PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERSHIPS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PHARMACEUTICALS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article examines the causes for creating alliances between manufacturers and drug developers. The attention has also been paid to the classification of such partnerships depending on the level of integration. The classification is necessary for further study of relations in the alliances. It is important to understand how economically effective and justified such partnerships are. The aim of the study is to determine the reasons for creating partnerships between drug developers and manufacturers, and to work out a classification of partnerships in the field of pharmacology. Materials and methods. The study analyzes existing alliances, partnerships of Big Pharma companies such as Bayer AG, Merck & Co, Pfizer. Results and discussion. The variety of forms of partnerships allows all participants in this market to get from cooperation the benefits they need. Some seek to reduce risk, others look forward to gaining access to new research opportunities, the third seek to share knowledge for greater productivity. However, there is always the opposite side, they have to sacrifice something to get a market advantage. For example, increased integration leads to a reduction in the risk of drug creation, but also leads to a decrease in the company’s independence. Conclusion. The results of this study can be used later in the study of the financial effectiveness of pharmaceutical partnerships, as well as in exploring the causes of alliances’ collapses. Any partnership has its value and can be considered as an intangible asset of the company. However, at the moment, there is no universal way of assessing this type of active assets, therefore, classification is a key step in creating a model for determining the value of a partnership. 

Full Text

Фармация и фармакология Т. 6 № 1, 2018Экономика и менеджмент медициныPharmacy & Pharmacology V. 6 N 1, 2018Фармация и фармакология Т. 6 № 1, 2018Экономика и менеджмент медициныPharmacy & Pharmacology V. 6 N 1, 2018
×

About the authors

A. L. Bulgakov

NRU Higher School of Economics

Email: z3900207@mail.ru

R. V. Kosmakov

Lomonosov MSU

Email: r.v.kosmakov@yandex.ru

References

  1. Hammonds T. Academic–Pharma drug discovery alliances: seeking ways to eliminate the valley of death // Future. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 14. P. 1891–1899. doi: 10.4155/fmc.15.111.
  2. Gueth A. Entering into an alliance with big pharma //Pharmaceutical Technology. 2001. Vol. 25. No. 10. P. 132–138. URL: http://di.typepad.com/opentto/free_papers/Pharmaceutical_Technology_-_October_2001.pdf (дата обращения: 10.12.2017)
  3. Hagedoorn J. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 // Research policy. 2002. Vol. 31. Is. 4. P. 477–492. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
  4. Saci F., Jasimuddin S.M. Does strategic partnership matter to create value of a firm? An empirical study based on SBF 250 French firms // Research in International Business and Finance. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.10.002
  5. Doz Y.L., Hamel G. Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Harvard Business Press, 1998.
  6. Gottinger H.W., Umali C.L. Strategic alliances in global biotech pharma industries // The Open Business Journal. 2008. Vol. 1. Is. 1. P. 10–24.
  7. Duffy R.S. Towards a better understanding of partnership attributes: An exploratory analysis of relationship type classification // Industrial Marketing Management. 2008. Vol. 37. Is. 2. P. 228–244. DOI: 10.1016/j. indmarman.2007.09.005
  8. Pun H., Ghamat S. The value of partnership under competition: When competitors may be R&D joint-venture and supply-chain partners for a critical component // International Journal of Production Economics. 2016. Vol. 177.
  9. P. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.018
  10. База данных Global Data. URL: https://www.globaldata.com/healthcare/research-areas/pharmaceutical/deals-insights/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2017)
  11. The Statistics Portal “Statista”. URL: www.statista.com (дата обращения: 10.08.2017)
  12. Goldman Sachs. Strategic alliances in biotechnology. Goldman Sachs Global Equity Research, New York: Author, 2005.
  13. Ernst & Young. Beyond Borders: The Global Biotechnology Report. Ernst & Young, 2017.
  14. Этапы разработки новых лекарственных препаратов. URL: http://valeologija.ru/lekcii/lekcii-po-omz/470-etapy-razrabotki-novyx-lekarstvennyx-preparatov (дата обращения: 10.12.2017).
  15. Brothers L. The fruits of genomics // New York: Lehman Brothers, 2001. P. 24, 83.
  16. Varian H. R. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. Ninth International Student Edition. WW Norton & Company, 2014.
  17. Рейтинг крупнейших фармацевтических компаний мира. URL: http://basetop.ru/reyting-krupneyshihfarmatsevticheskih-kompaniy-mira/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2017).
  18. Tyebjee T., Hardin J. Biotech–pharma alliances: Strategies, structures and financing // Journal of commercial biotechnology. 2004. Vol. 10. Is. 4. P. 329–339.
  19. Reuer J.J., Devarakonda R. Partner Selection in R&D Collaborations: Effects of Affiliations with Venture Capitalists // Organization Science. 2017.
  20. Партнерства компании Bayer. URL: https://pharma.bayer.com/en/innovation-partnering/partnering/selected-partnerships/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2017).
  21. Рейтинг инновационных компаний «ТехУспех». URL: http://www.ratingtechup.ru/rate/2017/2056/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2017).
  22. Сайт компании ГЕРОФАРМ. URL: http://www.geropharm.ru/partners/international_cooperation/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2017).
  23. Pfizer в России. URL: https://www.pfizer.ru/node/6531 (дата обращения: 10.12.2017).
  24. Bayer в России. URL: https://www.bayer.ru/about/history-russia/ (дата обращения: 10.12.2017).
  25. Adegbesan J.A., Higgins M.J. The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration // Strategic Management Journal. 2011. Vol. 32. Is. 2. P. 187–211.
  26. Guo D., Guo Y., Jiang K. Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China // Research policy. 2016. Vol. 45. Is. 6. P. 1129–1144.
  27. Honjo Y., Nagaoka S. Initial public offering and financing of biotechnology start-ups: Evidence from Japan. 2015. URL: http://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/rs/bitstream/10086/27491/1/070iirWP15-20.pdf (дата обращения 10.12.2017).
  28. Фролова В.Б. Стратегические ориентиры принятия решения по Initial Public Offering // Концепт. 2015. №. 10. С. 121-125.
  29. Асланов Д.И, Ларионова А.А. Международные стратегические альянсы // Символ науки. 2016. №. 2-2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strategicheskie-orientiry-prinyatiya-resheniya-po-initial-public-offering (дата обращения 10.12.2017).
  30. Сайт союза «Медико-фармацевтические проекты. XXI век». URL: http://21mpp.ru (дата обращения 10.12.2017).
  31. Сайт союза фармацевтических и биомедицинских кластеров. URL: http://farmunion.ru/ (дата обращения 10.12.2017).
  32. Hart O., Holmstrom B. A theory of firm scope // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2010. Vol. 125. Is. 2. P. 483–513.
  33. Евстратов А.В. Исследование процессов слияний и поглощений компаний на мировом фармацевтическом рынке // Вестник Самарского Государственного Экономического Университета. 2016. №3 (137). С. 32–37.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Bulgakov A.L., Kosmakov R.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 67428 от 13.10.2016. 

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies