Notary as a participant in extrajudicial procedures for protecting the rights and legitimate interests of citizens


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The purpose of the analysis of the notary's activity is to identify the specific features of its powers to protect the rights of citizens in the framework of non-judicial procedures, to identify the stages of notary proceedings, during which the rights and legitimate interests of citizens are ensured. The practical significance of the author's conclusions is expressed in the identification of existing problems in the implementation of actions by notaries for the non-judicial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, which can contribute to improving the effectiveness of their work. The value of the author's conclusions is expressed in the presence of both theoretical arguments about the features of the notary's activities to protect the rights of citizens, and in the formulation of proposals for the development of notarial actions in the framework of non-judicial procedures to ensure the rights of citizens. Conclusions: the notary public is a body that performs actions to prevent violations of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, which are part of non-judicial procedures to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, and most often these actions are preventive in nature and precede the protection of rights. The author concludes that any notarial action consists of three mandatory stages and one optional, the essence of which is that the possibility of its Commission depends on both the notary himself and the person who applied to him. The problem of the lack of requirements for mandatory notarization of all types of transactions in relation to real estate, which cannot be resolved through law enforcement or interpretation activities, is identified. To resolve this problem, changes to the Russian legislation regulating the competence of notaries are necessary.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sofya S. Merkulova

Tambov state University named after G. R. Derzhavin

Email: smerkulova@mail.ru
post-graduate student of the Department of theory and history of state and law Tambov, Russian Federation

References

  1. Воронюк Е. П. О роли частного нотариата во внесудебной защите конституционных прав граждан // Вестник Пензенского государственного университета. - 2016. - № 1. - С.10-13.
  2. Гинзбург И. В., Еремина М. А. Нотариальная форма защиты прав участников сделки по отчуждению доли в уставном капитале обществ: теория и практика // Проблемы экономики и юридической практики. - 2018. - № 3. - С. 154-157.
  3. Лукина В. В. Понятие нотариальной формы удостоверения сделок с земельными участками: общие положения // Бизнес в законе. Экономико-юридический журнал. - 2014. - № 4. - С. 56-60.
  4. Треушников М. К. Современные проблемы гражданского и нотариального процесса // Нотариальный вестник. - 1998. - № 9. - С. 35-37.
  5. Филиппова О. В. Нотариат России в механизме защиты прав граждан // Административное и муниципальное право. - 2010. - №10. - С. 23-31.
  6. Фролович Э. М. Нотариальные действия как основание возникновения процессуальных отношений // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. - 2017. - № 1. - С. 119-122.
  7. Черемных Г. Г. Нотариальные действия и основные правила их совершения // Бюллетень нотариальной практики. - 2004. - № 5. - С. 14-20.
  8. Шабалина Н. В. Правила совершения нотариальных действий: общие положения // Научный поиск. - 2016. - № 2.1. - С. 75-76.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies