Prosecutor in pre-trial proceedings on criminal cases (comparative legal analysis of the legislation of European States and the legislation of Russia)


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the special role of the Prosecutor in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case. Objectives of the study: a) to analyze the standards of the Prosecutor's activity in a criminal case, reflected in the documents of the Council of Europe; b) to determine the specifics of the legislation of a number of European countries and the Russian state, containing the rules and procedures for the Prosecutor's participation in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case; с) show the positions that exist in the doctrine of criminal procedure law regarding the role of the Prosecutor at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process d) justify recommendations for further enhancing the role of the Prosecutor in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case. The methodological basis of the research is the dialectical method of cognition, General scientific methods of abstraction, analysis and synthesis, as well as special legal methods (historical-legal, comparative-legal, logical-legal, etc.). Conclusions: the Prosecutor must have full power to implement the accusatory function, both in court and during pre-trial proceedings. This common European legal standard, which is present in all developed criminal procedure procedures in continental Europe, is violated in Russia: where the Prosecutor's procedural rights to charge and form evidence are limited due to the principle of procedural independence of the investigator. The author believes that it is necessary to return to the common European legal standard of participation of the Prosecutor in the preliminary investigation of a criminal case.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Oleg V. Levchenko

Prosecutor's Office of the Troitsky and Novomoskovsky administrative districts

Email: 2923757@rambler.ru
Cand. Sci. (Law), Prosecutor of the Troitsky and Novomoskovsky administrative districts of Moscow, Prosecutor's Office of the Troitsky and Novomoskovsky administrative districts Russian Federation

References

  1. Александров А.С. Реформа полиции, реформа обвинительной власти России - путь к евроинтеграции // Юридическая наука и правоохранительная практика. 2013. № 4. С. 49-57.
  2. Бутов В.Н. Уголовный процесс Австрии. - Красноярск: Издательство Красноярского университета, 1988. - 200 с.
  3. Васильева Е.Г. Уголовный процесс: догматико-аксиологическое исследование: монография. - М.: Юрлитинформ, 2013. - 584 с.
  4. Иллюминати Дж. Построение состязательной модели уголовного процесса в Италии //Уголовная юстиция: связь времен. Избранные материалы международной научной конференции. - М.: Актион-Медиа, 2012. 140 с.
  5. Курс уголовного процесса / Под ред. д.ю.н., проф. Л.В. Головко. - 2-е изд., испр. - М.: Статут, 2017. - 1280 с.
  6. Муравьев Н.В. Общие основания устройства и уголовной деятельности прокурорского надзора (1891-1892 г.) / Из прошлой деятельности. - СПб., 1900. - Т. 1. - 572 с.
  7. Муравьев Н.В. Прокурорский надзор в его устройстве и деятельности: пособие для прокурорской службы. - М., 1899. - Т. 1. - 568 с.
  8. Тарасов-Родионов П.И. Предварительное следствие. - М., 1956. - 196 с.
  9. Трефилов А.А. Организация досудебного производства по УПК Швейцарии 2007 года // Автореф. дисс. … канд. юрид. наук. - М., 2014. - 35 с.
  10. Щегловитов И.Г. Основные начала современного уголовного судопроизводства. // Журнал министерства юстиции. 1903. № 9. С. 63-101.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies