Overview of Digital Technologies for Anti-corruption Purposes

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article was prepared within the framework of analysis of the results of the events dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation. The article gives an overview of the possibilities of using digital technologies to counteract corruption. It is noted that a prerequisite for the successful realization of the benefits of digitalization of public practice is the availability of technological infrastructure, as well as improvement of the legal response associated with the implementation of technological policy. Anti-corruption practices related to Big Data processing (Big Data), distributed registers technology (blockchain), data mining technology (neural networks, artificial intelligence), crowdsourcing technology, and information technology that identifies corruption risks in the financial sector (Forensic Tools) are discussed in more detail. However, the realization of the potential of digitalization in this area implies the need to improve the legal response concerning the implementation of technological policies aimed at suppressing corruptive factors. In this regard, the role of individual judicial regulation as one of the ways to overcome legal gaps and conflicts increases.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Oleg A. Stepanov

Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: soa-45@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1103-580X
SPIN-code: 8156-9725
Scopus Author ID: 57208665632

doctor of law, professor, chief researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

Denis A. Basangov

Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: d_basang@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2776-4241
SPIN-code: 3456-3920

candidate of legal sciences, senior researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Xiao W. Freedom of information reform in China: Information flow analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2013;79(4):790–808. doi: 10.1177/0020852313500598
  2. Aryamov AA, Ruyeva EO. Corruption combating in conditions of digitization: national experience. Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2021;(8): 57–60. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/1812-3783-2021-8-57-60
  3. Khayrutdinova LR. Anticorruption crowdsourcing as social feedback mechanism on a “society-state-society” in the fight against corruption. Modern Scientific Research and Innovations. 2016;(8):347–352. (In Russ.).
  4. Truntsevsky YV. E-anti-corruption or e-corruption: the influence of global digitization. International Public and Private Law. 2019;(4):42–48. (In Russ.).
  5. Ivanova JuA, Sarbaev GM. K voprosu o kiberprestupnosti. In: Tsifrovye transformatsii ehkonomiki i prava: collection of scientific abstracts of the National Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow, 2021 Dec 8. Volgograd; 2022. P. 58–64. (In Russ.).
  6. Gumerov LA, Suleimanova ASh. Individual Judicial Regulation of Legal Relations in the Scientific and Technological Sphere. Russian Justice. 2023;(4):48–54. (In Russ.).
  7. Stepin AB. Types of individual judicial regulation. Russian Journal of Legal Research. 2018;5(1):193–197. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies