The impact of pesticides used in greenhouses, on the predatory mite neoseiulus californicus (parasitiformes, phytoseiidae)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Nine commercial pesticides  currently used in Russian greenhouses against pests (aphids, thrips, whiteflies) were selected to determine their toxicity to  predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus McGregor in order to find out the potential  use him affected by chemical treatments Vertimec (abamectin), Fitoverm (aversectin C), Clipper (bifenthrin), Novaction (malation), Oberon (spiromesifen), Bitoxibacillin (Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis), Actara (tiametoxam), Admiral (piriproxifen), Confidor (imidacloprid), Mospilan (acetamiprid). The recommended concentration of the preparation (T), half the concentration (1/2T), and a double concentration (2T) were used on the female mite in the experiments. The side effects of the pesticides applied to the predator mite were determined one, three, and five days after the application. The recommended concentration of the preparation of Vertimec, Fitoverm and Clipper showed a higher toxic effect on N. californicus femails (mortality rate 100%). The obtained data reveals the impossibility of their joint application with the release of N. californicus. The toxic effects of Mospilan, Confidor, Admiral, Actara, Bitoxibacillin and Novaktion on N. californicus females were a low level (mortality of females 0-16,6%). The present study confirms that the use of predatory mite N. californicus in combination with these pesticides prospectively in Integrated Pest Management in Russian greenhouse conditions.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Glinushkin

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Phytopatology

Email: innayakovleva@mail.ru

doctor of agricultural sciences

俄罗斯联邦, 143050, Moskovskaya oblast, Odintsovskiu rayon, Bolshie Vyasemy

I. Yakovleva

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Phytopatology

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: innayakovleva@mail.ru

candidate of biological sciences

俄罗斯联邦, 143050, Moskovskaya oblast, Odintsovskiu rayon, Bolshie Vyasemy

Yu. Meshkov

All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Phytopatology

Email: innayakovleva@mail.ru

candidate of biological sciences

俄罗斯联邦, 143050, Moskovskaya oblast, Odintsovskiu rayon, Bolshie Vyasemy

参考

  1. Castagnoli M., Liguori M., Simoni S. Effect of two different host plants on biological features of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) // Internat. J. Acarol. – 1999. – V. 25. – P. 145-150. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01647959908683626.
  2. Rott A.S., Ponsonby O.J. Improving the control of Tetranychus urticae on edible glasshouse crops using a specialist coccinellid (Stethorus punctillum Weise) and a generalist mite (Amblyseius californicus McGregor) as biocontrol agents // Biocontrol Science and Technology. – 2000. – T. 10. – P. 487-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583150050115070.
  3. Vergel S.J.N., Bustos R.A., Rodríguez C.D., Cantor R.F. Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi and garlic–pepper extract on the predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus and their effect on the spider mite Tetranychus urticae // Biological Control. – 2011. – V. 57. – P. 143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.02.007.
  4. Argolo Sá P., Banyuls N., Santiago S., Mollá Ó., Jacas J.A., Urbaneja A. Compatibility of Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with imidacloprid to manage clementine nursery pests // Crop Protection. – 2013. – V 43. – P. 175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.09.018. 5. Sato M.E., da Silva M.Z., Raga A. Cangani K.G., Veronez B., Nicastro R.L. Spiromesifen toxicity to the spider mite Tetranychus urticae and selectivity to the predator Neoseiulus californicus // Phytoparasitica. – 2011. – V. 39. – P. 437-445. doi: 10.1007/s12600-011-0189-x.
  5. Uddin N., Alam Z., Md. Uddin M.R., Mian I.H., Mustarin K.-E. Toxicity of pesticides to Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari:Tetranychidae) and their side effects on Neoseiulus californicus (Acari:Phytoseiidae) // International Journal of Acarology. – 2015. – V. 41. – P. 688-693. DOI.org/10.1080/01647954.2015.1094512.
  6. Ochiai N., Mizuno M., Mimori N., Miyake T., Dekeyser M., Canlas L.J., Takeda M. Toxicity of bifenazate and its principal active metabolite, diazene, to Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus citri and their relative toxicity to the predaceous mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus // Exp. Appl. Acarol. – 2007. – V. 43. – N. 3. – P. 181-197. doi: 10.1007/s10493-007-9115-9.
  7. Lee S.M., Kim S.S. Susceptibility of the predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to acaricides // The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science. – 2015. – V. 19. – P. 418-423. DOI : 10.7585/kjps.2015.19.4.418.
  8. Yorulmaz Salman S.., Turan İ. Side effects of four acaricides on two phytoseiid mites, Neoseiulus californicus McGregor and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) // Süleyman Demirel University. Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. – 2017. – V. 21. – P. 216-223. doi: 10.19113/sdufbed.15500.
  9. Maroufpoor M., Ghoosta Y., Pourmirza A.A., Lotfalizadeh H. The effects of selected acaricides on life table parameters of the predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus, fed on European red mite // North-Western J. of Zool. – 2016. – V. 12. – P. 1-6. http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html.
  10. Hassan S.A. Activities of the IOBC/WPRS working group “pesticides and beneficial organisms” // Bulletin OILB/SROP. – 1994. – V. 17. – P. 1-5. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5791-3_3.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Russian academy of sciences, 2019