STATE AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The purpose of writing is to try to identify different approaches to the regulation of entrepreneurial activities. This sphere of public relations was studied by foreign authors: A.C. Pigou, J.M. Buchanan, J. Gordley. To solve the problems, the author used general scientific research methods: content analysis, extrapolation, systematization and generalization of methods. Special legal methods were used: formal legal method, methods of interpretation of law (grammatical, systematic, functional, logical), legal modeling, legal forecast. This methodology allowed us to conduct an interdisciplinary study and formulate conclusions with a focus on solving problems of legal science. Findings. The author conducts a study of the options for building priorities for the influence of different subjects on the business sphere. The nature of the appropriation by the owners (legal entities) of surplus labor in a modern capitalist society is analyzed. The study showed that the status of the owner and the legal regime of its activities do not contain elements of the legal definition of «entrepreneurial activity». It is concluded that in modern states the political structure has constitutional powers to determine the goals and objectives of the development of the economy, the state and law. An algorithm for the implementation of legal policy in the field of economic, business, corporate, banking, insurance law is revealed. In carrying out the process of development of the economic cycle (production, distribution, exchange, consumption), it is necessary to take into account the cultural and moral component of social relations, to influence the social practices of the population. The interrelation in the modern capitalist economy between the public functions of state control, supervision and private law is shown. Underdevelopment of norms and institutions of civil law can lead to the ineffectiveness of measures to improve economic performance, which forces the use of direct administrative, direct economic methods of state regulation, control, supervision of economic actors to increase budget revenues. The use of such measures affects the level of entrepreneurial activity in the state, the level of development of public institutions. The results can influence the increase in the effectiveness of the application of norms, the reduction of economic costs in the implementation of entrepreneurial activities. The results obtained can be used in the lawmaking process in reforming civil, business legislation. The application of the formulated proposals will make it possible to legitimize the legal and economic policies pursued by state bodies. The work is intended for specialists in civil, business law, as well as groups of specialists who carry out legislative activities in the field of legal regulation of economic activity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey G. Abramov

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: SGAbramov@fa.ru
PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Operations

References

  1. Абрамов С.Г. Правовое регулирование предпринимательской деятельности в сфере финансового рынка // Банковское право. 2018. № 5. С. 15-23.
  2. Абрамов С.Г., Абрамова Л.И. О формах и методах политики государства по изменению концепции регулирования экономического базиса (предпринимательства) // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. 2019. № 1. С. 67-71.
  3. Ерофеев А.А. Ценностный подход в конституционном праве // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. Право. Вып. 28. 2011. № 19. С. 19-22.
  4. Келле В.Ж., Ковальзон М.Я. Формы общественного сознания. - М. : Госполитиздат, 1959. - 263 с.
  5. Львов Д.С. Перспективы долгосрочного социально-экономического развития России // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2003. Том 73. № 8. С. 675-697.
  6. Молодцов Т.Р. Конституционно-правовое регулирование финансовой системы современных государств : дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - М., 2014. - 277 с.
  7. Теория государства и права: учебник / под ред. М.Н. Марченко. - М. : Зерцало, 2004. - 800 с.
  8. Швери Р. Теория рационального выбора: универсальное средство или экономический империализм // Вопросы экономики. 1997. № 7. С. 35-51.
  9. Buchanan J.M. The domain of constitutional economics // Constitutional Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 1. Issue 1. P. 1-18.
  10. Buchanan J.M. The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty (The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan). - Indianapolis : Liberty Fund, 1999. - 546 p.
  11. Gordley J. The State's Private Law and Legal Academia // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 2008. Vol. 56. No. 3. P. 639-653.
  12. Pigou A.C. The Economics of Welfare. - London : Macmillan, 1932. - 837 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies