COGNITIVE MODELING OF LABOR ACTIVITY PROCESSES IN R&D


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

In this paper, a comprehensive study of the processes of intellectual activity in the field of R & D and the development of proposals to improve the effectiveness of scientific activity. The study was performed using the system analysis methodology and cognitive modeling using the electronic decision support system (DSS) of the NEEDLE. The main subsystems of the labor system of R&D - specialists, affecting the efficiency of its activities, are identified. An iterative method using surveys of an expert group formed a system of the most important and quantitatively evaluated concepts. Identified the problematic factors in this area that are most important to increase for Russia: wages, the demand for scientific research, financing and provision of resources, the R&D support system. The cognitive matrix of this weakly structured system is constructed. With the help of DSS, it is shown that the matrix has a high total level of consonance (confidence) of 72%. The system has little effect on the group of mental factors. For coordinated work of the system, such key concepts as the demand for scientific research, the R & D support system in the company, innovative business culture, teamwork training, and self-control are of high importance. Dynamic modeling of the system behavior under the influence of the controlling factor “Retraining of Scientific Personnel” showed that with its increase by 14%, the increase in the effectiveness of scientific work is 14%, and the salary by 11%, the growth of education level by 21%. At a low rate (~ 6%), organizational concepts and the slowest concepts of group work are growing. The developed model can be used in the management of research activities to improve labor efficiency. The work can be used for conceptual modeling in the field of economics of scientific labor

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Viktor D. Orekhov

International Institute of Management LINK, Russia, Zhukovsky

Email: vorehov@yandex.ru
PhD in Technical Sciences, Director of Scientific-Educational Center

Tatiana V. Lyutova

International Institute of Management LINK, Russia, Zhukovsky

Email: Tv-Lutova@mail.ru
PhD in Political Science, Director of Scientific-Educational Center

Elena A. Panfilova

Rostov State Economic University (RINH), Russia, Rostov-on-Don

Email: venize@mai.ru
PhD in Economics, assistant professor

References

  1. Барабанов Д.Д. Развитие волевой регуляции студентов. М., МГУ. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата психологических наук, 2015.
  2. Бурова И.Л., Ленковская Р.Р. Правовая природа прав на результаты интеллектуальной деятельности и средства индивидуализации. В сборнике: Научные исследования в частном праве России/ Сборник научных трудов юридического факультета Российского государственного социального университета. Под редакцией Р.Р. Ленковской. Москва, 2018. С. 20-28.
  3. Капица С.П. Парадоксы роста: законы глобального развития человечества. - М.: Альпина нон-фикшин, 2012.
  4. Ленковская Р.Р. Особенности индивидуализации прав интеллектуальной собственности. В сборнике: Реализация частноправовых отношений с участием публичного элемента/Сборник научных трудов по итогам проведения научно-методического семинара. 2017. С. 17-24.
  5. Макконнелл К.Р., Брю С.Л. Экономикс. М., Инфра-М, изд. 16, 2006 г.
  6. Орехов В.Д. Прогнозирование развития человечества с учетом фактора знания. Моногр. - Жуковский: МИМ ЛИНК, 2015. - 210 с. URL: www.world-evolution.ru
  7. Shinkareva Olga V., Orekhov Viktor D., Soloduha Peter V., Prichina Olga S., Gizyatova Aliya Sh. Multifactor Assessment of Indicators on Dynamic Modeling of Programs for Managin the Perfomance of Scientific Labor. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET). Volume 9, Issue 13, December 2018, рр. 303-317.
  8. Пуанкаре А. О науке: Пер. с фр. / Под ред. Л. С. Понтрягина. - 2-е изд. - М.: Наука, 1983.
  9. Спицнадель В.Н. Основы системного анализа. - СПб. Бизнес-пресса, 2000.
  10. Axelrod R. The Structure of Decision: Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton // NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976. - 404 p.
  11. Barro, R.J., Lee, J.W. International Data on Education Attainment: Updates and Implications, Oxford Economic Papers, 2001, Vol. 53, No. 3.
  12. Belbin R.M. Management Teams. Why They Succeed or Fail. 2004. Second edition. London, Elsevier. - 238 p.
  13. Isaev R.A., Podvesovskii A.G. Generalized Model of Pulse Process for Dynamic Analysis of Sylov’s Fuzzy Cognitive Maps // CEUR Workshop Proceedings of the Mathematical Modeling Session at the International Conference Information Technology and Nanotechnology (MM-ITNT 2017), Vol. 1904. - P. 57-63.
  14. Kosko B. Fuzzy CognitiveMaps // International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1986. - Vol. 1. - P. 65-75.
  15. Podvesovskii, A.G., Lagerev, D.G., Korostelev, D.A. Применение нечетких когнитивных моделей для формирования множества альтернатив в задачах принятия решений // Вестник Брянского государственного технического университета, 2009, № 4 (24). - С. 77-84.
  16. Schofer E., Meyer J. W. The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century, American Sociological Review. Vol. 70, № 6, pp. 898-920, 2006. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4145399
  17. Temple C. Critical thinking and critical literacy. Change (Peremena), № 2, 2005. - P. 15-20.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies