COUNTER-SANCTIONS AND «ECONOMIC WARS»: A POSITIVE VECTOR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND QUASI-ECONOMIC ACTIVITY?


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study the causes and consequences of an increasingly widespread position, according to which the regime of counter-sanctions and economic wars can be identified with the positive prospects of entrepreneurial and, in general, economic activity. To achieve this goal, the works of both domestic and foreign civilists were used (Israel Kirzner, McCain Scott, Armentano Dominic, etc.) The results of the study are the substantiation of the judgment that the development of modern business law requires the formation of a theory of «quasi-entrepreneurial» activity, the essence and specificity of which are described in this article. The practical significance of the work may be due to its use in the process of legalizing the institution of retortions, «packages of anti-sanction measures», etc. The author expresses the hope that the totality of this kind of doctrinal positions, provided they are multiplied in the scientific community and perceived by the authorities, can actualize the negative perception of the phenomenon of «economic egoism» of modern states. The identification of the relationship of this phenomenon with the forms of correlation of entrepreneurial, economic and quasi-economic activity, which is rarely taken into account in legislative and law enforcement processes, confirms the originality of the presented article.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey G. Pavlikov

Financial University under the Russian Federation Government

Email: 89152499929@mail.ru
doctor legal sciences, professor, professor of the Department of legal regulation of economic activity Moscow

References

  1. Денисов С.А. Мнимые конституционные ценности // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2018. № 10. С. 9-15.
  2. Квачева П.И., Петрова С.В. Политико-правовой статус непризнанного государства в современном мире: историко-правовой аспект (на примере Республики Абхазия) // Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки. 2017. № 1. С. 56-65.
  3. Толстых В.Л. «Принципиальное сопротивление» решениям Европейского суда по правам человека в свете критической теории // Международное правосудие. 2018. № 1. С. 79-89.
  4. Щекин Д.М. Баланс частных и публичных интересов и борьба с налоговыми злоупотреблениями в современной России // Закон. 2018. № 11. С. 32-43.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies