Haller’s cells in the practice of an otorhinolaryngologist
- Authors: Lavrenova G.V.1, Oganyan K.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
- The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov
- Issue: Vol 30, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 19-26
- Section: Review
- Submitted: 06.03.2024
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2310-3825/article/view/628808
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33848/fopr628808
- ID: 628808
Cite item
Abstract
Haller’s cells are infraorbital ethmoidal cells located along the inferior wall of the orbit. They were first described by Albrecht von Haller in 1743 and were subsequently named after him. The reported prevalence of these cells varies significantly from 2.7% to 45.1%. They are a variant of the normal anatomical structure of the paranasal sinuses. These cells are often incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Haller’s cells may predispose patients to maxillary sinusitis and may complicate maxillary sinus surgery. In addition, isolated inflammation of these cells with a mucocele formation is possible. A case of cholesterol granuloma of Haller’s cell was also described in the literature. Notably, a relationship exists between the presence of infraorbital ethmoidal cells and the descending course of the infraorbital canal and the presence of dehiscence of the lower orbital wall. However, resecting these cells is at risk of orbital damage. Haller’s cells are identified using CT; on coronal sections, they appear as clearly defined round, oval, or teardrop-shaped formations with clear smooth boundaries, located medial to the infraorbital foramen. Large cells blocking the ethmoidal infundibulum and predisposing to the development of maxillary sinusitis and Haller cell inflammation require surgical treatment. In these cases, endoscopic resection is the method of choice. Rhinosurgeons should be aware of the possible risks involved in the removal of Haller’s cells and manipulations in this area. Preoperatively, CT scans must be reviewed to identify features of the paranasal sinus structure and carefully plan the surgery.
Full Text

About the authors
Galina V. Lavrenova
Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Email: lavrenovagv@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3537-0226
Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgKristina A. Oganyan
The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov
Author for correspondence.
Email: oganyan_christina@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4138-2127
MD, resident; address
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Nosulya EV, Kim IA, Maksimov VA, et al. Frequency and variants of pneumatization of intranasal structures and their association with chronic sinusitis. Russian Rhinology. 2021;29(3):155–160. EDN: FXUHIS doi: 10.17116/rosrino202129031155
- Choi JH. Hypoesthesia of midface by isolated Haller’s cell mucocele. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(4):516–519. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.06.009
- Caversaccio M, Boschung U, Mudry A. Historical review of Haller’s cells. Ann Anat. 2011;193(3):185–90. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.02.006
- Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A, et al. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(9):20130055. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130055
- Ms RR, Ms PA, Ahuja CK, et al. Infected Haller cell misdiagnosed as invasive fungal sinusitis – a parallax. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;75(Suppl 1):675–679. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03211-0
- Friedrich RE, Fraederich M, Schoen G. Frequency and volumetry of infraorbital ethmoid cells (Haller cells) on cone-beam computed tomograms (CBCT) of the mid-face. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2017;6:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/iprs000109
- Moshfeghi M, Dehini H, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and relationship with orbital floor dehiscence. Int J Dent. 2023;2023:5200152. doi: 10.1155/2023/5200152
- Ghosh D, Baruah DK, Goswmi SC, Basu SK. Lateral rhinotomy for a large, infected Haller cell causing proptosis. Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;30(1):4. doi: 10.32412/pjohns.v30i1.389
- Özcan İ, Göksel S, Çakır-Karabaş H, Ünsal G. CBCT analysis of Haller cells: relationship with accessory maxillary ostium and maxillary sinus pathologies. Oral Radiol. 2021;37(3):502–506. doi: 10.1007/s11282-020-00487-2
- Christmas DA, Mirante JP, Yanagisawa E. Endoscopic view of a Haller cell draining into the maxillary sinus. Ear Nose Throat J. 2011;90(1):E31. doi: 10.1177/014556131109000120
- Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(1 Pt 1):56–64. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199101000-00010
- Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ. The functional endoscopic approach to inflammatory sinus disease: current perspective and technique modifications. Am J Rhinol. 1988;2:89–96. doi: 10.2500/105065888781693078
- Alkire BC, Bhattacharyya N. An assessment of sinonasal anatomic variants potentially associated with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(3):631–634. doi: 10.1002/lary.20804
- Khojastepour L, Haghnegahdar A, Khosravifard N. Role of sinonasal anatomic variations in the development of maxillary sinusitis: a cone beam CT analysis. Open Dent J. 2017;11:367–374. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010367
- Sedaghat AR, Gray ST, Wilke CO, Caradonna DS. Risk factors for development of chronic rhinosinusitis in patients with allergic rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2(5):370–375. doi: 10.1002/alr.21055
- Akbulut A, Dilaver E. Correlation between prevelance of Haller cells and postoperative maxillary sinusitis after sinus lifting Procedure. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57(5):473–476. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.04.013
- Stackpole SA, Edelstein DR. The anatomic relevance of the Haller cell in sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 1997;11(3):219–223. doi: 10.2500/105065897781751910
- Ali IK, Sansare K, Karjodkar FR, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of accessory maxillary ostium and Haller cells: Prevalence and clinical significance. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47(1):33–37. doi: 10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.33
- Chmielik LP, Chmielik A. The prevalence of the Onodi cell – most suitable method of CT evaluation in its detection. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;97:202–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.001
- Kedar E, Koren I, Medlej B, Hershkovitz I. The associations between the maxillary sinus volume, infraorbital ethmoid cells, and the infraorbital canal: a CT-based study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(23):3593. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233593
- Hammad MS, Gomaa MA. Role of anatomical nasal abnormalities in rhinogenic headache. Egypt J Ear Nose Throat Allied Sci. 2012;13(1):31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejenta.2012.01.006
- Mohindra S, Dhingra S. Isolated mucocele in an infraorbital ethmoidal – Haller cell: a unique presentation. Clin Rhinol. 2013;6(3):129–130. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1147
- Lee DH, Yoon TM, Lee JK, Lim SC. Cholesterol granuloma of a Haller cell associated with unilateral exophthalmos and diplopia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(7):833–835. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.11.028
- Yesilova E, Bayrakdar IS. The appearance of the infraorbital canal and infraorbital ethmoid (Haller’s) cells on panoramic radiography of edentulous patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1293124. doi: 10.1155/2018/1293124
- Osbon SA, Butaric LN. Investigating the relationship between infraorbital canal morphology and maxillary sinus size. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2023;306(1):110–123. doi: 10.1002/ar.25007
- Haghnegahdar A, Khojastepour L, Naderi A. Evaluation of infraorbital canal in cone beam computed tomography of maxillary sinus. J Dent (Shiraz). 2018;19(1):41–47.
- Ference EH, Smith SS, Conley D, Chandra RK. Surgical anatomy and variations of the infraorbital nerve. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(6):1296–1300. doi: 10.1002/lary.25089
- Lantos JE, Pearlman AN, Gupta A, et al. Protrusion of the infraorbital nerve into the maxillary sinus on CT: prevalence, proposed grading method, and suggested clinical implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(2):349–353. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4588
- Sebrechts H, Vlaminck S, Casselman J. Orbital edema resulting from Haller’s cell pathology: 3 case reports and review of literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2000;54(1):39–43.
- Raina A, Guledgud MV, Patil K. Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller’s) cells: a panoramic radiographic study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(4):305–308. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/22999207
- Karpishchenko SA, Vereshchagina OE, Stancheva OA. The experience of endoscopic surgical treatment of isolated mucoceles of ethmoidal labyrinth. Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2015;21(2):57–59. EDN: TYJBGP
- Van Rompaey J, Bush C, Solares CA. Anatomic analysis specific for the endoscopic approach to the inferior, medial and lateral orbit. Orbit. 2014;33(2):115–123. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2013.859277
- Lund VJ, Wright A, Yiotakis J. Complications and medicolegal aspects of endoscopic sinus surgery. J R Soc Med. 1997;90(8):422–428. doi: 10.1177/014107689709000803
- Busaba NY, Salman SD. Ethmoid mucocele as a late complication of endoscopic ethmoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128(4):517–522. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59980300097-4
- Telmesani LM, Al-Shawarby M. Osteitis in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a comparative study between primary and recurrent cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(5):721–724. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1146-x
Supplementary files
