanolade Salud Publica 2014; 88(5): 581-600.
  10. Ермакова Л.А., Пшеничная Н.Ю., Амбалов Ю.М., Черникова Е.А. Оценка эффективности многократного копрологического исследования для диагностики лямблиоза. Медицинская паразитология и паразитарные болезни 2007; (4): 32-4.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies