The Implications of Russia-Ukraine Conflict for Geo-economics Development

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Apart from the huge influence on the regional geopolitical situation, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has also brought about a tremendous impact on the development of global geo-economic order. The United States and European countries have imposed sanctions on Russia with geopolitical tools regarding finance, currency, energy and other fields, breaking the asymmetric interdependence balance of regional geo-economics. Under such circumstances, the global geo-economic landscape has been reconfigured and shifted. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to explore the definition, development and future trend of geo-economics in the new context.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yunbao Ding

Shanghai University of Political Science and Law; Center for International Legal Training and Cooperation for the SCO

Email: jackyding210@163.com
PhD Shanghai, People's Republic of China

References

  1. Edward Luttwak. From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce[J]. The National Interest, Vol.20, No. 3, 1990, P. 17.
  2. G. John Ikenberry. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order, International Security, Vol. 23, No. 3 (Winter 1998/99), pp. 43-78.
  3. Edward Luttwak. From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce [J]. The National Interest, Vol.20, No.3, 1990, P. 19.
  4. Matthew Sparke. From geopolitics to geoeconomics: Transnational state effects in the borderlands [J]. Geopolitics, Vol. 3, No. 2, Autumn 1998, p.66.
  5. Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse. Geoeconomic Relations between the EU and China: The Lessons from the EU Weapon Embargo and From Galileo’, Geopolitics [J]., Volume 19, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 40-65.
  6. Blackwill R. D., Harris J. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. p. 20.
  7. Gyula Csurgai, The Increasing Importance of Geoeconomics in Power Rivalries in the Twenty-First Century [J], Geopolitics, Published online: 27 Oct 2017, P. 42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1359547.
  8. Pascal Lorot, Introduction à la géoéconomie [M]. Paris: Institut européen de géoéconomie, 1999, p. 15.
  9. Mikael Wigell, Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism [J]. Asia Europe Journal, Vol. 14, 2016, pp. 135-151.
  10. Johan Adriaensen, Evgeny Postnikov. A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy? EU Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific [M]. Witzerland, Palgrave Macmilla, 2022, P. 7.
  11. Sattich T, Inderberg T. EU Geoeconomics: A Framework for Analyzing Bilateral Relations in the European Union [J]. Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 57. Number 3. 2019, p. 502.
  12. Gladkii Yu.N., Nikitina M.G., and Marunenko N.V., Geographical Economy: A Subject of Investigation and Development Tendencies [J]. Izv. Rus. Geogr. Obshch., 2004, p. 3.
  13. S. S. Lachininskii. Current Trends in Geoeconomic Studies in Russia [J]. Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, p. 81.
  14. Blackwill R. D., Harris J. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. p. 154.
  15. Blackwill R. D., Harris J. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. p. 154.
  16. Felix Gilbert, To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy [M]. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1970, pp. 111-115.
  17. 亚当·斯密 《国富论》 下卷 [M] 郭大力、王亚南译 商务印书馆2014年版 第32-40页。
  18. 大卫·李嘉图 《政治经济学及赋税原理》[M] 丰俊功译 光明日报出版社2009年版 第21-28页。
  19. Michael Lind, The Return of Geo-economics[J].The National Interest, November/December 2019, PP. 14-15.
  20. George Kennan, The Sources of Soviet Conduct [J]. Foreign Affairs, July 1947, No 4; Vol. 25. PP. 566-582.
  21. Michael Lind, The Return of Geo-economics [J]. The National Interest, November/December 2019, P. 17.
  22. Henry Kissinger, White House Years [M]. Simon & Schuster, 2011, P. 317.
  23. Krasner, S. D., State Power and the Structure of International Trade, World Politics[J], Volume 28 , Issue 3, April 1976, pp. 317-347.
  24. Richard N. Cooper, Trade Policy is Foreign Policy[J], Foreign Policy, No. 9, Winter, 1972-1973. pp. 18-36.
  25. Edward Luttwak. The Endangered American Dream: How to Stop the United States from Becoming a Third World Country and How to Win the Geo-Economic Struggle for Industrial Supremacy [M]. New York. Simon & Schuster, 1993, P. 257.
  26. Mikael Wigell, Sören Scholvin and Mika Aaltola. Geo-economics and power politics in the 21st century: the revival of economic statecraft [M]. New York, Routledge, 2019, p. 4.
  27. Markus Jaeger. Defense and Deterrence Against Geo-Economic Coercion: What Germany and the EU Can Learn from China and the United States [R]. No. 4 March 2022, http://chrome-extension://bocbaocobfecmglnmeaeppambideimao/pdf/viewer.html?file=https%3A%2F%2Fdgap.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Farticle_pdfs%2FDGAP-Report-2022-04-EN.pdf.
  28. Eurostat. Energy represented 62% of EU imports from Russia [EB/OL]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220307-1.
  29. OPEN JOURNAL. Foreign trade of Russia: results of 2021 [EB/OL]., https://journal.open-broker.ru/research/vneshnyaya-torgovlya-rossii-itogi-2021-goda /.
  30. Vladimir Kiselyov Gazprom Continues to reduce gas exports to Europe, oil is still selling well, cryptosym in Coinbase [EB/OL] https://smart-lab.ru/blog/811653.php.
  31. Julian Lee. Russia's Crude Flows to Asia Take Hold Near Unprecedented Levels [EB/OL]. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-13/russia-s-crude-flows-to-asia-take-hold-near-unprecedented-levels#xj4y7vzkg.
  32. 谢宝剑、朱小敏 地缘经济研究进展[J].社会科学 2019年第10期 第32页。
  33. Jeremi Suri, Benjamin Valentino, State Finance and National Power: Great Britain, China, and the United States in Historical Perspective [R], Tobin Project discussion paper on «Sus-tainable National Security Strategy», 2016. p. 5.
  34. European Commission. REPower EU: A plan to rapidly reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels and fast forward the green transition [EB/OL]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_3131.
  35. Barton J. R., «Flags of Convenience»: Geoeconomics and Regulatory Minimisation’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie [J]. Volume 90, Issue 2, 1999, pp. 142-155.
  36. Gyula Csurgai, The Increasing Importance of Geoeconomics in Power Rivalries in the Twenty-First Century [J], Geopolitics, Published online: 27 Oct 2017, PP. 41-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1359547.
  37. Edward Luttwak. From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce [J]. The National Interest, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1990, P. 17.
  38. Mikael Mattlin, Mikael Wigell. Geoeconomics in the context of restive regional powers [J]. Asia Europe Journal, No. 14, 2016, p. 126.
  39. White House. National Security Strategy of the United States of America[R]. The White House, December. 2017, P. 17. Available at: http://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2017.pdf.
  40. Johan Adriaensen, Evgeny Postnikov, A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy? EU Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific [M]. Switzerland, Palgrave Macmilla, 2022, P. 4.
  41. Mikael Wigell, Sören Scholvin and Mika Aaltola. Geo-economics and power politics in the 21st century: the revival of economic statecraft [M]. New York, Routledge, 2019, p. 54.
  42. Daniel Bell, The cultural contradictions of capitalism: twentieth anniversary edition, New York: Basic Books, 1996, p. 330.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies