Specialization of Judicial Activity in Foreign Legal Orders

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article analyzes such a trend in the development of modern civil procedure as the specialization of judicial activity. The authors identify judiciary and judicial aspects of the specialization of judicial activity, different mechanisms of such specialization are given, their variability is justified. On the basis of the experience of different legal orders (Australia, England and Wales, Germany, India, Spain, Italy, Russia, USA, France, etc.) the forms of judicial specialization are shown. Thus, examples of functioning of independent courts for administrative, intellectual, labor, family, land, bankruptcy, financial, and patent disputes are shown. Mechanisms of judicial specialization are also formulated, in particular, branch division of procedural order of consideration and resolution of cases; division into kinds and subspecies of proceedings according to substantial-legal or procedural-legal feature; creation of procedural peculiarities of consideration and resolution of certain categories of cases caused by substantial-legal feature of a case; creation of procedural peculiarities of cases consideration in reviewing instances courts.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Polina D. Pechegina

The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: pbagryanskaya@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 9246-0960
ResearcherId: Z-5531-2019

candidate of legal sciences, senior researcher associate

Russian Federation, Moscow

Maria O. Diakonova

The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the Russian Federation

Email: dolovamaria@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7528-0981
ResearcherId: F-8593-2018

candidate of legal sciences, leading researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Reshetnikova IV. Razmy`shlyaya o sudoproizvodstve: Izbrannoe. Moscow; 2019. 510 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Zamy`shlyaev DM. Specialization as a form of development of the judicial system: legal proceedings, jurisdiction, competence. Rossiiskii Sud’ya. 2015;(8):13–16. (In Russ.).
  3. Kleandrov MI. On the model of the global justice radical autonomation in the Russian Federation. Journal of Russian Law. 2015;(3):31–42. (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/6583
  4. Uksusova EE. Specializaciya grazhdanskogo processualnogo prava v Rossii: ot teorii k praktike: izbrannoe. Moscow: Prospekt; 2022. 280 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Hol AM, Loth MA. Beter Weten; specialisatie in de rechterlijke macht. Trema. 2002;25(10):486–505. (In Dutch).
  6. Mak E. Balancing Territoriality and Functionality; Specialization as a Tool for Reforming Jurisdiction in the Netherlands, France and Germany. International Journal for Court Administration. 2008;1(2): 2–9. doi: 10.18352/ijca.97
  7. Barzelay M. Origins of the New Public Management. An international view from public administration/political science. In: New Public Management. Current trends and future perspectives. Ed. by K. McLaughlin, S.P. Osborne, E. Ferlie. London: Routledge; 2002. P. 15–33. doi: 10.4324/9780203996362
  8. Silvestri E. Judicial Specialization: In Search of the «Right» Judge for Each Case? Russian Law Journal. 2014;2(4):165–175. doi: 10.17589/2309-8678-2014-2-4-165-175
  9. Dolova MO, Bagryanskaya PD. Judicial conciliation in civil cases. Journal of Russian Law. 2020;(5):104–119. (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/jrl.2020.059
  10. Ermakova EP, Ivanovskaya NV. Small claims courts abroad – analogue of juctices of peace in Russia: the experience of Hong Kong, malaysia and Singapore. Mirovoi sud’ya. 2014;(5):21–25. (In Russ.).
  11. Gravina AA. Legal Regulation of Organization and Activity of Courts of Constituent Bodies of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava. 2014;(6):82–94. (In Russ.).
  12. Kudryavtseva EV, Smol'nikov DI. Mirovye sud'i: reformy proshlogo i nastoyashchego vremeni. Mirovoi Sud'ya. 2012;(6):26–31. (In Russ.).
  13. Solov`ev AA, Ostroumov AA. Zarubezhnye modeli administrativnoi yustitsii. Moscow: 2015. 233 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Orobets VM. Spetsializirovannye trudovye sudy: zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiiskoe zakonodatel'stvo. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava. 2003;(9):96–108. (In Russ.).
  15. Gurbuz Usluel A. Mandatory or voluntary mediation? Recent turkish mediation legislation and a comparative analysis with the EU's mediation framework. Journal of Dispute Resolution. 2020;(2):445–466.
  16. Pechegina PD. Zadachi grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [dissertation]. Moscow. 2022. 202 p. (In Russ.).
  17. Sinicyn SA, D`yakonova MO, Pechegina PD. Application of special knowledge in the consideration of disputes on the protection of patent rights. Patenty i licenzii. Intellektualnye Prava. 2022;(1):2–13. (In Russ.).
  18. Rozhkova MA. Discussing the issue of whether the court for intellectual rights needs technical specialists and advisors. Herald of Economic Justice. 2016;(7):269–285. (In Russ.).
  19. D`yakonova MO, Pechegina PD. Jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional forms of patent rights protection: Russian and foreign experience. Russian Journal of Legal Studies (Moscow). 2022;9(2):57–64. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/RJLS108412
  20. hchukin AI. Spetsializatsiya sudov v Kitae kak natsional'naya strategiya razvitiya gosudarstva (chast' II). Zhurnal Zarubezhnogo Zakonodatel'stva i Sravnitel'nogo Pravovedeniya. 2023;(2):66.
  21. Shhukin AI. Specialized state courts — a relevant forum for resolving international commercial disputes. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2021;(3):175–207. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17323/2072-8166.2021.3.175.207
  22. Preston BJ. Benefits of Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law: The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales as a Case Study. PELR. 2012;29(2):396–440.
  23. Pérez VC. Specialization Trend: Water Courts. Texas A&M // Texas A&M University School of Law. 2019. Vol. 49, No. 2. P. 587–629. Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1330
  24. Proverka sudebnykh postanovlenii v grazhdanskom protsesse: rossiiskii i zarubezhnyi opyt: Uchebnoe posobie. Ed. by E.A. Borisova. Moscow: Gorodets; 2018. 672 p. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies