Justice as a Principle and Purpose of Law Enforcement

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The preservation of an individual’s personal and species identity depends on their affiliation with specific forms of cooperation. Living together deprives individuals of certain freedoms and promises, such as compensation, security, and the possibility of self-realization. However, such a guarantee can only be provided by a specially organized society that, due to the correct organization of relations between parts and the whole, achieves a synergistic effect. The generalized indicator of such a society is justice, which accumulates other values that are significant for individuals, such as freedom, equality, and solidarity. The historical experience of human communities shows that the most reliable of the known instances of justice is positive (state) law. This article provides an argument supporting the thesis that justice, as the objective of law, is achieved during its application, especially when it acts as one of its guiding principles.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry S. Chukin

Saratov Military Order of Zhukov Red Banner Institute of National Guard Troops

Author for correspondence.
Email: dchukin@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 3772-9561

senior lecturer

Russian Federation, 158, st. Moskovskaya, 410023 Saratov

References

  1. Braver L. A thing of this world: a history of continental anti-realism, Northwestern University Press; 2007. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv47w24v
  2. Khaking Ya. Predstavlenie i vmeshatel’stvo. Vvedenie v filosofiyu estestvennykh nauk. Moscow: Logos; 1998. (In Russ.).
  3. Porus VN. Nauchnyi realism. In: Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 3. Ed. by VS Stepin. Moscow: Mysl’; 2010. P. 38–39. (In Russ.).
  4. Patnem Kh. Vopros o realizme. Germeneya. 2011;(1(3)):20–36. (In Russ.).
  5. Boyd RN. On the current status of the issue of scientific realism. Erkenntnis. 1983;19(1/3):45–90.
  6. Weber M. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Vol. 1–3. Tübingen; 1986. (In Ger.)
  7. Cartwright N. The dappled world: a study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  8. Petrovskaya EV, Pomerants GS. Postmodernizm. In: Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 3. Ed. by V.S. Stepin. Moscow: Mysl’; 2010. P. 297–298. (In Russ.).
  9. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov AG. Filosofiya prava: klassicheskie idei i vyzovy sovremennosti // Transformatsiya paradigmy prava v tsivilizatsionnom razvitii chelovechestva: doklady chlenov Rossiiskoi akademii nauk Vserossiiskikh nauchnykh konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, Moskva, 10–11 dekabrya 2018 goda. Vol. 1. Ed. by A.N. Savenkov. Moscow: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN; 2019. P. 153–164. (In Russ.).
  10. Savenkov AN. Filosofiya prava i global’nyi krizis sovremennosti. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii gumanitarnyi universitet profsoyuzov; 2019. (In Russ.).
  11. Nersesyants VS. Filosofiya prava: libertarno-yuridicheskaya kontseptsiya. Voprosy filosofii. 2002;(3):3–15. (In Russ.).
  12. Sendel M. Spravedlivost’. Kak postupat’ pravil’no? Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber; 2013. (In Russ.).
  13. Canguilhem G. The Normal and the pathological. New York: Zone Books; 1998. P. 39–46.
  14. Bochkarev SA. Gnoseologiya ugolovnogo prava. Moscow: Blok-Print; 2021. (In Russ.).
  15. Novoselov MM. Abstraktsiya v labirintakh poznaniya: logicheskii analiz. Moscow: Ideya-Press; 2005. (In Russ.).
  16. Toscano A. The theatre of production: philosophy and individuation between Kantand Deleuze. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. doi: 10.1057/9780230514195
  17. Simondon G. The genesis of the individual. In: Incorporations. Ed. by J. Crary, S. Kwinter. NewYork: Zone Books; 1992. P. 297–319.
  18. Rolz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta; 1995. (In Russ.).
  19. Latur B. Peresborka sotsial’nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. Moscow: Izdatel’skii Dom VShE; 2020. (In Russ.).
  20. Delanda M. Novaya filosofiya obshchestva. Teoriya assamblyazhei i sotsial’naya slozhnost’. Perm’: Gile Press; 2018. (In Russ.).
  21. DeLanda M. Philosophy and simulation: the emergence of synthetic reason. London: Continuum; 2011.
  22. Shou B. Nazad k Mafusailu. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. Vol. 5. Leningrad: Iskusstvo; 1980. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies