Application of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

FMEA - is a technique used to study potential failures of various products. The probability of occurrence (O), the likelihood of severity (S) and the probability of detecting defects (D) can be used as an indicator of the priority risk number (PRN). Comparison of various methods for determining the priorities of failure modes in the calculated FMEA analysis is carried out. The value of the fuzzy PRN and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is proposed for determining the weights of risk factors. A method is proposed to eliminate some of the disadvantages of the traditional approach. As a result of the study, a mathematical model and methodology were created to identify high-priority types of errors based on fuzzy FMEA - AHP.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Van Pham

MIREA - Russian Technological University

Email: anhtutula.king@gmail.com
(VietNam), postgraduate student Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Гродзенский С.Я. Управление качеством: учебник. М.: Проспект, 2019. 368 с.
  2. Bonnabry P., Cingria L., Sadeghipour F. et al. Use of a systematic risk analysis method to improve safety in the production of pediatric parenteral nutrition solutions // Qual. Saf. Heath Care. 2005. Vol. 14. Pp. 93-98.
  3. Montesi G., Lechi A. Prevention of medication errors: Detection and audit // Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Vol. 67.
  4. Patrick D. Practical reliability engineering. 4th ed. Beijing: Publish House of Electronics Industry, 2004.
  5. Karthik S., Sivakumar A., Sevvel P. Comparative study of risk assessment value against risk priority number // Int. J. Innovative Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2015. Vol. 4. No. 2. Pp. 114-123.
  6. Kiani Aslani R., Feili H.R., Javanshir H. A hybrid of fuzzy FMEA-AHP to determine factors affecting alternator failure causes // Management Science Letters. 2014. No. 4 (9). Pp. 1981-1984.
  7. Ben-Daya M., Raouf A. A revised failure mode and effects analysis model // International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 1996. No. 13 (1). Pp. 43-47.
  8. Grodzenskiy S.Ya., Chesalin A.N., Pham Van Tu. Integrate fuzzy analytic hierarchy process into failure mode and effects analysis to identify priority functions in product improvement process // International Scientific - Practical Conference “Information Innovative Technologies”, Prague, April 22-26, 2020. Pp. 119-123.
  9. Фам Ван Ты. Повышение эффективности приоритетного числа риска с помощью нечеткого метода анализа иерархии // Наука и бизнес: пути развития. 2021. № 3 (117). С. 49-52.
  10. Zadeh A. Fuzzy Sets // Information Control. 1965. No. 8. Pp. 338-353.
  11. Chang D.Y. Extent analysis and synthetic decision, optimization techniques and applications. Vol. 1. Singapore: World Scientific, 1992. 352 p.
  12. Саати Т. Принятие решений. Метод анализа иерархий. М.: Радио и связь, 1993. 278 с.
  13. Фам Ван Ты. Нечеткий метод анализа иерархий и применение для анализа видов и последствий отказов // Сб. докладов конф. «Инновационные технологии в электронике и приборостроении» ФТИ РТУ МИРЭА. М. C. 409-414.
  14. Chang D.Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP // European Journal of Operational Research. 1996. No. 95 (3). Pp. 649-655.
  15. Kwong, C.K., Bai H. A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment // Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2002. No. 13. Pp. 367-377.
  16. Çiğdem Sofyalioğlu, Şule Öztürk. Application of grey relational analysis with fuzzy AHP to FMEA method // Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 2012. No. 13 (1). Pp. 114-130.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


##common.cookie##